Assessment of Natural Recreational System in the Areas of Inaccessibility
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556620030085
Abstract
In uninhabited territories points are allocated—the poles of inaccessibility—maximum remoted from any infrastructure. Around them the areas of inaccessibility are formed, on all sides limited by different infrastructural objects. The poles of inaccessibility can be allocated to different scales: municipal, regional, national-continental and planetary. In each of them there is a special system for organizing recreation. The set of elements of recreation, which are different in function, determines the recreation in the areas of inaccessibility and constitutes the natural recreation system. It reflects interaction of tourists and recreationists, unpopulated natural territories and controlling bodies that register, search and rescue tourist groups. In the article the formula to calculate the recreational potential of the natural recreation system was formulated. It takes into account economic activity, accessibility, climate, relief, and landscape attractiveness. The maximum value of natural recreation system’ potential is equal to 20 points (each criterion of five may have a maximum value of 4 points). The areas of inaccessibility of the microlevel surrounding Perm were studied. Their recreational potential of the natural recreation system was 14 points, which corresponds to the average level. The area of the inaccessibility of the Perm krai was also investigated. Its recreational potential ranged from 13 to 17 points, which corresponds to the average and high levels. Using the formula and GIS technology allows to determine territories for development recreational and tourist activities and creating protected natural areas.
References
1. Adashova T.A. Antarctica through the eyes of a tourist. Sovrem. Probl. Servisa i Turizma, 2014, no. 1, pp. 53—60. (In Russ.).
2. Alekseev S.S. Tsvetovedenie [Color Science]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1973. 148 p.
3. Armand D.L. Point scales in geography. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 1973, no. 2, pp. 11—24. (In Russ.).
4. Baryshnikov A.P. Perspektiva [Perspective]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1955. 200 p.
5. Bogdanov E.I., Kostryukova O.N., Orlovskaya V.P., Fenin P.M. Planirovanie napredpriyatii turizma: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov [Planning for Tourism Companies: the Handbook for University Students]. St. Petersburg: Dom Biznes-Pressa 2 Publ., 2003. 288 p.
6. Vedenin Yu.A., Miroshnichenko N.N. Assessment of natural conditions for recreation. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 1969, no. 4, pp. 51-60. (In Russ.).
7. Velichkovskii B.M. Sovremennaya kognitivnaya psi-khologiya [Modern Cognitive Psychology]. Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1982. 336 p.
8. Dzhandzhugazova E.A. Formation of the development strategy of the regional tourist and recreational complex. Doctoral (Econ.) Dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2005. 204 p.
9. Dirin D.A. Otsenka i rekreatsionnoe ispol’zovanie pei-zazhno-esteticheskikh resursov Ust’-Koksinskogo raiona Respubliki Altai [Evaluation and Recreational Use of Landscape-Aesthetic Resources of the Ust-Koksinsky District of the Altai Republic]. Novosibirsk: Inst. Vodn. Ekol. Probl. Sib. Otd. Akad. Nauk, 2007. 206 p.
10. Dirin D.A., Popov E.S., Nikolaeva O.P. Aesthetic-recreation resources in mountainous part of Altai krai. Mir Nauki, Kul’tury, Obrazovaniya, 2010, no. 6-1, pp. 262269. (In Russ.).
11. Drozdov A.V. Turistskie resursy i turistskii produkt na-tsional’nykh parkov Rossii [Tourist Resources and Tourist Product of National Parks of Russia]. Moscow: Eko-Tsentr “Zapovedniki”, 2000. 61 p.
12. Zyryanov A.I., Mirolyubova T.V. Methodological approaches to the study of development of the region from the perspective of new economic and theoretical geography. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2014, no. 5, pp. 2331. (In Russ.).
13. Zyryanov A.I., Myshlyavtseva S.E. Touristic clusters of Perm krai. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2012, no. 2, pp. 13-20. (In Russ.).
14. Isachenko A.G. Metody prikladnykh landshaftnykh issledovanii [Methods of Applied Landscape Research]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1980. 224 p.
15. Kolbovskii E.Yu. Ekologicheskii turizm i ekologiya turizma: ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenii [Ecotourism and Ecology of Tourism: the Handbook for University Students]. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 2006. 256 p.
16. Korolev A.Yu. Geographical features of inaccessibility poles of Northern Hemisphere of the Earth. Vestn. Ud-murtskogo Univ., Ser. Biol. Nauki o Zemle, 2012, no. 2, pp. 149-152. (In Russ.).
17. Korolev A.Yu. Inaccessibility poles of the Perm krai. Reg. Issled., 2014, no. 1, pp. 130-132. (In Russ.).
18. Kotlyarov E.A. Geografiya otdykha i turizma [Geography of Recreation and Tourism]. Moscow, 1978. 240 p.
19. Mel’nikov I.A. To the pole of relative inaccessibility. Priroda, 2013, no. 7 (1175), pp. 92-96. (In Russ.).
20. Mironenko N.S., Tverdokhlebov I.T. Rekreatsionnaya geografiya [Recreational Geography]. Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1981. 207 p.
21. Mukhina L.I., Savel’eva V.V. Features of the recreational assessment of the midland areas (on the example of Arkhyz). Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 1973, no. 1, pp. 95-102. (In Russ.).
22. Myshlyavtseva S.E. Tourist and recreational justification for the creation of the Usvinsky Natural Park in the Gremyachinsky and Chusovsky districts of the Perm krai. Geogr. Vestn., 2012, no. 4(23), pp. 89-96. (In Russ.).
23. Nefedova V.B., Smvirnova E.D., Shvidchenko L.G. Methods of recreational assessment of territories. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr, 1973, no. 5, pp. 49 -54. (In Russ.).
24. Nikolaev V.A. Aesthetic perception of the landscape. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 1999, no. 6, pp. 1015. (In Russ.).
25. Nikolaev V.A. Landshaftovedenie: estetika i dizain [Landscape Science: Aesthetics and Design]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ., 2003. 176 p.
26. Preobrazhenskii V.S., Vedenin Yu.A. Geografiya i ot-dykh: izuchenie organizatsii i planirovaniya zon otdykha [Geography and Recreation: The Study of the Organization and Planning of Recreation Areas]. Moscow: Znanie Publ., 1971. 48 p.
27. Preobrazhenskii V.S., Vedenin Yu.A., Zorin I.V., Mukhina L.I. Territorial recreational system as an object of study of geographical sciences. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 1974, no. 2, pp. 34-42. (In Russ.).
28. Rodoman B.B. Polyarizovannaya biosfera [The Polarized Biosphere]. Smolensk: Oikumena Publ., 2002. 336 p.
29. Safaryan A.A. Special features of tourism studies in the mountain regions of the world. Geogr. Vestn., 2015, no. 2(33), pp. 110-116. (In Russ.).
30. Safaryan A.A. Approaches to the estimation of the tourism potential of the territory. Geogr. Vestn., 2015, no. 1(32), pp. 89-102. (In Russ.).
31. Suprunenko Y.P. Gory zovut... (Gorno-rekreatsionnoe prirodopol’zovanie) [The Mountains are Calling ... (Mountain and Recreational Use of Nature)]. Moscow: Trovant Publ., 2003. 368 p.
32. Talalai P.G., Markov A.N. The Gamburtsev Mountains - a ridge that no one has ever seen. Priroda, 2012, no. 2 (1158), pp. 29-38. (In Russ.).
33. Tarasov A.N. Experience in tourist classification of Caucasian forests. In Vopr. Razvitiya Turizma [Problems of Tourism Development]. Sukhumi, 1973, pp. 28-33. (In Russ.).
34. Teoreticheskie osnovy rekreatsionnoi geografii [Theoretical Foundations of Recreational Geography]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1975. 223 p.
35. Tkhamitlokova Yu.O. Methodological approaches to assessing and analyzing the resource potential of tourism and recreation. In Nauchn. forum: Ekonomika i menedzhment: sb. st. po materialam IV mezhdunar nauchn.-prakt. konf [Sci. Forum: Economics and Management: Materials of the IV Int. Sci.-Practical Conf.], no. 2(4). Moscow: MTsNO Publ., 2017, pp. 49-55. (In Russ.).
36. Faibusovich E.L., Chechetova L.V. Methods for assessing the natural conditions for tourism. In Kraevedenie i Turizm [Local History and Tourism]. Leningrad, 1973, pp. 3-15. (In Russ.).
37. Frolova M.Yu. Evaluation of the aesthetic advantages of natural landscapes. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 1994, no. 2, рр. 27-33. (In Russ.).
38. Khuden’kikh Yu.A. Approaches to the assessment of the tourist potential of the territory on the example of areas of the Perm krai. Geografija i Turizm, 2006, no. 2, pp. 217-230. (In Russ.).
39. Chibileva V.P. Assessment of the recreational potential of the southern regions of the Orenburg oblast in the context of spatial planning. Vestn. Orenburg. Gos. Univ., 2011, no. 12(131), pp. 268-269. (In Russ.).
40. Eringis K.I., Budryunas A.-R.A. The essence and methods of detailed ecological and aesthetic research of landscapes. In Ekologiya i Estetika Landshafta [Ecology and Aesthetics of Landscape]. Vilnius: Mintis Publ., 1975, pp. 107-170. (In Russ.).
41. Allan J.R., Venter O., Maxwell S., Bertzky B., Jones K., Shi Y., Watson J.E. Recent increases in human pressure and forest loss threaten many Natural World Heritage Sites. Biol. Conserv., 2017, vol. 206, pp. 47-55.
42. Fines K.D. Landscape evaluation: a research project in East-Sassex. Reg. Stud., 1968, vol. 2, no. 1, рр. 41-55.
43. Gorelick N., Hancher M., Dixon M., Ilyushchenko S., Thau D., Moore R. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ, 2017, vol. 202, pp. 18-27.
44. Hansen M.C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 2013, vol. 342, pp. 850-853. doi: 10.1126/science.1244693
45. Ibisch P.L. et al. A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status. Science, 2016, vol. 354, pp. 1423-1427. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7166
46. Linton D.L. The assesment of scenery as a natural resource. Scott. Geogr. Mag., 1968, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 219238.
47. Nelson A. Travel Time to Major Cities: a Global Map of Accessibility. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2008. doi: 10.2788/95835
48. Ribeiro J.C., Vareiro L.C. The tourist potential of the Minho-Lima region (Portugal). In Visions for Global Tourism Industry: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Strategies. Kasimoglu M., Ed. BoD—Books on Demand, 2012, pp. 339-356.
49. Weiss D.J. et al. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature, 2018, vol. 553, pp. 333-336. doi: 10.1038/nature25181
Graphical Abstract
|
|
1. Оценка потенциала ПРС на территории ареала недоступности Пермского края | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(959KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
2. Assessment of the potential of NRS in the territory of the inaccessibility area of the Perm region | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(1012KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
3. PDF | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(4MB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
- Poles of inaccessibility are the points on uninhabited territories as far as possible from infrastructure.
- Around the poles are formed areas of inaccessibility, bounded by infrastructure facilities.
- Areas are of various scales: municipal, regional, national/continental, and planetary.
- A natural recreational system is a combination of areas of inaccessibility, tourists and regulatory authorities.
- The recreational potential of the natural recreational system is determined as: Pnrs = E + A + C + R + L, where E stands for economic activity, A is accessibility, C is climate, R is relief, and L is landscape attractiveness.
Review
For citations:
Korolev A.Yu. Assessment of Natural Recreational System in the Areas of Inaccessibility. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2020;84(3):369-383. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556620030085
Views:
601
Email this article 
