<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sergeogr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-5566</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-6975</issn><publisher><publisher-name></publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15356/0373-2444-2013-1-130-140</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sergeogr-158</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Взгляд географа</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>View of a Geographer</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ЭМОЦИОНАЛЬНО-ЗРИТЕЛЬНОЕ ВОСПРИЯТИЕ ПРИРОДНЫХ ЛАНДШАФТОВ В РОССИИ И ЯПОНИИ: СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Emotional and visual perception of natural landscapes in Russia and Japan: a comparative analysis</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Петрова</surname><given-names>Е. Г.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Petrova</surname><given-names>E. G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Миронов</surname><given-names>Ю. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mironov</surname><given-names>Yu. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Географический факультет МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Государственный геологический музей им. В.И. Вернадского</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Vernadsky State Geological Museum, RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>130</fpage><lpage>140</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Петрова Е.Г., Миронов Ю.В., 2015</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2015</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Петрова Е.Г., Миронов Ю.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Petrova E.G., Mironov Y.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://izvestia.igras.ru/jour/article/view/158">https://izvestia.igras.ru/jour/article/view/158</self-uri><abstract><p>Выявлены как некоторые общие особенности эмоционально-зрительного восприятия ландшафтов, так и основные черты различия между представителями российской и японской культур, а также между разными группами российских респондентов. При группировании ландшафтов важнейшим признаком является наличие/отсутствие воды и тип водного бассейна. Для россиян также важным оказался рельеф, а для японцев – визуальные и сезонные характеристики. Российские и японские респонденты в целом сходятся в оценке привлекательности разных типов ландшафтов, но по-разному оценивают степень их экзотичности. Все группы японских респондентов практически едины в своей оценке привлекательности и экзотичности ландшафтов, в то время как между группами российских респондентов из разных регионов существуют определенные различия. Образы, сложившиеся в обеих культурах, не вполне адекватно отражают разнообразие природы России и Японии.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Some common features of emotional and visual perception of landscapes, and the main points of difference between the Russian and Japanese cultures, as well as between different groups of Russian respondents were revealed. While grouping landscapes the most important feature appeared to be the presence / absence of water and type of water basin. Relief is also important for the Russians, while both visual and seasonal characteristics are signifi cant for the Japanese. Russian and Japanese respondents generally agree in assessing the attractiveness of different landscape types, but evaluate their exoticism differently. All groups of the Japanese respondents assess the attractiveness and exoticism of landscapes almost equally, whereas there are some differences in that respect between groups of Russian respondents from different regions. Images existing in both cultures don’t refl ect adequately the diversity of nature in Russia and Japan.</p></trans-abstract><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Российский фонд фундаментальных исследований, Японское общество продвижения науки</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Девис Д. Статистика и анализ геологических данных. М.: Мир, 1977. 568 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Девис Д. Статистика и анализ геологических данных. М.: Мир, 1977. 568 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ермолаев О.Ю. Математическая статистика для психологов: учебник. М.: Московский психолого-социальный институт: Флинта, 2003. 336 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ермолаев О.Ю. Математическая статистика для психологов: учебник. М.: Московский психолого-социальный институт: Флинта, 2003. 336 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Желамский А.Г. Русский пейзажный вектор (очерки родиночувствия). Издание музея пейзажного наследия “Окоём”, 2008. 212 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Желамский А.Г. Русский пейзажный вектор (очерки родиночувствия). Издание музея пейзажного наследия “Окоём”, 2008. 212 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Николаев В.А. Ландшафтоведение. Эстетика и дизайн. Учебное пособие. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2005. 176 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Николаев В.А. Ландшафтоведение. Эстетика и дизайн. Учебное пособие. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2005. 176 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Петрова Е.Г. Особенности эстетического восприятия природных ландшафтов в России и Японии (природоохранный аспект) // Экологические проблемы. Взгляд в будущее. Сборник трудов V Междун. научно-практической конференции. ЗАО “Ростиздат”. Ростов-на-Дону, 2008. С. 371–374.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Петрова Е.Г. Особенности эстетического восприятия природных ландшафтов в России и Японии (природоохранный аспект) // Экологические проблемы. Взгляд в будущее. Сборник трудов V Междун. научно-практической конференции. ЗАО “Ростиздат”. Ростов-на-Дону, 2008. С. 371–374.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Петрова Е.Г., Миронов Ю.В. Сравнение восприятия ландшафтов в России и Японии (по данным кросскультурного анализа) // Страноведение и регионоведение в решении проблем устойчивого развития в современном мире. СПб.: ВВМ, 2010. С. 150–155.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Петрова Е.Г., Миронов Ю.В. Сравнение восприятия ландшафтов в России и Японии (по данным кросскультурного анализа) // Страноведение и регионоведение в решении проблем устойчивого развития в современном мире. СПб.: ВВМ, 2010. С. 150–155.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Петрова Е.Г., Миронов Ю.В., Петрова А.А. Национальные парки Японии глазами россиян // Природа. 2008. № 11. С. 28–39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Петрова Е.Г., Миронов Ю.В., Петрова А.А. Национальные парки Японии глазами россиян // Природа. 2008. № 11. С. 28–39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рельеф среды жизни человека (экологическая геоморфология) / Отв. ред. Лихачева Э.А., Тимофеев Д.А. М.: Медиа-ПРЕСС, 2002. 640 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Рельеф среды жизни человека (экологическая геоморфология) / Отв. ред. Лихачева Э.А., Тимофеев Д.А. М.: Медиа-ПРЕСС, 2002. 640 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Родоман Б.Б. Эстетика ландшафта // Наука о культуре: итоги и перспективы. Информационно-аналитический сборник. Вып. 3. М.: Росс. гос. биб-ка, 1995. С. 4–18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Родоман Б.Б. Эстетика ландшафта // Наука о культуре: итоги и перспективы. Информационно-аналитический сборник. Вып. 3. М.: Росс. гос. биб-ка, 1995. С. 4–18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Селиванов А.О. Природа, история, культура. Экологические аспекты культуры народов мира. М.: ГЕОС, 2000. 322 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Селиванов А.О. Природа, история, культура. Экологические аспекты культуры народов мира. М.: ГЕОС, 2000. 322 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фролова М.Ю. Оценка эстетических достоинств природных ландшафтов. // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 5. Геогр. 1994. № 2. С. 27–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Фролова М.Ю. Оценка эстетических достоинств природных ландшафтов. // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 5. Геогр. 1994. № 2. С. 27–33.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aoki Y. Review Article: Trends in the Study of the Psychological Evaluation of Landscape // Landscape Res. 1999. V. 24. № 1. P. 85–94.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aoki Y. Review Article: Trends in the Study of the Psychological Evaluation of Landscape // Landscape Res. 1999. V. 24. № 1. P. 85–94.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aoki Y. Recent Trends of English Paper on the Psychological Evaluation of Landscape // J.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aoki Y. Recent Trends of English Paper on the Psychological Evaluation of Landscape // J.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Environmental Infor. Sci. March 2007. V. 35. № 5. Р. 181–188.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Environmental Infor. Sci. March 2007. V. 35. № 5. Р. 181–188.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bourassa S.C. The Aesthetics of Landscape. London: Belhaven Press, 1991.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bourassa S.C. The Aesthetics of Landscape. London: Belhaven Press, 1991.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2001. V. 54. P. 267–281.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2001. V. 54. P. 267–281.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gold-Geochemist 2.0. 1997 // http://www.gambler.ru/gold/</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gold-Geochemist 2.0. 1997 // http://www.gambler.ru/gold/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaltenborn B.P., Bjerke T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2002. V. 59. P. 1–11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaltenborn B.P., Bjerke T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences // Landscape and Urban Planning. 2002. V. 59. P. 1–11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kent R.L. Attributes, features and reasons for enjoyment of scenic routes: a comparison of experts, residents, and citizens // Landscape research. 1993. № 18 (2). P. 92–102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kent R.L. Attributes, features and reasons for enjoyment of scenic routes: a comparison of experts, residents, and citizens // Landscape research. 1993. № 18 (2). P. 92–102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kunikida D. Musashino (The Musashi Plain), 1901.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kunikida D. Musashino (The Musashi Plain), 1901.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Linton D.L. The assessment of scenery as a natural resource // Scottish Geographical Magazine. 1968. V. 84. P. 219–238.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Linton D.L. The assessment of scenery as a natural resource // Scottish Geographical Magazine. 1968. V. 84. P. 219–238.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Okajima N., Petrova E., Petrova A. The influence of Russian literature on two Japanese literary figures and the Japanese sense of scenic beauty // Hawaii International Conference on Arts &amp; Humanities, 8th Annual Conference, 2010 Conference Proceedings, ISSN: 1541–5899. Honolulu, 2010. P. 3135–3150.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Okajima N., Petrova E., Petrova A. The influence of Russian literature on two Japanese literary figures and the Japanese sense of scenic beauty // Hawaii International Conference on Arts &amp; Humanities, 8th Annual Conference, 2010 Conference Proceedings, ISSN: 1541–5899. Honolulu, 2010. P. 3135–3150.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Petrova E., Aoki Y., Mironov Y. et al. Comparison of natural landscapes appreciation between Russia and Japan: methods of investigation // Management for protection and sustainable development. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas. Pisa (Italy), 2008. P. 198–202.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petrova E., Aoki Y., Mironov Y. et al. Comparison of natural landscapes appreciation between Russia and Japan: methods of investigation // Management for protection and sustainable development. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas. Pisa (Italy), 2008. P. 198–202.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tips W.E.J., Savasdisara T. The influence of the socioeconomic background of subjects on their landscape preference evaluation // Landscape and Urban Planning. 1986. № 13. P. 225–230.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tips W.E.J., Savasdisara T. The influence of the socioeconomic background of subjects on their landscape preference evaluation // Landscape and Urban Planning. 1986. № 13. P. 225–230.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ueda H.A. Comparative Study on Forest Image in Japan and Germany // J. Japan. Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2006. V. 67(5): P. 691–694.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ueda H.A. Comparative Study on Forest Image in Japan and Germany // J. Japan. Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2006. V. 67(5): P. 691–694.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ulrich R.S. Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. / Eds. Kellert S.R. and E.O. Wilsonb // The Biophilia Hypothesis, Washington DC: Island Press, 1993. P. 73–137.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ulrich R.S. Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. / Eds. Kellert S.R. and E.O. Wilsonb // The Biophilia Hypothesis, Washington DC: Island Press, 1993. P. 73–137.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang B.E., Kaplan R. The perception of landscape style: a cross-cultural comparison // Landscape and Urban Planning. 1990. V. 19. P. 251–262.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang B.E., Kaplan R. The perception of landscape style: a cross-cultural comparison // Landscape and Urban Planning. 1990. V. 19. P. 251–262.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
