Changes in the Functional Use of the Space of Dagestan Settlements in the Conditions of Socioeconomic Transformations of Mountainous Territories

The article considers the transformation of the settlement structure of the Dagestan mountainous territories and changes in the daily use of the mountain villages’ space as an interconnected process using the evolutionary-functional principle and the principle of multi-scale. To achieve the study objectives, a typology of the mountainous and foothill territories of Dagestan was carried out based on the analysis of the population of settlements, their high-altitude and center-peripheral position. Further, in accordance with the typology carried out, key villages were selected to study the directions of transformation of the villages’ space functional use by their residents. In addition to statistical data, the study is based on the materials of three expeditions to the Republic of Dagestan in 2020–2022. The authors surveyed 10 districts and more than 30 rural settlements. The methodology of the mountain villages’ survey is based on the method of field observations, expert and narrative interviews. In addition, as the key most typical mountain villages, the features of the use of public spaces by residents of the five settlements of Fiy, Tsumada, Echeda, Tlokh, Gubden are considered in detail (data on other surveyed settlements were used to identify common patterns in the space use). As a study result, it was revealed that the dynamics, internal differentiation and the nature of the use by residents of mountain villages’ public territories is determined by the settlements’ geographical location, the preservation of agrarian functions, the religious factor and to a lesser extent the ethno-cultural differences of local communities, which are more pronounced in mountainous Dagestan compared to other regions of the North Caucasus. The assumption was confirmed that the transformations taking place in the functional use of the village at the local level are the result of socio-cultural changes taking place at the regional and country levels.

1. Artobolevskii S.S., Treivish A.I., Baklanov P.Y. Russia’s space and development: A multiscale analysis. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci., 2009, no. 79, pp. 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331609010043

2. Gunya A.N. Institutsional’noe restrukturirovanie geograficheskogo prostranstva: vliyanie privatizatsii zemel’ na gornye landshafty Severnogo Kavkaza [Institutional Restructuring of Geographical Space: The Impact of Land Privatization on the Mountain Landscapes of the North Caucasus]. Saarbrücken: Palmarium Acad. Publ., 2013. 143 p.

3. Imangulov L.R. The role of mountain conditions in the transformation of rural areas (on the example of the Samur valley of the Republic of Dagestan). UEPS: Upravl. Ekon. Polit. Sociol., 2021, no. 3, pp. 89–97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2412-2025-2021-3-89-97

4. Kalbarczyk E., et al. Transformation of public space in rural areas-identification and assessment of the state of development in selected communes in the Greater Poland voivodeship. Acta Sci. Pol. Adm. Locorum, 2020, no. 2, pp. 77–84.

5. Kapustina E.L. Global settlement: the fate of locality in relation to modern social life in Dagestan. IAEK, 2019, no. 4, pp. 769–782. (In Russ.).

6. Kapustina E.L. The history of the transformation of the Dagestan holiday. Istor. Arkheol. Etnogr. Kavkaza, 2021, no. 4, pp. 985–1001. (In Russ.).

7. Karpov Yu.Yu. Vzglyad na gortsev. Vzglyad s gor: Mirovozzrencheskie aspekty kul’tury i sotsial’nyi opyt gortsev Dagestana [A Look at the Highlanders. A View from the Mountains: Ideological Aspects of Culture and Social Experience of the Highlanders of Dagestan]. St. Petersburg: Peterburg. Vostokoved. Publ., 2007. 656 p.

8. Karpov Yu.Yu., Kapustina E.L. Gortsy posle gor. Migratsionnye protsessy v Dagestane v XX–nachale XXI veka: ikh sotsial’nye i etnokul’turnye posledstviya i perspektivy [The Highlanders After the Mountains. Migration Processes in Dagestan in the XX–early XXI Century: Their Social and Ethnocultural Consequences and Prospects]. St. Petersburg: Peterburg. Vostokoved. Publ., 2011. 448 p.

9. Kovalev S.A. Sel’skoe rasselenie (geograficheskoe issledovanie) [Rural Settlement (Geographical Research)]. Moscow: Mosk. Univ. Publ., 1963. 371 p.

10. Kurkieva H.M. Institutional factors of territorial differentiation of socio-economic characteristics of rural settlements (on the example of Ingushetia). Reg. Issled., 2012, no. 1, pp. 94–101. (In Russ.).

11. Kuznetsova O.V. Typology of factors of socio-economic development of the regions of Russia. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2014, no. 2, pp. 3–8. (In Russ.).

12. Lyubimova G.N., Khan-Magomedov S.O. Narodnaya arkhitektura yuzhnogo Dagestana: Tabasaranskaya arkhitektura [Folk Architecture of Southern Dagestan: Tabasaran Architecture]. Moscow: Gosstroiizdat Publ., 1956. 104 p.

13. Makhmudova Z.U. Dagestan at the turning point of epochs: ethnographic expeditions of E.M. Shilling. In Sbornik Muzeya antropologii i etnografii. Narody Kavkaza: muzeinye kollektsii, issledovaniya ob’’ektov i yavlenii traditsionnoi i sovremennoi kul’tury [Collection of the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography. Peoples of the Caucasus: Museum Collections, Research of Objects and Phenomena of Traditional and Modern Culture] St. Petersburg: MAE RAN, 2015, pp. 85–102. (In Russ.).

14. Mantey D., Kępkowicz A. Types of public spaces: The polish contribution to the discussion of suburban public space. Prof. Geogr., 2018, no. 4, pp. 633–654.

15. Movchan G.Ya. Staryi avarskii dom v gorakh Dagestana i ego sud’ba: Po materialam avt. obsledovanii 1945–1964 gg. [The Old Avar House in the Mountains of Dagestan and Its Fate: Based on the Materials of the Author’s Surveys of 1945–1964]. Moscow: DMK Press, 2001. 527 p.

16. Muduev S.S. Geographical features of transformation of rural settlement and economy of Dagestan in the 1990s. Extended Abstract of Dr. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Moscow: Inst. Geogr., Russ. Acad. Sci., 2004. 48 p.

17. Nabieva U.N. Kul’turnaya geografiya Dagestana [Cultural Geography of Dagestan]. Moscow: Inst. Naslediya Publ., 2002. 210 p.

18. Shchitova N.A., Soloviev I.A., Belozerov V.S. Dagestan: a model of intercultural interaction in a multiethnic region. Nauka. Innov. Tekhn., 2018, no. 4, pp. 91–104. (In Russ.).

19. Starodubrovskaya I.V. Intergenerational relations and social transformations on the example of the North Caucasus. Sociol. Vlasti, 2019, no. 1, pp. 92–113. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2019-1-92-113

20. Starodubrovskaya I.V., Zubarevich N.V., Sokolov D.V., Intigrinova T.P. Severnyi Kavkaz: modernizatsionnyi vyzov [North Caucasus: Modernization Challenge]. Moscow: Delo Publ., 2011. 325 p.

21. Steinberg I.E. The long table method in qualitative field sociological studies. Monitor. Obshch. Mneniya: Ekon. Sots. Peremeny, 2021, no. 5, pp. 493–516. (In Russ.).

22. Tkachenko A.A. Approaches to the elaboration of a general theory of the territorial organization of society. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2008, no. 1, pp. 21–26. (In Russ.).

23. Treivish A.I. Geographical factors of societal modernization: some lessons from the world and Russis’s history XIX–XX centuries. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2017, no. 6, pp. 3–8. (In Russ.).