Surface Water Hydroecological Peculiarities of Eastern Donbass Coal-Mining Areas
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556620030139
Abstract
For the first time a new approach has been developed to assess the water quality of the Eastern Donbass rivers in the zone of man-made mine waters’ influence. The approach is based on the data of hydrochemical studies and surface water toxicity assessment by the results of biotest analysis. The approach basis is the use of regional background, a complex of hydrochemical and biotest data on a set of biotesting. The scale of water quality integrated assessment with the allocation of 5 classes has been developed. The rating scale takes into account water pollution degree according to analytical data and toxicity degree, including options for combining the results of the three bioassays. Water quality assessment results showed that within the Seversky Donets and Tuzlov basins it varies as a whole from the 2nd class (“slightly polluted”) to the 4th class (“heavily polluted”), according to the toxicity level-from 1st class (“conditionally non-toxic”) to the 3rd class (“toxic”). Analytical methods data are not always consistent with biotest analysis results, which is associated with different bioavailability of pollutants to biome. The final river waters quality assessment should be carried out taking into account the waters class according to hydrochemical data and with indication of the possible toxicants’ bioavailability for aquatic organisms.
About the Authors
V. E. ZakrutkinRussian Federation
Rostov-on-Don
O. S. Reshetnyak
Russian Federation
Rostov-on-Don
E. N. Bakaeva
Russian Federation
Rostov-on-Don, Moscow
References
1. Bakaeva E.N., Nikanorov A.M. Biological approaches to the assessment of the ecotoxicological state of aquatic ecosystems. Izv. Vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskii Reg., Ser. Estestv. Nauki, 2015, no. 1, pp. 72-83. (In Russ.).
2. Bulgakov N.G., Levich A.P., Maksimov V.N. Forecast of the state of ecosystems and rationing of environmental factors in water bodies of the Lower Don. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Biol., 1995, no. 2, pp. 218-255. (In Russ.).
3. Bulgakov N.G., Levich A.P., Maksimov V.N. Regional environmental control based on biotic and abiotic monitoring data. In Ekologicheskii monitoring [Environmental Monitoring], vol. 5. Gelashvili D.B., Ed. Nizhny Novgorod: Nizhegorodskii Gos. Univ., 1998, pp. 93-259. (In Russ.).
4. Voprosy ekologicheskogo normirovaniya i razrabotka sistemy otsenivaniya sostoyaniya vodoemov [Problems of Environmental Regulation and Development of a System for Assessing the State of Reservoirs]. Pavlov D.S., Rozenberg G.S., Shatunovskii M.I., Eds. Moscow: KMK Publ., 2011. 196 p.
5. Zakrutkin V.E., Sklyarenko G.Yu., Bakaeva E.N., Reshetnyak O.S., Gibkov E.V., Fomenko N.E. Po-verkhnostnye i podzemnye vody v predelakh tekhnogenno narushennykh geosistem Vostochnogo Donbassa: formiro-vanie khimicheskogo sostava i otsenka kachestva [Surface and Groundwater within the Technologically Disturbed Geosystems of the Eastern Donbass: the Formation of the Chemical Composition and Quality Assessment]. Rostov-on-Don: Yuzhn. Federal’n. Univ., 2016. 170 p.
6. Zakrutkin V.E., Gibkov E.V., Sklyarenko G.Yu., Reshetnyak O.S. Comparative assessment of the quality of surface and groundwater of Eastern Donbass by hydrochemical indicators. Izv. Vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskii Reg., Ser. Estestv. Nauki, 2016, no. 2, pp. 91—99. (In Russ.).
7. Zakrutkin V.E., Reshetnyak O.S., Babayan G.G., Gibkov E.V., Saakyan G.A., Reshetnyak V.N. Modern chemical composition and trends of spatial and temporal variability in the quality of river waters in Eastern Donbass. Izv. Vuzov. Severo-Kavkazskii Reg., Ser. Estestv. Nauki, 2017, no. 2, pp. 101 — 109. (In Russ.).
8. Nikanorov A.M. Nauchnye osnovy monitoringa kachestva vod [Scientific Basis for Water Quality Monitoring]. St. Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 2005. 576 p.
9. Nikanorov A.M., Bryzgalo V.A., Reshetnyak O.S., Kosmenko L.S. Rationale for the development of regional criteria for assessing water quality and the status of aquatic ecosystems. In Sbornik trudov V Mezhdun-arodnogo kongressa “CHistaya voda. Kazan’” 26—28 marta 2014g. [Proc. V Int. Congress “Clean Water. Kazan” 26—28 March 2014]. Kazan: Kuranty Publ., 2014, pp. 149-152. (In Russ.).
10. RD 52.24.566-94. Recommendations. Methods of Toxicological Assessment of Pollution of Freshwater Ecosystems. Moscow: FSR Goskomgidrometa, 1994. 130 p. (In Russ.).
11. RD 52.24.635-2002. Methodical Instructions. Observation of Toxic Pollution of Bottom Sediments in Freshwater Ecosystems Based on Biotesting. St. Petersburg: Gidrometeoizdat Publ., 2002. 31 p. (In Russ.).
12. RD 52.24.662-2004. Assessment of Toxic Pollution of Natural Waters and Bottom Sediments of Freshwater Ecosystems by Biotesting Using Rotifers. Moscow: Meteoagenstvo Rosgidrometa, 2006. 60 p. (In Russ.).
13. Reshetnyak O.S, Zakrutkin V.E., Gibkov E.V. Trace elements in the river waters of the Eastern Donbass. In Geoekologicheskie problemy uglepromyshlennykh territorii [Geoecological Problems of Coal-Mining Territories]. Rostov-on-Don: Yuzhn. Fed. Univ., 2015, pp. 283-295. (In Russ.).
14. Reshetnyak O.S. Methodological aspects of assessing the variability of river ecosystems. In Aktual’nye problemy nauk o Zemle [Actual Problems of Earth Sciences.]. Rostov-on-Don: Yuzhn. Fed. Univ., 2015, pp. 407409. (In Russ.).
15. Saet Yu.E., Revich B.A., Yanin E.P., et al. Geokhimiya okruzhayushcheisredy [Environmental Geochemistry]. Moscow: Nedra Publ., 1990. 335 p.
16. Shitikov V.K., Rozenberg G.S., Zinchenko T.D. Kolichestvennaya gidroekologiya: metody sistemnoi identifikatsii [Quantitative Hydroecology: Methods of System Identification]. Tolyatti: Inst. Ekol. Volzhskogo Basseina Akad. Nauk, 2003. 463 p.
17. Yanin E.P. Tekhnogennye geokhimicheskie assotsiatsii v donnykh otlozheniyakh malykh rek (sostav, osobennosti, metody otsenki) [Technogenic Geochemical Associations in Bottom Sediments of Small Rivers (Composition, Features, Assessment Methods)]. Moscow: IMGRE, 2002. 52 p.
18. Mauer F.L., Ellersieck M.R. Manual of Acute Toxicity Interpretation and Data Base for 410 Chemical and 66 Species of Freshwater Animals. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1986. 63 p.
19. Schudoma D. Environmental Quality Objectives for Hazardous Substances in Aquatic Environment. Berlin: Unweltbundesamt, 2001. 181 p.
Graphical Abstract
![]() |
1. PDF | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
Download
(3MB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
- A new approach has been developed to assess the water quality of the Eastern Donbass’s rivers located in the area of influence of the existing and liquidated coal-mining facilities.
- The approach is based on the use of two criteria: (1) the total water pollution index calculated relative to the hydrochemical background, and (2) the level of water toxicity based on the results of bioassay.
- The river water quality in the region (the Seversky Donets and Tuzlov river basins) varies from ‘low-polluted’ to ‘heavily-polluted’ with a negative tendency in the Tuzlov basin.
Review
For citations:
Zakrutkin V.E., Reshetnyak O.S., Bakaeva E.N. Surface Water Hydroecological Peculiarities of Eastern Donbass Coal-Mining Areas. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2020;84(3):451-460. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556620030139