sergeogrИзвестия Российской академии наук. Серия географическаяIzvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya2587-55662658-697510.31857/S2587556622020030sergeogr-1532Research ArticleТеория и социальные функции географииTheory and Social Functions of GeographyГеографическое изучение платформенной экономики: существующие и возможные подходыGeographical Study of the Platform Economy: Existing and Possible ApproachesБлануцаВ. И.BlanutsaV. I.

Иркутск

Irkutsk

blanutsa@list.ruИнститут географии им. В.Б. Сочавы СО РАНРоссияV.B. Sochava Institute of Geography, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation202227052022862155167Copyright © Блануца В.И., 20222022Блануца В.И.Blanutsa V.I.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://izvestia.igras.ru/jour/article/view/1532

Развитие платформенной экономики привлекло внимание географов и в последнее десятилетие появились публикации, анализирующие отдельные аспекты данного феномена. Однако общее понимание приоритетов и структуры географических исследований отсутствовало. Поэтому целью исследования стало обобщение опыта географического изучения платформенной экономики и определение контуров будущих исследований. На основе восьми крупнейших библиографических баз данных с помощью специального алгоритма семантического поиска выявлено более семидесяти журнальных статей по рассматриваемой проблематике. Приведено распределение статей по годам и странам. Анализ статей показал, что существующее разнообразие географических исследований может быть сведено к трем формирующимся (сравнительно-географическому, социально-географическому и гравитационному) и двум зарождающимся (пространственно-диффузионному и конструктивно-территориальному) подходам. По каждому подходу приведены основные проблемы, решение которых определяет векторы дальнейших исследований. На основе существующих публикаций и с учетом потенциала географического познания установлено, что в будущем возможно появление экономико-географического, геосистемного и районного подходов. 

The development of the platform economy has attracted the attention of geographers, and in the last decade, publications have appeared that analyze certain aspects of this phenomenon. However, there was no common understanding of the priorities and structure of geographic research. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to generalize the experience of the geographical study of the platform economy and to define the contours of future research. Based on the eight largest bibliographic databases, more than seventy journal articles on the subject were identified using a special semantic search algorithm. Distribution of articles by year and country is given. The analysis of the articles showed that the existing diversity of geographical research can be reduced to three emerging (comparative-geographical, socio-geographical and gravitational) and two emerging (spatial-diffusion and constructive-territorial) approaches. For each approach, the main problems are given, the solution of which determines the vectors of further research. On the basis of existing publications and taking into account the potential of geographical knowledge, it has been established that in the future the emergence of economic-geographical, geosystem, and regional approaches is possible. 

социально-экономическая географияплатформенная экономикацифровая платформабизнес-экосистемасравнительно-географический анализпространственная диффузиярайонированиеsocioeconomic geographyplatform economydigital platformbusiness ecosystemcomparative geographical analysisspatial diffusionzoningИсследование выполнено за счет средств государственного задания (№ регистрации темы АААА-А21- 121012190018-2).ReferencesАлаев Э.Б. Социально-экономическая география: Понятийно-терминологический словарь. М.: Мысль, 1983. 350 с.Gallemore C., Nielsen K.R., Jespersen K. The uneven geography of crowdfunding success: Spatial capital on Indiegogo. Environ. Plan. A, 2019, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1389–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19843925Баранский Н.Н. Избранные труды. Становление экономической географии. М.: Мысль, 1980. 287 с.Agrawal A.K., Catalini C., Goldfarb A. The Geography of Crowdfunding. NET Institute Working Paper No. 10- 08. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto, 2010. 57 p.Блануца В.И. Пространственная диффузия нововведений: сфера неопределенности и сетевая модель // Региональные исследования. 2015. № 3. С. 4–12.Alaev E.B. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: Ponyatiino-terminologicheskii slovar’ [Socio-Economic Geography: A Conceptual and Terminological Dictionary]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1983. 350 p.Блануца В.И. Развертывание информационно-коммуникационной сети как географический процесс (на примере становления сетевой структуры сибирской почты). М.: ИНФРА-М, 2016. 246 с.Anderson J.E. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am. Econ. Rev., 1979, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 106–116.Блануца В.И. Социально-экономическое районирование в эпоху больших данных. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2018. 194 с.Anderson J.E. The gravity model. Annu. Rev. Econ., 2011, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125114Блануца В.И. Цифровая экономика Сибири: территориальные платформы для кластеров // Актуальные проблемы экономики и права. 2019. Т. 13. № 3. С. 1362–1374.Baranskii N.N. Izbrannye trudy. Stanovlenie ekonomicheskoi geografii [Selected Works. Formation of Economic Geography]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1980. 287 p.Блануца В.И. Региональные экономические исследования с использованием алгоритмов искусственного интеллекта: состояние и перспективы // Вестн. Забайкальского гос. ун-та. 2020. Т. 26. № 8. С. 100–111.Belleflamme P., Omrani N., Peitz M. The economics of crowdfunding platforms. Inf. Econ. Policy, 2015, vol. 33, pp. 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2015.08.003Герасимов И.П. Советская конструктивная география: задачи, подходы, результаты. М.: Наука, 1976. 208 с.Blanutsa V.I. Razvertyvanie informatsionno-kommunikatsionnoi seti kak geograficheskii protsess (na primere stanovleniya setevoi struktury sibirskoi pochty) [Deployment of an Information and Communication Network as a Geographic Process (On Example of the Network Structure Formation of the Siberian Post)]. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ., 2016. 246 p.Колосовский Н.Н. Теория экономического районирования. М.: Мысль, 1969. 336 с.Blanutsa V.I. Regional economic research using artificial intelligence algorithms: State and prospects. Vestn. Zabaikal’skogo Gos. Univ., 2020, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 100–111. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21209/2227-9245-2020-26-8-100-111Социально-экономическая география: понятия и термины. Словарь-справочник / отв. ред. А.П. Горкин. Смоленск: Ойкумена, 2013. 328 с.Blanutsa V.I. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe raionirovanie v epokhu bol’shikh dannykh [Socio-Economic Regionalization in the Era of Big Data]. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ., 2018. 194 p.Agrawal A.K., Catalini C., Goldfarb A. The Geography of Crowdfunding. NET Institute Working Paper № 10-08. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto, 2010. 57 p.Blanutsa V.I. Spatial diffusion of innovations: The sphere of uncertainty and the network model. Reg. Issled., 2015, no. 3, pp. 4–12. (In Russ.).Anderson J.E. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation // American Econ. Rev. 1979. Vol. 69 (1). P. 106–116.Blanutsa V.I. The digital economy of Siberia: territorial platforms for clusters. Aktual’nye Problemy Ekonomiki i Prava, 2019, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1362–1374. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.13.2019.3.1343-1355Anderson J.E. The gravity model // Annual Rev. of Econ. 2011. Vol. 3 (1). P. 133–160.Blanutsa V.I., Cherepanov K.A. Regional information flows: existing and new approaches to geographical study. Reg. Res. Rus., 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970519010039Belleflamme P., Omrani N., Peitz M. The economics of crowdfunding platforms // Inform. Econ. and Policy. 2015. Vol. 33. P. 11–28.Borowiak C. Poverty in transit: Uber, TaxiCoops, and the struggle over Philadelphia’s transportation economy. Antipode, 2019, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1079–1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12543Blanutsa V.I., Cherepanov K.A. Regional information flows: existing and new approaches to geographical study // Reg. Res. of Russia. 2019. Vol. 9 (1). P. 97–106.Boutsioukis G., Fasianos A., Petrohilos-Andrianos Y. The spatial distribution of short-term rental listings in Greece: A regional graphic. Reg. Stud., Reg. Sci., 2019, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2019.1660210Borowiak C. Poverty in transit: Uber, TaxiCoops, and the struggle over Philadelphia’s transportation economy // Antipode. 2019. Vol. 51 (4). P. 1079–1100.Breznitz S.M., Noonan D.S. Crowdfunding in a not-soflat world. J. Econ. Geogr., 2020, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1069–1092. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbaa008Boutsioukis G., Fasianos A., Petrohilos-Andrianos Y. The spatial distribution of short-term rental listings in Greece: A regional graphic // Reg. Stud., Reg. Sci. 2019. Vol. 6 (1). P. 455–459.Buch C.M., Kleinert J., Toubal F. The distance puzzle: On the interpretation of the distance coefficient in gravity equations. Econ. Lett., 2004, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 293– 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.10.022Breznitz S.M., Noonan D.S. Crowdfunding in a not-so-flat world // J. of Econ. Geogr. 2020. Vol. 20 (4). P. 1069– 1092.Cennamo C., Santalo J. Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets. Strateg. Manag. J., 2013, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1331–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2066Buch C.M., Kleinert J., Toubal F. The distance puzzle: On the interpretation of the distance coefficient in gravity equations // Econ. Let. 2004. Vol. 83 (3). P. 293–298.Coll M.-H., Vandersmissen M.-H., Thériault M. Modeling spatio-temporal diffusion of carsharing membership in Quebec City. J. Transp. Geogr., 2014, vol. 38, pp. 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.04.017Cennamo C., Santalo J. Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets // Strateg. Manag. J. 2013. Vol. 34 (11). P. 1331–1350.De Marco C., Di Minin A., Marullo C., Nepelski D. Digital Platform Innovation in European SMEs. An Analysis of SME Instrument Business Proposals and Case Studies. Luxembourg: Publ. Office of the European Union, 2019. 70 p.Coll M.-H., Vandersmissen M.-H., Thériault M. Modeling spatio-temporal diffusion of carsharing membership in Quebec City // J. of Transport Geogr. 2014. Vol. 38. P. 22–37.Dejean S. The role of distance and social networks in the geography of crowdfunding: Evidence from France. Reg. Stud., 2020, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1619924Dejean S. The role of distance and social networks in the geography of crowdfunding: Evidence from France // Reg. Stud. 2020. Vol. 54 (3). P. 329–339.Domenech A., Larpin B., Schegg R., Scaglione M. Disentangling the geographical logic of Airbnb in Switzerland. Erdkunde, 2019, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 245–258. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2019.04.01De Marco C., Di Minin A., Marullo C., Nepelski D. Digital Platform Innovation in European SMEs. An Analysis of SME Instrument Business Proposals and Case Studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019. 70 p.Duch-Brown N., Rossetti F. Digital platforms across the European regional energy markets. Energy Policy, 2020, vol. 144, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111612Domenech A., Larpin B., Schegg R., Scaglione M. Disentangling the geographical logic of Airbnb in Switzerland // Erdkunde. 2019. Vol. 73 (4). P. 245–258.Evans D.S., Schmalensee R. Matchmakers: The Economics of Multisided Platforms. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2016. 272 p.Duch-Brown N., Rossetti F. Digital platforms across the European regional energy markets // Energy Policy. 2020. Vol. 144. P. 1–11.Evans D.S., Schmalensee R. The Antitrust Analysis of MultiSided Platform Business. NBER Working Paper 18783. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2013. 72 p.Evans D.S., Schmalensee R. The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-Sided Platform Business. NBER Working Paper 18783. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2013. 72 p.Evens T., Donders K. Platform Power and Policy in Transforming Television Markets. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 304 p.Evans D.S., Schmalensee R. Matchmakers: The Economics of Multisided Platforms. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2016. 272 p.Gerasimov I.P. Sovetskaya konstruktivnaya geografiya: zadachi, podkhody, rezul’taty [Soviet Constructive Geography: Tasks, Approaches, Results]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1976. 208 p. Graham M. Regulate, replicate, and resist – The conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism. Urban Geogr., 2020, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1717028Evens T., Donders K. Platform Power and Policy in Transforming Television Markets. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. 304 p.Greenberg D., Rogerson J.M. Accommodation business travelers: The organization and spaces of serviced apartments in Cape Town, South Africa. Bull. Geogr. – Socio-Econ. Ser., 2018, vol. 42, pp. 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1278/bog-2018-0032Gallemore C., Nielsen K.R., Jespersen K. The uneven geography of crowdfunding success: Spatial capital on Indiegogo // Environ. and Planning A: Econ. and Space. 2019. Vol. 51 (6). P. 1389–1406.Gregory K., Maldonado M.P. Delivering Edinburgh: Uncovering the digital geography of platform labour in the city. Inf. Commun. Soc., 2020, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1187– 1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1748087Graham M. Regulate, replicate, and resist – The conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism // Urban Geogr. 2020. Vol. 41 (3). P. 453–457.Haberly D., MacDonald-Korth D., Urban M., Wójcik D. Asset management as a digital platform industry: A global financial network perspective. Geoforum, 2019, vol. 106, pp. 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.08.009Greenberg D., Rogerson J.M. Accommodation business travelers: The organization and spaces of serviced apartments in Cape Town, South Africa // Bul. of Geogr. – Socio-Econ. Ser. 2018. Vol. 42. P. 83–97.Hagerstrand T. Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Postscript and translation by A. Pred. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1967. 350 p.Gregory K., Maldonado M.P. Delivering Edinburgh: Uncovering the digital geography of platform labour in the city // Inform., Commun. & Soc. 2020. Vol. 23 (8). P. 1187–1202.Harmaakorpi V. Regional development platform method (RDPM) as a tool for regional innovation policy. Eur. Plan. Stud., 2006, vol. 14, pp. 1085–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310600852399Haberly D., MacDonald-Korth D., Urban M., Wójcik D. Asset management as a digital platform industry: A global financial network perspective // Geoforum. 2019. Vol. 106. P. 167–181.Karlsson C., Olsson M. The identification of functional regions: Theory, methods, and applications. Ann. Reg. Sci., 2006, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0019-5Hagerstrand T. Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process. Postscript and translation by A. Pred. Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1967. 350 p.Katta S., Badger A., Graham M., Howson K., Ustek-Spilda F., Bertolini A. (Dis)embeddedness and (de)commodification: COVID-19, Uber and the unraveling logics of the gig economy. Dialogues Hum. Geogr., 2020, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/204382062093Harmaakorpi V. Regional development platform method (RDPM) as a tool for regional innovation policy // European Plan. Studies. 2006. Vol. 14. P. 1085–1114.Katz M.L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am. Econ. Rev., 1985, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 424–440.Karlsson C., Olsson M. The identification of functional regions: Theory, methods, and applications // Annals of Reg. Sci. 2006. Vol. 40 (1). P. 1–18.Kenney M., Zysman J. The platform economy: Restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 2020, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa001Katta S., Badger A., Graham M., Howson K., Ustek-Spilda F., Bertolini A. (Dis)embeddedness and (de)commodification: COVID-19, Uber and the unraveling logics of the gig economy // Dialogues in Human Geogr. 2020. Vol. 10 (2). P. 203–207.Kenney M., Zysman J. The rise of the platform economy. Issues Sci. Technol., 2016, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 61–69.Katz M.L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility // American Econ. Rev. 1985. Vol. 75 (3). P. 424–440.Kolosovskii N.N. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo raionirovaniya [The Theory of Economic Regionalization]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1969. 336 p.Kenney M., Zysman J. The rise of the platform economy // Is. in Sci. and Technol. 2016. Vol. 32 (2). P. 61–69.Kuebart A., Ibert O. Beyond territorial conception of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators. Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie, 2019, vol. 63, no. 2-4, pp. 118– 133. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2018-0012Kenney M., Zysman J. The platform economy: Restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation // Cambridge J. Reg., Econ. and Society. 2020. Vol. 13 (1). P. 55–76.Lee A., Mackenzie A., Smith G.J.D., Box P. Mapping platform urbanism: Charting the nuance of the platform pivot. Urban Plan., 2020, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 116–128. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i1.2545Kuebart A., Ibert O. Beyond territorial conception of entrepreneurial ecosystems: The dynamic spatiality of knowledge brokering in seed accelerators // Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie. 2019. Vol. 63 (2–4). P. 118–133.Leigh N.G., Kraft B.R. Emerging robotic regions in the United States: Insights for regional economic evolution. Reg. Stud., 2018, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 804–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1269158Lee A., Mackenzie A., Smith G.J.D., Box P. Mapping platform urbanism: Charting the nuance of the platform pivot // Urban Plan. 2020. Vol. 5 (1). P. 116–128.Letaief K.B., Chen W., Shi Y., Zhang J., Zhang Y.-J.A. The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Mag., 2019, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2019.1900271Leigh N.G., Kraft B.R. Emerging robotic regions in the United States: Insights for regional economic evolution // Reg. Stud. 2018. Vol. 52 (6). P. 804–815.Lima V. Towards an understanding of the regional impact of Airbnb in Ireland. Reg. Stud., Reg. Sci., 2019, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1562366Letaief K.B., Chen W., Shi Y., Zhang J., Zhang Y.-J.A. The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks // IEEE Communication Magazine. 2019. Vol. 57 (8). P. 84–90.Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Econ. Geogr., 1996, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 293–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/144402Lima V. Towards an understanding of the regional impact of Airbnb in Ireland // Reg. Stud., Reg. Sci. 2019. Vol. 6 (1). P. 78–91.McIntyre D.P., Srinivasan A. Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strateg. Manag. J., 2017, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2596Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts // Econ. Geogr. 1996. Vol. 72 (3). P. 293–313.Nieborg D.B., Poell T. The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media Soc., 2018, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 4275– 4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694McIntyre D.P., Srinivasan A. Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps // Strategic Manag. J. 2017. Vol. 38 (1). P. 141–160.Ours to Hack and to Own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism, A New Vision for the Future of Work and a Fairer Internet. Scholz T., Schneider N., Eds. New York: OR Books, 2016. 252 p.Nieborg D.B., Poell T. The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity // New Media & Society. 2018. Vol. 20 (11). P. 4275–4292.Parker G.G., van Alstyne M.W., Choudary S.P. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2016. 211 p.Ours to Hack and to Own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism, A New Vision for the Future of Work and a Fair er Internet. / Scholz T., Schneider N. (Eds.).N. Y.: OR Books, 2016. 252 p.Qian H. Knowledge-based regional economic development: A synthetic review of knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Econ. Dev. Q., 2018, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242418760981Parker G.G., van Alstyne M.W., Choudary S.P. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. N. Y.: W.W. Norton & Company, 2016. 211 p.Richardson L. Coordinating the city: Platforms as flexible spatial arrangements. Urban Geogr., 2020a, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 458–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1717027Qian H. Knowledge-based regional economic development: A synthetic review of knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems // Econ. Dev. Quart. 2018. Vol. 32 (2). P. 163–176.Richardson L. Digital and platform economies. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Kobayashi A., Ed. London: Elsevier, 2020b, 2nd ed., pp. 317–321.Richardson L. Coordinating the city: Platforms as flexible spatial arrangements // Urban Geogr. 2020a. Vol. 41 (3). P. 458–461.Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 2003, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212Richardson L. Digital and platform economies. In: Kobayashi A. (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. 2nd Edition. London: Elsevier, 2020b. P. 317–321.Roelofsen M. Exploring the socio-spatial inequalities of Airbnb in Sofia, Bulgaria. Erdkunde, 2018, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 313–327. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2018.04.04Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets // J. of Europ. Econ. Assoc. 2003. Vol. 1 (4). P. 990–1029.Rossi A., Vismara S. What do crowdfunding platform do? A comparison between investment-based platforms in Europe. Eurasian Bus. Rev., 2018, vol. 8, pp. 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-017-0092-6Roelofsen M. Exploring the socio-spatial inequalities of Airbnb in Sofia, Bulgaria // Erdkunde. 2018. Vol. 72 (4). P. 313– 327.Sadowski J. Cyberspace and cityscapes: On the emergence of platform urbanism. Urban Geogr., 2020, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1721055Rossi A., Vismara S. What do crowdfunding platform do? A comparison between investment-based platforms in Europe // Euras. Business Rev. 2018. Vol. 8. P. 93–118.Sadowski J. The Internet of landlords: Digital platforms and new mechanism of rentier capitalism. Antipode, 2020, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595Sadowski J. The Internet of landlords: Digital platforms and new mechanism of rentier capitalism // Antipode. 2020. Vol. 52 (2). P. 562–580.Schilling M.A. Technology success and failure in winnertake-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Acad. Manag. J., 2002, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 387–398. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069353Sadowski J. Cyberspace and cityscapes: On the emergence of platform urbanism // Urban Geogr. 2020. Vol. 41 (3). P. 448–452.Schwarz J.A. Platform logic: An interdisciplinary approach to the platform-based economy. Policy & Internet, 2017, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 374–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.159Schilling M.A. Technology success and failure in winnertake-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities // The Academy of Manag. J. 2002. Vol. 45 (2). P. 387–398.Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: ponyatiya i terminy. Slovar’-spravochnik [Socio-economic Geography: Concepts and Terms. Dictionary-Reference Book]. Gorkin A.P., Ed. Smolensk: Oikumena Publ., 2013. 328 p.Schwarz J.A. Platform logic: An interdisciplinary approach to the platform-based economy // Policy & Internet. 2017. Vol. 9 (4). P. 374–394.Spangler I. Hidden value in the platform’s platform: Airbnb, displacement and the un-homing spatialities of emotional labour. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 2020, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12367Spangler I. Hidden value in the platform’s platform: Airbnb, displacement and the un-homing spatialities of emotional labour // Transactions of the Inst. of British Geogr. 2020. Vol. 45 (3). P. 575–588.Srnicek N. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017. 171 p. Stallkamp M., Schotter A.P.J. Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms. Glob. Strategy J., 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1336Srnicek N. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017. 171 p.Sutherland W., Jarrahi M.H. The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 2018, vol. 43, pp. 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004Stallkamp M., Schotter A.P.J. Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms // Global Strategy J. 2021. Vol. 11 (1). P. 58–80.Tiwana A. Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann, 2014. 299 p.Sutherland W., Jarrahi M.H. The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda // Int. J. Inform. Manag. 2018. Vol. 43. P. 328–341.Tobler W. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ. Geogr., 1970, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 234–240.Tiwana A. Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann, 2014. 299 p.Van Dijck J., Poell T., de Waal M. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2018. 240 p.Tobler W. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region // Econ. Geogr. 1970. Vol. 46 (2). P. 234–240.Wentrup R., Nakamura H.R., Strom P. Uberization in Paris – The issue of trust between a digital platform and digital workers. Crit. Perspect. Int. Bus., 2019, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-03-2018-0033Van Dijck J., Poell T., de Waal M. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2018. 240 p.Wood A.J., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V., Hjorth I. Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employ. Soc., 2019, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616Wentrup R., Nakamura H.R., Strom P. Uberization in Paris – The issue of trust between a digital platform and digital workers // Critical Perspectives on Int. Business. 2019. Vol. 15 (1). P. 20–41.Wentrup R., Nakamura H.R., Strom P. Uberization in Paris – The issue of trust between a digital platform and digital workers // Critical Perspectives on Int. Business. 2019. Vol. 15 (1). P. 20–41.Wood A.J., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V., Hjorth I. Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy // Work, Employm. and Society. 2019. Vol. 33 (1). P. 56–75.Wood A.J., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V., Hjorth I. Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy // Work, Employm. and Society. 2019. Vol. 33 (1). P. 56–75.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.