sergeogrИзвестия Российской академии наук. Серия географическаяIzvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya2587-55662658-697510.31857/S2587556624010086GKZPUZsergeogr-2625Research ArticleГеографическая наука за рубежомGeographical Science AbroadЛандшафтная концепция и география религий (на материалах англоязычной географии)Landscape Framework and Geography of Religion: A Terminological Aspect (a Case Study of Geographical Publications in English)ПоплавскийР. О.PoplavskyR. O.

Тюмень

Tyumen

roman.poplavskiy@gmail.comКорандейФ. С.KorandeiF. S.

Тюмень

Tyumen

f.s.korandej@utmn.ruЧерепановМ. С.CherepanovM. S.

Тюмень

Tyumen

maximcherepanov@yandex.ruИнститут проблем освоения Севера ТюмНЦ СО РАНРоссияInstitute of the Problems of Northern Development, Tyumen Scientific Center, SB RASRussian FederationТюменский государственный университетРоссияTyumen State UniversityRussian Federation2024161020248819099Copyright © Поплавский Р.О., Корандей Ф.С., Черепанов М.С., 20242024Поплавский Р.О., Корандей Ф.С., Черепанов М.С.Poplavsky R.O., Korandei F.S., Cherepanov M.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://izvestia.igras.ru/jour/article/view/2625

В статье характеризуются актуальные подходы, применяемые при исследовании религиозных явлений в контексте ландшафтной концепции. Авторы выявляют сходства и различия трактовок наиболее распространенных в зарубежных исследованиях терминов описания религии. Показано, что их смысловое различие задается, главным образом, использованием в качестве инструментария либо культурной географии, сфокусированной на материальности и географическом распределении объектов культурного ландшафта, либо социальной антропологии, в оптике которой оказываются специфика дискурсов и практик населяющих его религиозных групп, понимание социальных процессов, формирующих современный мировой ландшафт. Термин “религиозный ландшафт” (religious landscape), в зависимости от дисциплинарной операционализации, используется в трех основных значениях. Во-первых, под ним понимается совокупность материальных объектов, связанных с религией. Во-вторых, совокупность мест, где проводятся ритуалы. В-третьих, территория проживания приверженцев тех или иных религиозных традиций. Под термином religioscape чаще всего понимается конфликтная или комплементарная ситуация взаимодействия приверженцев разных религий, разделяющих одно и то же пространство. Понятие “сакральный ландшафт” (sacred landscape) иногда выступает в качестве синонимичного термину religious landscape, и тогда под ним понимается совокупность религиозных материальных объектов, иногда означает совокупность мест или объектов поклонения природного характера (гора, холм, болото и т.д.), общую основу разнообразных частных “религиозных ландшафтов”, вырастающих на этой почве. Под термином sacroscape понимается историческая совокупность материальных проявлений религиозности, влияющая как на современных людей, так и на современную земную поверхность. Термин “духовный ландшафт” (spiritual landscape), во-первых, используется в качестве синонима religious landscape и sacred landscape. Во-вторых, под ним понимается более широкий, обобщающий термин, описывающий все аспекты взаимодействия человека (идеи, объекты, практики) со сверхчувственным миром. В-третьих, используя этот термин, имеют в виду пространства, включающие в себя не только ритуальные, но и повседневные практики.

This article attempts to illustrate current approaches to the study of religious phenomena using the landscape framework. The authors identify similarities and differences in the interpretations of the most common terms used in foreign research to describe religion. The article shows that their semantic difference is mainly determined by their use as tools of either cultural geography or social anthropology. In particular, cultural geography focuses on the material objects of cultural landscapes and their geographical distribution, while social anthropology highlights specific features of people’s religious discourse and practices and analyses social processes that shape the modern world landscape. The term religious landscape can be used in the following ways, depending on how it is operationalized. First, it refers to the totality of material objects associated with religion. Secondly, it refers to the places where rituals take place. Finally, it refers to the territory in which followers of particular religious traditions live. The term religioscape implies a situation of conflict or complementary interaction between followers of different religions sharing the same space. Sacred landscape is sometimes applied as a synonym for the term religious landscape meaning a set of religious material objects. Sometimes it means a complex of natural places or objects of worship (mountains, hills, swamps, and others) that provides a general framework for various individual religious landscapes within it. The term sacroscape refers to the historically formed material manifestations of religiosity influencing both contemporary people and earth’s surface. The term spiritual landscape has several basic meanings. On the one hand, it is used as a synonym for religious landscape or sacred landscape. Secondly, it serves as a broader, generalizing term to describe all aspects of human interaction (ideas, objects, practices) with the supersensible world. Finally, the term spiritual landscape refers to spaces of not only ritual but also everyday practices.

ландшафтная концепциякультурный ландшафтрелигиозный ландшафтсакральный ландшафтдуховный ландшафтlandscape studiescultural landscapereligious landscapesacred landscapespiritual landscapeИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ и Тюменской области в рамках научного проекта № 20-45-720004.The research was funded by RFBR and Tyumen oblast, project no. 20-45-720004.ReferencesБобров И.В., Черепанов М.С. Исламский ландшафт Тюменской области: места, численность и социально-демографический состав городских молитвенных собраний // Исламоведение. 2019. № 4. С. 46–58. https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2018-43-4-193-203Allerton C. Introduction: Spiritual Landscapes of Southeast Asia. Anthropol. Forum, 2009, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 235–251. http://doi.org/10.1080/00664670903278387Ваннер К. Новые религиозные движения и “альтернативная мораль” в Украине // Изобретение религии: десекуляризация в постсоветском контексте. СПб.: Издательство Европейского ун-та в Санкт-Петербурге, 2015. С. 214–232.Anttonen V. Landscapes as Sacroscapes: Why Does Topography Make a Difference. In Sacred Sites and Holy Places. Exploring the Sacralization of Landscape Through Time and Space. Nordeide S.W., Ed. Turnhout: Brepols, 2013, pp. 13–32. http://doi.org/10.1484/M.SEM.1.101564Горохов С.А. Конфессиональное геопространство как объект изучения географии религий // Изв. РАН. Сер. геогр. 2014. № 2. С. 21–30.Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation. Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.Горохов С.А. География религии в России и за рубежом: история развития и новые вызовы // Вопросы истории естествознания и техники. 2019. № 3. С. 439–467. https://doi.org/10.31857/s020596060005925-9Bobrov I.V., Cherepanov M.S. The Muslim Landscape of Tyumen Region: Places, Size, and Socio-Demographic Composition of Urban Prayer Meetings. Islamoved., 2019, no. 4, pp. 46–58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2018-43-4-193-203Иеротопия. Сравнительные исследования сакральных пространств / под ред. А.М. Лидова. М.: Индрик, 2009. 372 с.Bovensiepen J. Spiritual Landscapes of Life and Death in the Central Highlands of East Timor. Anthropol. Forum, 2009, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664670903278437Островская Е.А., Алексеева Е.В. Структурированное наблюдение как метод изучения религиозного ландшафта // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2018. № 2. С. 71–115. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.2.04Büttner M. On the History and Philosophy of the Geography of Religion in Germany. Religion, 1980, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 86–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(80)2990029-9Поплавский Р.О., Черепанов М.С., Бобров И.В., Шишелякина А.Л. Протестантский ландшафт Тюменской области: места, численность и демографический состав городских молитвенных собраний // Вестн. археологии, антропологии и этнографии. 2022. № 2. С. 191–201. https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-15Chenoweth J.M. Reconstructing a Changing Religious Landscape: The Material Traces of Barbados Quakers, 1655–1800. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol., 2019, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 462–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761–018–0475–0Такахаси С. Образ религиозного ландшафта в СССР в 1965–1985 годы (на примере Соловецкого музея-заповедника) // Вестн. Евразии. 2008. № 4. С. 9–26.Deffontaines P. The Religious Factor in Human Geography: Its Force and Its Limits. Diogenes, 1953, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219215300100203Allerton C. Introduction: Spiritual Landscapes of Southeast Asia // Anthropological Forum: A J. of Social Anthropology and Comparative Sociology. 2009. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 235–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00664670903278387Dunn K., Piracha A. The Multifaith City in an Era of Post– secularism: The Complicated Geographies of Christians, Non-Christians and Non-faithful Across Sydney, Australia. In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics. Brunn S.D., Ed. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 1635–1654. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_86Anttonen V. Landscapes as Sacroscapes: Why Does Topography Make a Difference. In: Sacred Sites and Holy Places. Exploring the Sacralization of Landscape Through Time and Space / S.W. Nordeide (Ed.). Turnhout: Brepols, 2013. P. 13–32.Dwyer R. The Swaminarayan Movement. In South Asians in the Diaspora: Histories and Religious Traditions. Jacobsen K.A., Kumar P.P., Eds. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2004, pp. 180–199.Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation. Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997. 229 p.Fickeler P. Fundamental Questions in the Geography of Religions. In Readings in Cultural Geography. Mikesell M., Wagner P., Eds. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press, 1962, pp. 94–117.Bovensiepen J. Spiritual Landscapes of Life and Death in the Central Highlands of East Timor // Anthropological Forum. 2009. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664670903278437Furseth I., Ahlin L., Ketola K., Leis-Peters A. Changing Religious Landscapes in the Nordic Countries. In Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere. Furseth I., Ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2018, pp. 31–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55678-9_2Büttner M. On the History and Philosophy of the Geography of Religion in Germany // Religion. 1980. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 86–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(80)2990029-9Gorokhov S. Confessional geospace as an object of study of geography of religions. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2014, no. 2, pp. 21–30.Chenoweth J.M. Reconstructing a Changing Religious Landscape: The Material Traces of Barbados Quakers, 1655–1800 // Int. J. of Historical Archaeology. 2019. Vol. 23. № 2. P. 462–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761–018–0475–0Gorokhov S. Geography of Religion in Russia and Abroad: The History of Development and the New Challenges. Vopr. Istorii Estestvozn. Tekh., 2019, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 439–467. https://doi.org/10.31857/s020596060005925-9Deffontaines P. The Religious Factor in Human Geography: Its Force and Its Limits // Diogenes. 1953. № 1 (2). P. 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219215300100203Gunzburg D., Brady B. Space, Place, and Religious Landscapes: Living Mountains. London: Bloomsbury Publ., 2021. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350079915Dunn K., Piracha A. The Multifaith City in an Era of Post-secularism: The Complicated Geographies of Christians, Non-Christians and Non-faithful Across Sydney, Australia In: The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics / S.D. Brunn (Ed.). NY: Springer, 2015. P. 1635–1654.Hacket C., Stonawski M. The Changing Global Religious Landscape. Washington: Pew Research Center, 2017.Dwyer R. The Swaminarayan Movement. In: South Asians in the Diaspora: Histories and Religious Traditions / K.A. Jacobsen, P.P. Kumar (Eds.). Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2004. P. 180–199.Hadži Muhamedović S. Waiting for Elijah. Time and Encounter in a Bosnian Landscape. New York; Oxford: Berhahn Books, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785338564Fickeler P. Fundamental Questions in the Geography of Religions. In: Readings in Cultural Geography / M. Mikesell, P. Wagner (Eds.). Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press, 1962. P. 94–117.Havlíček T., Klingorová K. City with or without God? Features of post–secularism in religious landscape of post-communist Prague. Soc. Cult. Geogr., 2017, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1312696Furseth I., Ahlin L., Ketola K., Leis-Peters A. Changing Religious Landscapes in the Nordic Countries. In: Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere / I. Furseth (Ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2018. P. 31–80.Hayden R., Walker T.D. Intersecting Religioscapes: A Comparative Approach to Trajectories of Change, Scale, and Competitive Sharing of Religious Spaces. J. Am. Acad. Relig., 2013, vol. 81, pp. 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lft009Gunzburg D., Brady B. Space, Place, and Religious Landscapes: Living Mountains. London: Bloomsbury Publ. Plc., 2021. 288 p.Ierotopiya. Sravnitelnye issledovaniya sakral’nykh prostranstv [Hierotopy. Comparative Studies of Sacred Spaces]. Lidov A.M., Ed. Moscow: Indrik Publ., 2009. 372 p.Hacket C., Stonawski M. The Changing Global Religious Landscape. Washington: Pew Research Center, 2017. 45 p.Inniger M.G., Vorster J.M., Rheeder R. Changing Religious Landscapes Challenge Confession–Based State Policies on Religion. In die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi, 2020, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–10. http://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v54i1.2527HadžiMuhamedović S. Waiting for Elijah. Time and Encounter in a Bosnian Landscape. NY and Oxford: Berhahn Books, 2018. 304 p.Jiménez–Higueras Á. The Sacred Landscape of Dra Abu el–Naga During the New Kingdom: People Making Landscape Making People. Leiden: Brill, 2020.Hayden R., Walker T.D. Intersecting Religioscapes: A Comparative Approach to Trajectories of Change, Scale, and Competitive Sharing of Religious Spaces // J. of the American Academy of Religion. 2013. № 81. P. 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lft009Kilde J.H. Thinking about Religious Space: An Introduction to Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Religious Space. Kilde J.H., Ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2022, pp. 1–22.Havlíček T., Klingorová K. City With or Without God? Features of Post-Secularism in Religious Landscape of Post-Communist Prague // Social & Cultural Geography. 2017. № 19 (6). P. 789–811. https://doi.10.1080/14649365.2017.1312696Koch N., Valiyev A., Zaini K.H. Mosques as Monuments: An Inter–Asian Perspective on Monumentality and Religious Landscapes. Cult. Geogr., 2018, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017724480Inniger M.G., Vorster J.M., Rheeder R. Changing Religious Landscapes Challenge Confession–Based State Policies on Religion. In die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi. 2020. Vol. 54. № 1. P. 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ids.v54i1.2527Kong L. Mapping “New” Geographies of Religion: Politics and Poetics in Modernity. Prog. Hum. Geogr., 2001, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201678580485Jiménez–Higueras Á. The Sacred Landscape of Dra Abu el-Naga During the New Kingdom: People Making Landscape Making People. Leiden: Brill, 2020. 304 p.Kong L. Global shifts, theoretical shifts: changing geographies of religion. Prog. Hum. Geogr., 2010, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913251036260Kilde J.H. Thinking about Religious Space: An Introduction to Approaches. In: The Oxford Handbook of Religious Space / J.H. Kilde (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2022. P. 1–22.La montaña en el paisaje ritual. Broda J., Iwaniszewski S., Montero A., Eds. México: CONACULTA INAH, 2001.Koch N., Valiyev A., Zaini K.H. Mosques as Monuments: An Inter-Asian Perspective on Monumentality and Religious Landscapes // Cultural Geographies. 2018. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017724480Levine G. On the Geography of Religion. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 1986, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 428–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/621934Kong L. Mapping “New” Geographies of Religion: Politics and Poetics in Modernity // Progress in Human Geography. 2001. Vol. 25. № 2. P. 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201678580485Maddrell A., della Dora V., Scafi A., Walton H. Christian Pilgrimage, Landscape and Heritage: Journeying to the Sacred. New York: Routledge, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203751893Kong L. Global shifts, theoretical shifts: changing geographies of religion // Progress in Human Geography. 2010. Vol. 34. № 6. P. 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913251036260McAlister E. Globalization and the Religious Production of Space. J. Sci. Study Relig., 2005, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–5906.2005.00283.xLa montaña en el paisaje ritual / J. Broda, S. Iwaniszewski, A. Montero (Eds.). México: Conaculta Inah, 2001. 488 p.Miles-Watson J. Christianity and Belonging in Shimla, North India. Sacred Entanglements of a Himalayan Landscape. New Delhi: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350050204Levine G. On the Geography of Religion // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 1986. Vol. 11. № 4. P. 428–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/621934Moazzen M. Formation of a Religious Landscape. Shi’i Higher Learning in Safavid Iran. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Maddrell A., della Dora V., Scafi A., Walton H. Christian Pilgrimage, Landscape and Heritage: Journeying to the Sacred. NY: Routledge, 2015. 220 p.Mu Y., Nepal S.K., Lai P.H. Tourism and Sacred Landscape in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Tour. Geogr., 2019, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1558454McAlister E. Globalization and the Religious Production of Space // J. for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2005. Vol. 44. № 3. P. 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–5906.2005.00283.xObadia L. Spatial Turn, Beyond Geography: a New Agenda for Sciences of Religion? Int. Rev. Sociol., 2015, no. 2, pp. 200–217. http://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2015.1039269Miles-Watson J. Christianity and Belonging in Shimla, North India. Sacred Entanglements of a Himalayan Landscape. New Delhi: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. 224 p.Ostrovskaia E.A., Alekseeva E.V. Structured Observation as a Method for Studying the Religious Landscape. Monit. Obshch. Mneniya: Econ. Sots. Peremeny, 2018, no. 2, pp. 71–115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.2.04Moazzen M. Formation of a Religious Landscape. Shi’i Higher Learning in Safavid Iran. Leiden: Brill, 2018. 304 p.Park C. Sacred Worlds. An Introduction to Geography and Religion. London: Routledge, 1994. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203421055Mu Y., Nepal S.K., Lai P.H. Tourism and Sacred Landscape in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal // Tourism Geographies. 2019. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1558454Pennick N. Celtic Sacred Landscapes. London: Thames and Hudson, 1996. Peres Prieto M.F, de Oliveira A.B., Leão F.C., Vallada H., Moreira–Almeida A., Lucchetti G. Religious Landscape in Brazil: Comparing Different Representative Nationwide Approaches to Obtain Sensitive Information in Healthcare Research. SSM – Population Health, 2018, no. 6, pp. 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.08.007Obadia L. Spatial Turn, Beyond Geography: a New Agenda for Sciences of Religion? // Int. Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie. 2015. № 2. P. 200–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2015.1039269Pitkin A. Sustaining the Sacred Mountains: Tibetan Environmentalism and Sacred Landscape in a Time of Conflict. In Volume II. Intellectual History of Key Concepts. Scott G.A., Travagnin S., Eds. Berlin: De Gryuter, 2020, pp. 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110547825-010Park C. Sacred Worlds. An Introduction to Geography and Religion. London: Routledge, 1994. 346 p.Pluskowski A., Valk H., Szczepański S. Theocratic Rule, Native Agency and Transformation: Post-Crusade Sacred Landscapes in the Eastern Baltic. Landscapes, 2018, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 4–24. https://doi.org/10.108014662035.2018.1561009Pennick N. Celtic Sacred Landscapes. London: Thames and Hudson, 1996. 224 p.Robson J. Power of Place: The Religious Landscape of the Southern Sacred Peak (Nanyue) in Medieval China. Cambridge; London: Harvard Univ. Asian Center, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1x07vr3Peres Prieto M.F., de Oliveira A.B., Leão F.C., Vallada H., Moreira–Almeida A., Lucchetti G. Religious Landscape in Brazil: Comparing Different Representative Nationwide Approaches to Obtain Sensitive Information in Healthcare Research // SSM – Population Health. 2018. № 6. P. 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.08.007Poplavsky R.O., Cherepanov M.S., Bobrov I.V., Shisheliakina A.L. The Protestant landscape of the Tyumen Region: locations, size, and demographic composition of urban church meetings. Vestn. Arkheol., Antropol. Etnogr., 2022, no. 2, p. 191–201. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-15Pluskowski A., Valk H., Szczepański S. Theocratic Rule, Native Agency and Transformation: Post-Crusade Sacred Landscapes in the Eastern Baltic // Landscapes. 2018. Vol. 19. № 1. P. 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662035.2018.1561009Sacred Sites and Holy Places. Exploring the Sacralization of Landscape Through Time and Space. Nordeide S.W., Ed. Turnhout: Brepols, 2013.Robson J. Power of Place: The Religious Landscape of the Southern Sacred Peak (Nanyue) in Medieval China. Cambridge and London: Harvard Univ. Asian Center, 2009. 450 p.Scheitle C.P., Finke R. Places of Faith. A Road Trip Across America’s Religious Landscape. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012.Scheitle C.P., Finke R. Places of Faith. A Road Trip Across America’s Religious Landscape. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012. 264 p.Setiadi H. Islam and Urbanism in Indonesia: The Mosque as Urban Identity in Javanese Cities. In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics. Brunn S.D., Ed. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 2415–2438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_127Setiadi H. Islam and Urbanism in Indonesia: The Mosque as Urban Identity in Javanese Cities. In: The changing world religion map: Sacred places, identities, practices and politics / S.D. Brunn (Ed.). NY: Springer, 2015. P. 2415–2438.Sidorov D. Changing Russian Orthodox Landscapes in Post– Soviet Moscow, in The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics. Brunn S.D., Ed. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 2453–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_129Sidorov D. Changing Russian Orthodox Landscapes in Post–Soviet Moscow. In: The changing world religion map: Sacred places, identities, practices and politics / S.D. Brunn (Ed.). NY: Springer, 2015. P. 2453–2472.Streletsky V., Gorokhov S. Cultural Geography in Russia in the Early 21st Century: Current State and Key Research Areas. Reg. Res. Russ., 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020083Streletsky V., Gorokhov S. Cultural Geography in Russia in the Early 21st Century: Current State and Key Research Areas // Reg. Res. of Rus. 2022. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020083Takahashi S. Image of the Religious Landscape in the USSR in 1965-1985 (on the Example of the Solovki Museum-Reserve). Vestn. Evrazii, 2008, no. 4, pp. 9–26. (In Russ.). TThe Changing Religious Landscape of Europe / H. Knippenberg (Ed.). Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, 2005. 300 p.he Changing Religious Landscape of Europe. Knippenberg H., Ed. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, 2005. Turner B.S. Religion and Politics: Nationalism, Globalisation and Empire. Asian J. Soc. Sci., 2008, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853106777371175Turner B.S. Religion and Politics: Nationalism, Globalisation and Empire // Asian J. of Social Science. 2008. Vol. 34. № 2. P. 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853 106777371175Tweed T.A. Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 2008.Tweed T.A. Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 2008. 278 p.Vermander B., Hingley L., Zhang L. Shanghai Sacred: The Religious Landscape of a Global City. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2018.Vermander B., Hingley L., Zhang L. Shanghai Sacred: the Religious Landscape of a Global City. Seattle: Univ. of Washington Press, 2018. 328 p.Wanner C. New Religious Movements and “Alternative Morality” in Ukraine. In Izobretenie religii: desekulyarizatsiya v postsovetskom kontekste [The Invention of Religion: Desecularization in the Post-Soviet Context]. Kormina Zh., Panchenko A., Shtyrkov S., Eds. St.-Petersburg: Izd-vo Evrop. Univ., 2015, pp. 214–232. (In Russ.).Zelinsky W. The Uniqueness of the American Religious Landscape // Geographical Review. 2001. Vol. 91. № 3. P. 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931–0846.2001.tb00241.xZelinsky W. The Uniqueness of the American Religious Landscape. Geogr. Rev., 2001, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00241.x

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.