sergeogrИзвестия Российской академии наук. Серия географическаяIzvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya2587-55662658-697510.31857/S2587556620010161sergeogr-1011Research ArticleТерриториальная организация обществаTerritorial Organization of SocietyЭВОЛЮЦИЯ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕННОЙ СТРУКТУРЫ СЕТЕЙ КРУПНЕЙШИХ МЕТРОПОЛИТЕНОВ МИРАEvolution of Spatial Structure of the World’s Biggest Subway NetworksПановР. Д.PanovR. D.
Moscow
romanpanov1994@gmail.comИнститут географии РАНРоссияInstitute of Geography RASRussian Federation202024032020012026Copyright © Панов Р.Д., 20202020Панов Р.Д.Panov R.D.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://izvestia.igras.ru/jour/article/view/1011сети линий метрополитеновпространственная структуратеория графовsubway networksspatial structuregraph theoryReferencesТархов С.А. Эволюционная морфология транспортных сетей. Смоленск–М.: Универсум, 2005. 384 с.Tarkhov S.A. Evolyutsionnaya morfologiya transportnykh setei [Evolutional Morphology of Transport Networks]. Smolensk, Moscow: Universum Publ., 2005. 384 p.Derrible S., Kennedy C. A network analysis of subway systems in the world using updated graph theory // Transportation Res. Rec. 2009. V. 2112. № 1. P. 17–25.Derrible S., Kennedy C. A network analysis of subway systems in the world using updated graph theory. Transport. Res. Rec., 2009, vol. 2112, no. 1, pp. 17–25.Gattuso D., Miriello E. Compared Analysis of Metro Networks Supported by Graph Theory // Networks and Spatial Economics. 2005. V. 5. № 4. P. 395–414.Gattuso D., Miriello E. Compared analysis of metro networks supported by graph theory. Netw. Spat. Econ., 2005, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 395–414.Haggett P., Chorley R.J. Network Analysis in Geography. London: Edward Arnold, 1969. 348 p.Haggett P., Chorley J. Network Analysis in Geography. London: Edward Arnold Publ., 1969. 348 p.Kansky K.J. Structure of transportation networks: relationships between network geometry and regional characteristics. Chicago: Chicago Univ., Department of geography, Research paper, 1963. 155 p.Kansky K.J. Structure of Transportation Networks: Relationships between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago, 1963. 155 p.Lam T.N., Schuler H.J. Public Transit Connectivity. V. 1. Report DMT-084. Irvine: Univ. of California. 1981. 51 p.Lam T.M., Schuler H.J. Public Transit Connectivity. Irvine: Univ. of California, 1981, vol. 1. 51 p.Lam T.N., Schuler H.J. Connectivity Index for Systemwide Transit Route and Schedule Performance // Transportation Res. Rec. 854. TRB. National Res. Council. Washington, D.C., 1982. P. 17–23.Lam T.N., Schuler H.J. Connectivity index for systemwide transit route and schedule performance. 61st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 17–23.Musso A., Vuchic V.R. Characteristics of Metro Networks and Methodology for Their Evaluation // Transportation Res. Rec. V. 1162. TRB. National Res. Council. Washington, D.C., 1988. P. 22–33.Musso A., Vuchic V.R. Characteristics of metro networks and methodology for their evaluation. Transport. Res. Rec., 1988, vol. 1162, pp. 22–33.Taaffe E.J. Geography of Transportation. PrenticeHall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 1996. 422 p.Taaffe E.J., Gauthier H.L., O’Kelly M.E. Geography of Transportation. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1996. 422 p.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.