Identity of the Kaliningrad Oblast Inhabitants: The Impact of Social Beliefs on the Choice of Self-Identification
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556621040117
Abstract
Highlighting the ideologically significant factors but paying little attention to the personal beliefs and mindsets are common for publications considering the identity of the Kaliningrad Oblast inhabitants. At best, the authors refer to local myths and stereotypes. To address this shortcoming, we suggest considering the identity as a reflexive construction, strengthened by narratives and controlled by social practices. The paper is aimed to show how the refocusing of thinking of social reality was affecting the Kaliningrad Oblast’s society during the last decade and to reveal its impact on the self-identification of Kaliningrad Oblast inhabitants. The research is based on the interviews carried out by the authors in the summer of 2020. The results of the content analyses of the text materials were compared with the data of previous surveys and research. The analysis reveals that the two opposing cultural phenomena are essential for the regional society: the first is “outdating,” a reflection on the current processes and changes in terms which are relevant for previous periods; and the second is “outscoring,” an introduction of the narratives and practices typical for the post-modern society. The authors hypothesize that the current level of pluralism achieved by the regional society, as well as the combination of the traditional and modern values, provide the necessary resilience for the identity of the Kaliningrad Oblast inhabitants and make it possible to consider this identity as a driver of the regional development. Nevertheless, the current balance is fragile, and it can be threatened by the discrepancy between the politics of identity retention, managed by the traditional state-oriented tools, and the reflexivity of modern individuals, which are weakly regulated by traditions, social prescriptions, or ascriptions. This hypothesis requires further verification.
About the Authors
O. I. VendinaRussian Federation
Moscow
A. A. Gritsenko
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. V. Zotova
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. S. Zinovyev
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
References
1. Abylkalikov S.I., Sazin V.S. The main results of migration processes in the Kaliningrad region according to the census and microcensus data of 1989–2015. Baltiiskii Region, 2019, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 32–50. (In Russ.). doi 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-2-3
2. Alexander J.C. Critical reflection on “reflexive modernization”. Theory Cult. Soc., 1996, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 133–138.
3. Alimpieva A.V. Kaliningraders: the problem of social identity. In Identichnost’ v kontekste globalizatsii: Evropa, Rossiya, SShA [Identity in the Context of Globalization: Europe, Russia, the USA]. Kaliningrad: Balt. Fed. Univ. im. Kanta, 2003, pp. 169–176. (In Russ.).
4. Alimpieva A.V. Social identity in the context of cultural diversity: search or imposition? (on the example of the Kaliningrad region). Vestn. Balt. Fed. Univ. im. I. Kanta, 2014, no. 11, pp. 60–66. (In Russ.).
5. Alimpieva A.V. Social identity of Kaliningraders in the social and geopolitical context. Pskov. Regionol. Zh., 2009, no. 7, pp. 36–40. (In Russ.).
6. Andersen B. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso Publ., 1991. 224 p.
7. Andreichuk N.V., Gavrilina L.M. Fenomen kaliningradskoi regional’noi subkul’tury (sotsial’no-filosofskii i kul’turologicheskii analiz) [The Phenomenon of the Kaliningrad Regional Subculture (Socio-Philosophical and Cultural Analysis)]. Kaliningrad: Ross. Gos. Univ. im. Kanta, 2011. 139 p.
8. Archer M. Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007. 352 p.
9. Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Traditions and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 1994. 228 p.
10. Berendeev M. “Who are we?”: Kaliningradians in search of identity. Sotsiol. Issled., 2007, no. 4, pp. 127–132. (In Russ.).
11. Brubaker R., Cooper F. Beyond “identity”. Theory Soc., 2000, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–47. doi 10.1023/a:1007068714468
12. Chaffee D. Reflexive identities. In Routledge Handbook of Identity Studies. Routledge, 2019, pp. 118–129. doi 10.4324/9781315626024-7
13. Craib I. Experiencing Identity. London: Sage, 1998. 208 p.
14. Drobizheva L.M. Civil identity as a condition for the weakening of ethnic negativism. Mir Rossii, 2017, no. 1, pp. 7–31. (In Russ.).
15. Erikson E.H. Identity: Youth and Crisis. W.W. Norton Publ., 1968. 336 p.
16. Erikson E.H. The problem of ego identity. J. Am. Psycho-anal. Assoc., 1956, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 56–121.
17. Fedorov V.V. A popular variant of identity. Ekonomicheskie Strategii, 2008, no. 3, pp. 60–67. (In Russ.).
18. Gavrilova K.A. Chud’ on Pinega and in the vicinity: 5+ lives of one controversial category. In Svoi i chuzhye. Metamorfozy identichnosti na vostoke i zapade Evropy [Ours and Others. Metamorphoses of Identity in the East and West of Europe]. Moscow: Goryachaya Liniya – Telecom Publ., 2018, pp. 271–337. (In Russ.).
19. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford Univ. Press, 1991. 256 p.
20. Gurevich P.S. The problem of human identity in philosophical anthropology. In Voprosy Sotsial’noi Teorii [Problems of Social Theory]. Vol. 4: Chelovek v poiskakh identichnosti [Human in Search of Identity]. 2010, pp. 63–87. (In Russ.).
21. Huntington S.P. Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity. Simon and Schuster Publ., 2005. 444 p.
22. Inglehart R., Welzel Ch. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005. 344 p.
23. Kalashnikov K.N., Budilov A.P. The contours of the sociocultural identity of the inhabitants of the Kaliningrad region. Epokha Nauki, 2019, no. 20, pp. 513–519. (In Russ.).
24. Klemeshev A., Fedorov G., Fidrya E. Specific Kaliningrad character of the Russian identity. Bull. Geogr. Socio-Econ. Ser., 2017, vol. 38, pp. 47–55.
25. Klemeshev A.P., Fedorov G.M. Kaliningrad society: according to the results of sociological surveys in 2001– 2004. Region Sotrudnichestva, 2004, no. 6, pp. 4–43. (In Russ.).
26. Kostyashov Yu.V. Sekretnaya istoriya Kaliningradskoi oblasti: ocherki 1945–1956 gg. [The Secret History of the Kaliningrad Region: Essays 1945–1956]. Kaliningrad: Terra Baltika Publ., 2009. 352 p.
27. Kostyashov Yu.V. Settlement of the Kaliningrad region after the World War II. In Gumanitarnaya nauka v Rossii [Humanitarian Science in Russia]. Moscow, 1996, vol. 2, pp. 82–87. (In Russ.).
28. Kretinin G.V. About the origins of the formation of the historical memory of the inhabitants of the Kaliningrad region (1945–1960). Vestn. Balt. Fed. Univ. im. I. Kanta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i Obshchestvennye Nauki, 2015, no. 12, pp. 61–66. (In Russ.).
29. Kuznetsov I.M. Value orientations and socio-political attitudes of Russians. Sotsiol. Issled., 2017, no. 1, pp. 47–55. (In Russ.).
30. Kuznetsov I.M. Variation of the discourse of patriotism in the everyday consciousness of Russians. Vlast’, 2016, no. 7, pp. 164–171. (In Russ.).
31. Lovkina Yu.Yu., Alimpiyeva A.V. Discourses of identification and the problem of constructing identity. Vestn. Balt. Fed. Univ. im. I. Kanta, 2015, vol. 12, pp. 89–96. (In Russ.).
32. Martynova M.Yu. Kaliningraders: geopolitical challenges and regional subculture. Geopoliticheskii Zh., 2014b, no. 3, pp. 2–20. (In Russ.).
33. Martynova M.Yu. On the history of the formation of ethnocultural strategies of Kaliningraders. In Etnokul’turnye protsessy Grodnenskogo Poneman’ya v proshlom i nastoyashchem [Ethnocultural Processes of the Grodno Neman Region in the Past and Present]. Minsk, 2014a, pp. 407–424. (In Russ.).
34. Martynova M.Yu., Grigor’eva R.A. Ethnocultural situation and identity of the population of the Kaliningrad region. In Etnicheskoe i religioznoe mnogoobrazie Rossii [Ethnic and Religious Diversity of Russia]. Moscow: IEA RAN, 2018a, pp. 323–349. (In Russ.).
35. Martynova M.Yu., Grigor’eva R.A. Geopolitical position of the Kaliningrad region and life strategies of its young residents: Risk assessment. Vestn. Diplomaticheskoi Akademii MID Rossii. Rossiya i Mir, 2018b, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 128–144. (In Russ.).
36. Shakhov V.A. Kaliningrad exclave: sociocultural paradigm of the “Russian island” of the South-Eastern Baltic. Kul’tura i Tsivilizatsiya, 2017, vol. 7, no. 4A, pp. 774– 783. (In Russ.).
37. Shakhov V.A. Kto my?: russkie Prineman’ya ili rossiiskie balty [Who Are We?: Russians of the Neman region or Russian Balts]. Kaliningrad: Yantarnyi Skaz Publ., 2002. 134 p.
38. Vendina O.I. Border cities: A test of ethno-cultural diversity. Part 2: Cities on the modern borders of the Russian Federation. Gorodskie Issled. i Praktiki, 2016, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 7–26. (In Russ.). doi 10.17323/usp1420167-25
39. Vostochnaya Prussiya glazami sovetskikh pereselentsev: Pervye gody Kaliningradskoi oblasti v vospominaniyakh i dokumentakh [Eastern Prussia through the Eyes of the Soviet Settlers: The First Years of the Kaliningrad Region in Memoirs and Documents]. Kostyashov Yu.V., Ed. Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad. Kniga Publ., 2018, 3d ed. 364 p.
40. Zadorin I.V. Regions of the “frontier”: Territorial identity and perception of “specialness”. Politiya, 2018, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 102–136. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Vendina O.I., Gritsenko A.A., Zotova M.V., Zinovyev A.S. Identity of the Kaliningrad Oblast Inhabitants: The Impact of Social Beliefs on the Choice of Self-Identification. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2021;85(4):565-578. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556621040117