Assessment of Mixed Forest Stand Biomass in Kamchatka Using Tree-Rings
https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697525050097
Abstract
In this study, the results of tree-ring based biomass reconstruction as well as carbon uptake of Kamchatka forest stands are presented. Up till now, there are no biomass instrumental measurements available for the Kamchatka Peninsula that could be used to develop species-specific regional allometric models. The problem of lack of data was solved by using measurement series from nearby areas (Magadan oblast and the Sikhote-Alin Mountains). The biomass reconstruction is based on the tree-ring width chronologies of poplar, birch, larch and trunk diameters measured in the field. The results show that the biomass variation is determined by two parameters: summer air temperatures variations and the anthropogenic factor. Positive response of all tree-ring width chronologies to summer air temperatures is strong evidence of the contribution of this parameter to the variability of biomass. It was found that the relationship between biomass and temperature weakened in the 1940s and 1960s, when the recorded vast logging and fires in the area of the Esso settlement led to an increase in tree growth due to an increase in light availability. The reconstructed biomass and net primary production series almost completely coincide for a whole common 22-year period. Considering that both series were obtained by independent methods — based on the tree-ring width and remote sensing data, the tree-ring based biomass reconstruction is highly reliable. Short series of net primary production data obtained from remote sensing do not allow us to assess past long-term changes, since it covers only the last decades, while the tree-rings can provide the biomass estimate for several centuries.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. A. DolgovaRussian Federation
Moscow
I. S. Bushueva
Russian Federation
Moscow
R. R. Bichurin
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. V. Kuznetzova
Russian Federation
Moscow
V. V. Matskovsky
Russian Federation
Moscow
N. S. Semenyak
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Alekseev V.A., Shamshin V.A. About the ecology and structure of stone birch forests of Kamchatka. Botan Zh., 1972, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1055–1068. (In Russ.).
2. Babst F., Poulter B., Trouet V., Tan K., Neuwirth B., Wilson R., Frank D. Site-and species-specific responses of forest growth to climate across the European continent. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 2013, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 706–717.
3. Babst F., Bouriaud O., Alexander R., Trouet V., Frank D. Toward consistent measurements of carbon accumulation: A multi-site assessment of biomass and basal area increment across Europe. Dendrochron., 2014, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 153–161.
4. Bakker J.D. A new, proportional method for reconstructing historical tree diameters. Can. J. For. Res., 2005, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 2515–2520.
5. Beer C. Reichstein M., Tomelleri E., Ciais P., Jung M., Carvalhais N., Papale D. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Sci., 2010, vol. 329, no. 5993, pp. 834–838.
6. Bouriaud O. Bréda N., Dupouey J., Granier A. Is ring width a reliable proxy for stem-biomass increment? A case study in European beech. Can. J. For. Res., 2005, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2920–2933. Brief description of the climatic features of the Kamchatka Peninsula. Available at: http://kammeteo.ru/gms9.html (accessed: 10.06.2024). (In Russ.).
7. Bunn A.G. A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochron, 2008, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 115–124.
8. Deck C., Wiles G., Frederick S., Matsovsky V., Kuderina T., D’Arrigo, Wiesenberg N. Climate response of larch and birch forests across an elevational transect and hemisphere-wide comparisons, Kamchatka Peninsula, Russian Far East. Forests, 2017, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 315–328.
9. Doležal J., Ishii H., Vetrova V.P., Sumida A., Hara T. Tree growth and competition in a Betula platyphylla– Larix cajanderi post-fire forest in central Kamchatka. An. Botan., 2004, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 333–343.
10. Dolgova E.A, Semenyak N.S., Dzhaliashvili T.G., Bichurin R.R., Solomina O.N., Mihalenko V.N., Vorob’ev M.A. Dendroclimatic research on the Kamchatka Peninsula. In Materialy XV molodezhnoi nauchnoi shkoly-konferentsii “Meridian”: issledovaniya prirody i obshchestva v usloviyakh global’nykh transformatsii [Proc. of the 15th Youth Sci. School-Conf. “Meridian”: Research on Nature and Society in the Context of Global Transformations]. Moscow, 2023, pp. 63–69. (In Russ.).
11. Fedotov S.A., Masurenkov Yu.P. Deistvuyushchie vulkany Kamchatki. T. 2 [Active Volcanoes of Kamchatka. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1991. 302 p.
12. Harris I., Jones P.D., Osborn T.J., Lister D.H. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3. 10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol., 2014, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 623–642.
13. Holmes R.L. Computer-assisted quality control in treering dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bull., 1983, no. 43, pp. 69–78.
14. IPCC 2006. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T., Tanabe K., Eds. Japan: IGES, 2006.
15. Jacoby G., Solomina O., Frank D., Eremenko N., Arrigo R. Kunashir (Kuriles) Oak 400-year reconstruction of temperature and relation to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 2004, vol. 209, no. 1-4, pp. 303–311.
16. Kasatkin A.S., Zhanabaeva A.S., Ivanov A.V., Paukov D.V., Akimov R.Yu. Aboveground phytomass of trees in the forests of the southern Sikhote-Alin. Eko-Potents., 2016, vol. 1, no. 13, pp. 32–36. (In Russ.).
17. Kasischke E.S. Boreal ecosystems in the global carbon cycle. In Fire, Climate Change, and Carbon Cycling in the Boreal Forest. New York: Springer, 2000, pp. 19–30.
18. Knorre A.A. Integrated approaches and methods of dendrochronology in the study of dynamic processes in terrestrial ecosystems of different types. Dr. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation. Krasnoyarsk: Sib. Fed. Univ., 2022. 273 p.
19. Korneva I., Toropov P., Muraviev A., Aleshina M. Climatic factors affecting Kamchatka glacier recession. Int. J. Climatol., 2024, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 345–369.
20. Larsson L. CooRecorder and Cdendro programs of the CooRecorder/Cdendropackage version 7.6, 2013. Available at. http://www.cybis.se/forfun/dendro/ (accessed: 10.06.2024).
21. Lockwood B., Maxwell J., Robeson S., Au T. Assessing bias in diameter at breast height estimated from tree rings and its effects on basal area increment and biomass. Dendrochron., 2021, vol. 67, art. 125844.
22. Martin P., Nabuurs G., Aubinet M., Karjalainen T., Vine E., Kinsman J., Heath L.. Carbon sinks in temperate forests. Annu. Rev. Energy Env., 2001, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 435–465.
23. Moskalyuk T.A. Biomass of model trees as a basis for studying the biological productivity of forests in the Magadan region. Eko-Potents., 2015, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 18–24. (In Russ.).
24. Mosolov V.I. Conservation of wild reindeer in Kamchatka. Rangifer., 2000, no. 12, pp. 95–98. (In Russ.).
25. Neshataeva V.Yu. Rastitel’nost’ poluostrova Kamchatka [Vegetation of the Kamchatka Peninsula]. Moscow, 2009. 537 p.
26. Pleshikov F.I., Vaganov E.A., Vedrova E.F. Lesnye ekosistemy Eniseiskogo meridiana [Forest Ecosystems of the Yenisei Meridian]. Novosibirsk, 2002. 356 p.
27. Running S., Zhao M. MODIS/Terra Net Primary Production Gap-Filled Yearly L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V061. 2021, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center Available at: https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD17A3HGF.061 (accessed: 10.10.2024).
28. Shvidenko A.Z., Shchepashchenko D.G. Carbon budget of Russian forests. Sibir. Lesn. Zh., 2014, no. 1, pp. 69–92. (In Russ.).
29. Suzuki H. Estimation of aboveground and belowground carbon stock in a forest of Northern Hokkaido. Masterapost, Hokkaido University. 2012.
30. Takagi K., Kotsuka C., Fukuzawa K., Kayama M., Makoto K., Watanabe T., Nomura M., Fukazawa T., Takahashi H., Hojyo H., Ashiya D., Naniwa A., Sugata S., Kamiura T., Sugishita Y., Sakai R., Ito K., Kobayashi M., Maebayashi M., Mizuno M., Murayama T., Kinoshita K., Fujiwara D., Hashida S., Shibata H., Yoshida T., Sasa K., Saigusa N., Fujinuma Y., Akibayashi Y. Allometric relationships and carbon and nitrogen contents for three major tree species (Quercus crispula, Betula ermanii, and Abies sachalinensis) in Northern Hokkaido, Japan. Eur. J. For Res., 2010, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–7.
31. Terletskaya A.T. Rastitel’nyi pokrov Dal’nego Vostoka [Vegetation Cover of the Far East]. Khabarovsk: Izd-vo Tikhookean. Gos. Univ, 2013. 115 p.
32. Usoltsev V.A. Fitomassa model’nykh derev’ev lesoobrazuyushchikh porod Evrazii: baza dannykh, klimaticheski obuslovlennaya geografiya, taksatsionnye normativy [Biomass of Model Trees of Forest-Forming Species of Eurasia: Database, Climatically Determined Geography, Taxation Standards]. Ekaterinburg, 2016. 336 p.
33. Usoltsev V.A. Fitomassa model’nykh derev’ev dlya distantsionnoi i nazemnoi taksatsii lesov Evrazii [Biomass of Model Trees for Remote and Ground-Based Forest Assessment of Eurasia]. Ekaterinburg, 2023. 324 p.
34. Usoltsev V.A., Chasovskikh V.P., Bogoslovskaya О.А., Noritsina Yu.V., Galako V.A., Terekhov G.G. Estimating Forest Carbon Stock in Alpine and Arctic Ecotones of the Urals. Sib. J. For. Sci., 2014, no. 5, pp. 77–92.
35. Utkin A.I., Zamolodchikov D.G., Chestnykh O.V. Organic carbon of larch forests In Russia. Khvoin. Boreal’n. Zony, 2003, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 66–76. (In Russ.).
36. Vznuzdaev N.A., Karpachevskii L.O. Characteristics of the water-physical properties and water regime of forest soils in the central part of the Kamchatka River valley (using the Kozyrevsky forestry as an example). Pochvoved., 1961, no. 10, pp. 30–43. (In Russ.).
37. Wigley T.M., Briffa K.R., Jones P.D. On the average value of correlated time series, with applications in dendroclimatology and hydrometeorology. J. Appl Met. Clim., 1984, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 201–213.
38. Zang C., Biondi F. Treeclim: an R package for the numerical calibration of proxy-climate relationships. Ecography, 2015, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 431–436.
39. Zavadskaya A., Nikolaeva Е., Sazhina V., Shpilenok T., Shuvalova O. Ekonomicheskaya otsenka prirodnykh resursov i ekosistemnykh uslug Kronotskogo zapovednika i Yuzhno-Kamchatskogo zakaznika [Economic Assessment of Natural Resources and Ecosystem Services of the Kronotsky Nature Reserve and the South Kamchatka Nature Reserve]. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskii: Kamchatpress Publ., 2017. 244 p.
40. Zianis D. Predicting mean aboveground forest biomass and its associated variance. For. Ecol. Manage, 2008, vol. 256, no. 6, pp. 1400–1407.
41. Zonn S.V., Karpachevskii L.O., Stefin V.V. Lesnye pochvy Kamchatki [Forest Soils of Kamchatka]. Moscow, 1963. 255 p.
Review
For citations:
Dolgova E.A., Bushueva I.S., Bichurin R.R., Kuznetzova V.V., Matskovsky V.V., Semenyak N.S. Assessment of Mixed Forest Stand Biomass in Kamchatka Using Tree-Rings. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2025;89(5):828-842. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697525050097
JATS XML





























