<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sergeogr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-5566</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-6975</issn><publisher><publisher-name></publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7868/S2658697525050115</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sergeogr-3022</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ВЗГЛЯД ГЕОГРАФА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>VIEW OF A GEOGRAPHER</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Заброшенные объекты в культурном ландшафте города: смыслы и практики</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Abandoned Buildings in the Cultural Landscape of the City: Meanings and Practices</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лавренова</surname><given-names>О. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Lavrenova</surname><given-names>O. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">olgalavr@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ИНИОН РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>INION RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>89</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>858</fpage><lpage>868</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Лавренова О.А., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Лавренова О.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Lavrenova O.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://izvestia.igras.ru/jour/article/view/3022">https://izvestia.igras.ru/jour/article/view/3022</self-uri><abstract><p>Заброшенные строения (“заброшки”), как элементы культурного ландшафта, представляют собой объекты с особым семантическим статусом, которые несут в себе следы памяти о своей былой функциональности и о социальных изменениях, сформировавших эти “вымороченные” места. “Заброшки” выступают маркерами социальных проблем и трансформаций. Они становятся местами “коллективной ностальгии” и альтернативной историчности, противопоставленной официальным нарративам. В статье рассматриваются смыслы заброшенных объектов в бытии и структуре культурного ландшафта, обусловленные новыми культурными практиками, возникающими вокруг “заброшек” стихийно или организованно. Их изучение позволяет глубже понять роль “опасных” пространств в культуре и возможности их легальной ре-интеграции в социум. Анализ типов культурных практик в заброшенных зданиях позволяет выделить несколько ключевых направлений, отражающих тренды трансформации структуры современного культурного ландшафта. Рассматриваются неформальные способы взаимодействия с заброшенными пространствами: от движения “городских исследователей” (Urbex), мистических культов, стрит-арта до временных культурных инициатив (фестивали, перформансы). “Заброшки” — это динамичные объекты, в которых пересекаются память об их былой функциональности, творческая самоорганизация культурных групп и социальные конфликты. Они обладают онтологической двойственностью — смыслами умирания и забвения, и “точкой роста” для формирования специфических субкультур.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Abandoned buildings (“abandonments”) as elements of the cultural landscape are the objects with a special semantic status that carry traces of memory of their former functionality, and of the social changes that shaped these “frozen” places. “Abandonments” act as markers of social problems and transformations. They become places of collective nostalgia and alternative historicity, opposed to the official narrative. The article examines the meanings of abandoned buildings in the existence and structure of the cultural landscape, due to new cultural practices that arise around abandoned buildings spontaneously or in an organized manner. Their study allows for a deeper understanding of the role of “dangerous” spaces in culture and the possibility of their legal re-integration into society. An analysis of the types of cultural practices in abandoned buildings allows us to identify several key areas reflecting trends and drifts in the structure of the modern cultural landscape. Informal ways of interacting with abandoned spaces are considered: from the urban explorers’ movement (Urbex), mystical cults, street art to temporary cultural initiatives (festivals, performances). Abandoned buildings are dynamic objects in which the memory of their former functionality, the creative self–organization of cultural groups and social conflicts intersect. They have an ontological duality—the meanings of dying and oblivion, and a growth point for the formation of specific subcultures.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>заброшенные строения</kwd><kwd>культурный ландшафт</kwd><kwd>обжитое и покинутое пространство</kwd><kwd>культурные практики</kwd><kwd>смыслы места</kwd><kwd>ревитализация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>abandoned buildings</kwd><kwd>cultural landscape</kwd><kwd>inhabited and abandoned space</kwd><kwd>cultural practices</kwd><kwd>meanings of place</kwd><kwd>urban explorers (Urbex)</kwd><kwd>revitalization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Большаков В.П. Культурные практики в процессах становления культуры // Вестн. СПбГИК. 2016. № 2 (27). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnye-praktiki-v-protsessah-stanovleniya-kultury (дата обращения 02.02.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bingham K.P. An Ethnography of Urban Exploration, Leisure Studies in a Global Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2020. 280 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56251-9</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гречко М. Другая сторона Москвы. Столица в тайнах, мифах и загадках. М.: АСТ, 2012. 411 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bol’shakov V.P. Cultural practices in the processes of culture formation. Vestn. SPbGIK, 2016, no. 2. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnye-praktiki-v-protsessah-stanovleniya-kultury (accessed: 02.02.2025). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Грибер Ю.А. Человек и цвет: колористика культурного ландшафта // Человек. 2024. Т. 35. № 6. С. 108–123. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200724060078</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Griber Yu.A. Man and Color: the Coloristics of the Cultural Landscape. Chelovek, 2024, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 108–123. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0236200724060078</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зиммель Г. Большие города и духовная жизнь // Логос. 2002. № 3 (34). С. 1–12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Debord G. Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography (K. Knabb, Trans.). In Critical Geographies: A Collection. Bauder H., Engel-Di M.S., Eds. Kelowna: Praxis, 1955, pp. 23–27.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лефевр Α. Производство пространства. М.: Strelka Press, 2015. 432 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DeSilvey C. Curated Decay: Heritage Beyond Saving. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2017. 240 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семёнов-Тян-Шанский В.П. Район и страна. М.–Л.: Гос. изд-во, 1928. 311 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deyo L.B., Leibowitz D. Invisible Frontier: Exploring the Tunnels, Ruins and Rooftops of Hidden New York. Texas: Three Rivers Press, 2003. 240 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тютюнник Ю.Г. Заводские руины как форма индустриального наследия // Индустриальное наследие как ресурс для развития. Варианты стратегий. 300+: матер. Всерос. науч.-практич. конф. с международ. уч., 3–4 декабря 2020 г. Нижний Тагил: Нижнетагильский музей-заповедник “Горнозаводской Урал”, 2020. С. 181–185.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dobraszczyk P. The Dead City: Urban Ruins and the Spectacle of Decay. London: I.B. Tauris, 2017. 304 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тютюнник Ю. Руины и ландшафт // Проблеми на географията. Рroblems of geography. № 3–4. София, 2022. С. 45–67. https://doi.org/10.35101/prg-2022.3-4.4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edensor T. The Ghosts of Industrial Ruins: Ordering and Disordering Memory. Excessive Space. Environ. Plan. D: Soc. Space, 2005a, vol. 23, pp. 829–849.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фуко М. Другие пространства // Интеллектуалы и власть: Избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью. М.: Праксис, 2006. Ч. 3. С. 215–236.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edensor T. Industrial Ruins: Space, Aesthetics and Materiality. Oxford: Berg, 2005b. 208 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Харви Д. Социальная справедливость и город. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2018. 520 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edensor T. Sensing the Ruin. Senses Soc., 2007, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 217–232.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шенле А. Апология руины в философии истории: провиденциализм и его распад // НЛО. 2009. № 1. https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2009/1/apologiya-ruiny-v-filosofii-istorii-providenczializm-i-ego-raspad.html (дата обращения 24.04.2005).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edensor T., Evans B., Holloway J., Millington S., &amp; Binnie J. Playing in Industrial Ruins: Interrogating Teleological Understandings of Play. In Urban Wildscapes. Jorgensen A. &amp; Keenan R., Eds. London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 65–79.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bingham K.P. An Ethnography of Urban Exploration, Leisure Studies in a Global Era. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2020. 280 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56251-9</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fassi A. Industrial Ruins, Urban Exploring, and the Postindustrial Picturesque. CR: New Centen. Rev., 2010, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 141–152.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Debord G. Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography (K. Knabb, Trans.). In: Critical Geographies: A Collection / H. Bauder, S. Engel-Di Mauro (Eds.). Kelowna: Praxis, 1955. P. 23–27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault M. Other spaces. In Intellektualy i vlast’: Izbrannye politicheskie stat’i, vystupleniya i interv’yu [Intellectuals and Power: Selected Political Articles, Speeches and Interviews]. Moscow: Praksis Publ., 2006, vol. 3, pp. 215–236. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DeSilvey C. Curated Decay: Heritage Beyond Saving. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota, 2017. 240 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fraser E. Urban exploration as adventure tourism. Journeying beyond the everyday. In Liminal Landscapes: Travel, Experience and Spaces In-between. Andrews H, Roberts L., Eds. London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 136–151.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deyo L.B., Leibowitz D. Invisible Frontier: Exploring the Tunnels, Ruins and Rooftops of Hidden New York. Texas: Three Rivers Press, 2003. 240 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fulton C. Urban exploration: Secrecy and information creation and sharing in a hobby context. Library and Information Sci. Res., 2017, no. 39, pp. 189–198.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dobraszczyk P. The Dead City: Urban Ruins and the Spectacle of Decay. London: I.B. Tauris, 2017. 304 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garrett B., Hawkins H. And Now for Something Completely Different… Thinking Through Explorer Subject-Bodies: A Response to Mott and Roberts. Antipode Discussion Paper, 11 November 2013. Available at: http://antipodefoundation.org/2013/11/18/critical-dialogue-urban-exploration-subject-bodies-and-the-politics-of-difference/ (accessed: 24.03.2024).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edensor T. The Ghosts of Industrial Ruins: Ordering and Disordering Memory // Excessive Space. Environ. and Planning D: Society and Space. 2005a. № 23. P. 829–849.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grechko M. Drugaya storona Moskvy. Stolista v tainakh, mifakh i zagadkakh [The Other Side of Moscow. The Capital in Secrets, Myths and Riddles]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2012. 411 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edensor T. Industrial Ruins: Space, Aesthetics and Materiality. Oxford: Berg, 2005b. 208 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Greco J. The Psychology of Ruin Porn. CityLab. Retrieved April 14, 2015, from Available at: www.citylab.com/design/2012/01/psychology-ruin-porn/886/ (accessed: 24.03.2025).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edensor T. Sensing the Ruin // Senses &amp; Society. 2007. № 2 (2). P. 217–232.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harvey D. Sotsial’naya spravedlivost’ i gorod [Social Justice and the City]. Moscow: NLO Publ., 2018. 520 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edensor T., Evans B., Holloway J., Millington S., Binnie J. Playing in Industrial Ruins: Interrogating Teleological Understandings of Play. In: Urban Wildscapes / A. Jorgensen, R. Keenan (Eds.). London: Routledge, 2012. P. 65–79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kindynis T. Urban Exploration: From Subterranea to Spectacle. British J. Criminol., 2017, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 982–1001.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fassi A. Industrial Ruins, Urban Exploring, and the Postindustrial Picturesque // CR: The New Centennial Review. 2010. № 10 (1). P. 141–152.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kindynis T. Urban exploration as deviant leisure. In Deviant Leisure. Raymen T., Smith O., Eds. London: Palgrave McMillan, 2019, pp. 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17736-2_17</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fraser E. Urban exploration as adventure tourism. Journeying beyond the everyday // Liminal Landscapes: Travel, Experience and Spaces In-between. London: Routledge, 2012. Р. 136–151.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lalonde M. It’s too Clean to be Abandoned. An entry level guide to Urban Exploring and a story of how Ontario Abandoned Places began. Burlington: Talking Walls Photography, 2021. 172 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fulton C. Urban exploration: Secrecy and information creation and sharing in a hobby context // Library and Information Science Res. 2017. № 39. P. 189–198.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lavrenova O. Color Semantics of the Cultural Landscape. Arts, 2023, no. 12, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12030111</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garrett B., Hawkins H. And Now for Something Completely Different… Thinking Through Explorer Subject-Bodies: A Response to Mott and Roberts // Antipode Discussion Paper, 11 November 2013. http://antipodefoundation.org/2013/11/18/critical-dialogue-urban-exploration-subject-bodies-and-the-politics-of-difference/ (дата обращения 24.03.2024).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lefevr Α. Proizvodstvo prostranstva [Production of Space]. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2015. 432 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Greco J. The Psychology of Ruin Porn. CityLab. Retrieved April 14, 2015. www.citylab.com/design/2012/01/psychology-ruin-porn/886 (дата обращения 24.03.2025).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lesné R. “Urbex and Urban Space”: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Sociol. Leis., 2022, no. 5, pp. 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-022-00120-y.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kindynis T. Urban Exploration: From Subterranea to Spectacle // British J. Criminology. 2017. № 57 (4). P. 982–1001.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mott C., Roberts S. Not Everyone Has (the) Balls: Urban Exploration and the Persistence of Masculinist Geography. Antipode, 2014, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 229–245.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kindynis T. Urban exploration as deviant leisure. In: Deviant Leisure / T. Raymen, O. Smith (Eds.). London: Palgrave McMillan, 2019. P. 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17736-2_17</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mould O. Urban Subversion and the Creative City. London: Routledge, 2015. 2018 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lalonde M. It’s too Clean to be Abandoned. An entry level guide to Urban Exploring and a story of how Ontario Abandoned Places began. Burlington: Talking Walls Photography, 2021. 172 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ninjalicious (Chapman J.) Access all areas: a user’s guide to the art of urban exploration. Infilpress, 2005. 242 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lavrenova O. Color Semantics of the Cultural Landscape // Arts. 2023. № 12. P. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts12030111</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rowsdower Z. Fresh Rot: Urban Exploration and the Preservation of Decay. J. Univ. Manitoba Archaeol., 2011, vol. 29, pp. 1–15.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lesné R. “Urbex and Urban Space”: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis // Int. J. Soc. Leis. 2022. № 5. P. 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-022-00120-y</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schoenle A. Apologia ruins in the Philosophy of History: Providentialism and its Disintegration. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2009, no. 1, pp. 24– 38. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2009/1/apologiya-ruiny-v-filosofii-istorii-providenczializm-i-ego-raspad.html (accessed: 24.03.2025). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mott C., Roberts S. Not Everyone Has (the) Balls: Urban Exploration and the Persistence of Masculinist Geography // Antipode. 2014. № 46 (1). P. 229–245.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semenov-Tyan-Shansky V.P. Raion i strana [The District and the Country]. Moscow–Leningrad: Gos. Izd-vo, 1928. 311 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mould O. Urban Subversion and the Creative City. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2015. 2018 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simmel G. Big cities and spiritual life. Logos, no. 3, 2002, pp. 1–12. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ninjalicious (Chapman J.) Access all areas: a user’s guide to the art of urban exploration. Infilpress, 2005. 242 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Soederberg S. Governing stigmatised space: the case of the ‘slums’ of Berlin-Neukölln. New Polit. Econ., 2017, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1240671</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rowsdower Z. Fresh Rot: Urban Exploration and the Preservation of Decay // J. Univ. Manitoba Archaeol. 2011. № 29. P. 1–15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trigg D. The Aesthetics of Decay: Nothingness, Nostalgia, and the Absence of Reason. New York: Peter Lang, 2006. 265 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Soederberg S. Governing stigmatised space: the case of the ‘slums’ of Berlin-Neukölln // New Polit. Econ. 2017. Vol. 22. № 5. P. 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1240671</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tyutyunnik Yu.G. Factory ruins as a form of industrial heritage. In Industrial’noe nasledie kak resurs dlya razvitiya. Varianty strategii. 300+: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [Industrial Heritage as a Resource for Development. 300+ Strategy Options: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation]. December 3–4, 2020. Nizhnii Tagil: Nizhnetagil’skii muzei-zapovednik “Gornozavodskoi Ural”, 2020, pp. 181–185. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trigg D. The Aesthetics of Decay: Nothingness, Nostalgia, and the Absence of Reason. NY: Peter Lang, 2006. 265 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tyutyunnik Yu. Ruins and landscape. Problemi na geografiyata, no. 3–4. Sofiya: 2022, pp. 45–67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35101/prg-2022.3-4.4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
