Preview

Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya

Advanced search

Geographical features of social differentiation of contemporary belgian society

https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2014-6-40-52

Abstract

A distinctive feature of the social differentiation of the Belgian society is the coexistence of two opposing processes: pillarisation and depillarisation. Pillarisation is a kind of political and social structure of the nation characterized by its division into several pillars (zuilen), inside of which most social contacts are concentrated. Depillarisation as the opposite process first appeared in Belgium in the 1970s. Pillarisation of the Belgian society is connected with the lack of strong centralization of power due to historical and geographical features of the country’s formation and polycentric spatial and administrative structure. Specifics of pillarization in Belgium is its imposition on the 200-year-old confl ict between northern and southern parts of the country. The main reasons of depillarisation are secularization, individualistic type of society, privatization and the evolution of migration. But despite the Belgians desire to minimize the influence of pillarisation, the system of pillars is still having an impact on people’s daily life. In Wallonia the traditional dominance of the Socialist Party persists, as well as fairly close connection between organizations associated themselves with French-speaking socialist pillar. At the same time in Flanders people tend to eradicate every reminder of pillarisation, although the pillars are still alive in their minds. The authors are inclined to believe that there is a possibility of a new phase of pillarisation’s intensifi cation in Belgium but political preferences will no longer play the decisive role as they used to before. The reasons are the increase of nationalist spirits and the loss of trust among the electorate to the three traditional parties.

About the Authors

V. V. Akimov
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation


D. S. Yelmanova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Аксенова Л.А. Бельгия. М.: Мысль, 1982. 136 c.

2. Елманова Д.С. Фламандско-валлонские взаимоотношения: конфликт или стимул развития Бельгии? // Региональные исследования. 2010. № 4 (30). С. 76–82.

3. Елманова Д.С., Акимова В.В., Васильев А.П., Ключников М.И. Проблемы социальной дифференциации современного бельгийского общества // Территориальная организация общества и управление в регионах. Воронеж: Воронежский государственный педагогический университет, 2012. С. 121–126.

4. Колосов В.А. Территориальная идентичность и межэтнические отношения // Полис. 2001. № 2. С. 61–77.

5. Малые страны Западной Европы / Отв. редактор. Юданов Ю.И. М.: Мысль, 1984. 396 с.

6. Миретина М.С. К вопросу об обострении языковой ситуации в Бельгии // Древняя и Новая Романия. Вып. 12. 2013. C. 185–194.

7. Намазова А.С. Бельгия. Эволюция государственности в XVIII–XX веках. М.: Наука. 2008. 392 с.

8. Стрелецкая Л.Н. Бельгия. М.: Географгиз, 1962. 240 c.

9. Bitsch M.-T. Histoire de la Belgique: de l’Antiquité à nos jours. Bruxelles: Editions Complexe. 2004. 299 p.

10. Conflict and coexistence in Belgium: The dynamics of a culturally divided society / Ed. by Lijphart A. Berkeley: Institute of international studies. University of California. 1980. 171 p.

11. Delwit P., Pilet J.-B., van Haute E. Les partis politiques en Belgique. Bruxelles: Editions de l‘Université de Bruxelles. 2011. 370 p.

12. Dewachter W. Changes in a Particracy: The Belgian Party System from 1944 to 1986 // Party Systems in Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Belgium / Ed. by H. Daalder. London: Francis Pinter. 1986. P. 285–363.

13. Dobbelaere K. Professionalization and Secularization in the Belgian Catholic Pillar // Japanese J. Religious Studies. № 6 (1–2), Tokyo. 1979. P. 39–64.

14. Fitzmaurice J. The politics of Belgium. A unique federalism. London: Hurst&Company. 1996. 304 р.

15. Govaert S. Le débat sur le verzuiling en Flandre // Courrier hebdomadaire CRISP № 1329–1991. 26 p.

16. Huyse L. Political conflict in bicultural Belgium // Conflict and coexistence in Belgium: The dynamics of a culturally divided society / Ed. by Lijphart A. Berkeley: Institute of international studies. University of California. 1980. P. 107–126.

17. Koole R. Dutch Political Parties: Money and the Message. // Comparative Political Finance Among the Democracies / Ed. by Herbert E. Shiratori A. and R. / Boulder CO: Westview Press. 1994. P. 119–121.

18. Kriesi H. Federalism and Pillarization: The Netherlands and Switzerland Compared. Acta Politica 25. 1990. P. 433–450.

19. Lorwin V.R. Segmented Pluralism: Ideological Cleavages and Political Cohesion in the Smaller European Democracies // Comparative Politics. V. 3. 1971. P. 141–175.

20. Party and party systems in liberal democracies / Ed. by Wolinetz S. B. London: Routledge. 1988. 333 p.

21. Sägesser C., Cultes et laïcité // Dossiers de CRISP № 78 (2011). 32 p.

22. http://www.elections2010.belgium.be/


Review

For citations:


Akimov V.V., Yelmanova D.S. Geographical features of social differentiation of contemporary belgian society. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2014;(6):40-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2014-6-40-52

Views: 733


ISSN 2587-5566 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6975 (Online)