Assessment of Damage to Recreational Infrastructure and Water Users from Floods on Rivers (the Case of the Charysh River, Altai Krai)
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556621060042
Abstract
Recreational water use is a mandatory part of summer recreation. Due to the global economic crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, recreation has shifted from the seas to the rivers. Hydrological and geomorphological processes affect river reclamation sites, causing significant damage to ecosystems, infrastructure, and population. To determine the adequacy of the Russian methodology for calculating the amount of probabilistic damage for cases of assessing damage to the recreational complex and vacationers during f loods, an analytical study was conducted. Using the case of the Charysh River basin (river length is 547 km, the basin area is 22.2 thousand km2; 16 objects of rural tourism) it is shown that in the event of a f lood of 1% security, damage can reach RUB 1232 thousand and 283 ha of recreationally significant areas. It is also established that the methodology does not reflect the specifics of recreational activities and recreational water use. The results of the assessment are distorted due to the complexity of identifying economic agents and objects of dangerous influence. The current methodology does not consider the damage caused to ecosystems and vacationers. It is proposed to consider these factors and to detail the assessment using an industry methodology.
About the Authors
I. V. AndreevaRussian Federation
S. V. Tsilikina
Russian Federation
References
1. Abbott T. Shifting shorelines and political winds – The complexities of implementing the simple idea of shore line setbacks for oceanfront developments in Maui, Hawaii. Ocean Coast. Manag., 2013, vol. 73, pp. 13–21.
2. Anagnostou C., Antoniou P.F., Hatiris G.A. Erosion of a depositional coast in NE Rhodos island (SE Greece) and assessment of the best available measures for coast protection. J. Coast. Res., 2011, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1316–1319.
3. Andreeva I.V., Tsilikina S.V. Availability of recreational water use in the territories of perspective recreational development in the regions of the Upper Ob regions. Izv. Altai. Otd. Russ. Geogr. O-va, 2018, no. 4, pp. 5–16. (In Russ.).
4. Andreeva I.V., Tsilikina S.V. Landscape-geographical method of spatial assessment of water resource potential for recreational water use purposes. Vodn. Khozyaistvo Ross., 2017, no. 5, pp. 34–50. (In Russ.).
5. Avakyan A.B., Istomina M.N. Natural and anthropogenic causes of floods. Strategiya Grazhdanskoi Zashchity: Probl. i Issled., 2013, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 269–281. (In Russ.).
6. Bredikhin A.V. Organization of recreational and geomorphological systems. Doctoral Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Moscow, 2008. 377 p.
7. Bredikhin A.V. Recreational properties of relief. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2004, no. 6, pp. 24–30. (In Russ.).
8. Bredikhin A.V. Rekreatsionno-geomorfologicheskie sistemy [Recreational and Geomorphological Systems]. Smolensk: Oikumena Publ., 2010. 328 p.
9. Ezebilo E.E., Boman M., Mattsson L., Lindhagen A., Mbongo W. Preferences and willingness to pay for close to home nature for outdoor recreation in Sweden. J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 2015, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 283–296.
10. Ignatov E.I. Beregovye morfosistemy [Coastal Morphosystems]. Smolensk: Madzhenta Publ., 2004. 362 p.
11. Ignatov E.I. Coastal morphosystems of Primorye. Doctoral Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Moscow, 2005. 339 p.
12. Jimenez J.A., Valdemoro H.I., Bosom E., Sanchez-Arcilla A., Nicholls R.J. Impacts of sea-level rise-induced erosion on the Catalan coast. Reg. Environ. Change, 2017, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 593–603.
13. Kennedy D.M., Ierodiaconou D., Weir A., Brighton B. Wave hazards on microtidal shore platforms: testing the relationship between morphology and exposure. Nat. Hazards, 2017, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 741–755.
14. Kennedy D.M., Sherker S., Brighton B., Weir A., Woodroffe C.D. Rocky coast hazards and public safety: Moving beyond the beach in coastal risk management. Ocean Coast. Manag., 2013, vol. 82, pp. 85–94.
15. Klein A., Santana G., Diehl E., De Menezes J. Analysis of hazards associated with sea bathing: Results of five years work in oceanic beaches of Santa Catarina State, southern Brazil. J. Coast. Res., 2003, vol. 35, pp. 107–116.
16. Kont A., Jaagus J., Aunap R. Climate change scenarios and the effect of sea-level rise for Estonia. Glob. Planet. Change, 2003, vol. 36, pp. 1–15.
17. Kurepina N.Yu., Rybkina I.D. Cartographic research method of developing recommendations on prevention of water-related emergencies. Geodeziya i Kartografiya, 2021, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 23–38. (In Russ.).
18. Lankia T., Kopperoinen L., Pouta E., Neuvonen M. Valuing recreational ecosystem service f low in Finland. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., 2015, vol. 10, pp. 14–28.
19. Leatherman S.P. Rip current: science and threat communication. J. Coast. Res., 2014, vol. 72, pp. 93–95.
20. Leont’ev O.K. Geomorfologiya morskikh beregov [Geomorphology of Sea Coasts]. Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1961. 420 p.
21. Li Z.Q. Rip current hazards in South China headland beaches. Ocean Coast. Manag., 2016, vol. 121, pp. 23–32.
22. Lizarraga-Arciniega R., Appendini-Albretchsen C.M., Fischer D.W. Planning for beach erosion: A case study, Playas de Rosarito, BC Mexico. J. Coast. Res., 2001, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 636–644.
23. Lozoya J., Sarda R., Jimenez J. A methodological framework for multi-hazard risk assessment in beaches. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2011, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 685–696.
24. McGinlay J., Parsons D.J., Morris J., Graves A., Hubatova V., Bradbury R.B., Bullock J.V. Leisure activities and social factors influence the generation of cultural ecosystem service benefits. Ecosyst. Serv., 2018, vol. 31, pp. 468–480.
25. Metodika otsenki veroyatnostnogo ushcherba ot vrednogo vozdeistviya vod i otsenki effektivnosti osushchestvleniya preventivnykh vodokhozyaistvennykh meropriyatii [Methodology for Assessing the Probabilistic Damage from the Harmful Effects of Water and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Preventive Water Management Measures]. Moscow, 2005. 154 p.
26. Mikhailov V.N., Dobrovol’skii A.D., Dobrolyubov S.A. Gidrologiya: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Hydrology: Textbook]. Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola Publ., 2007. 463 p.
27. Mishurinskii D.V., Bredikhin A.V. Comprehensive assessment of the recreational-geomorphological potential of the coasts of the White and Baltic Seas. Geomorphology RAS, 2019, no. 1, pp. 38–47. doi 10.31857/S0435-42812019138-47
28. Novikov A.A., Ignatov E.I., Isaev V.S., Gorshkov E.I., Kashirina E.S. The assessment of geo-ecological risks of urban coastal areas. Geopolitika i Ekodinamika Regionov, 2018, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 100–108. (In Russ.).
29. Prirodnye opasnosti Rossii [Natural Hazards of Russia]. Vol. 5: Gidrometeorologicheskie opasnosti [Hydrometeorological Hazards]. Golitsyn G.S., Vasil’ev A.A., Eds. Moscow: KRUK Publ., 2002. 348 p.
30. Sanin A.Yu. Some features of environmental management in a coastal zone of the Crimean peninsula. Probl. Reg. Ekol., 2014, no. 1, pp. 141–148. (In Russ.).
31. Sanin A.Yu. Some features of unfavorable and dangerous phenomena within the coastal morphosistem the Southern coast of the Crimea. Probl. Reg. Ekol., 2013, no. 3, pp. 213–218. (In Russ.).
32. Simonov V.V., Osadchii O.V. The nature of the occurrence of f loods, f looding and the characteristics of their damaging factors. Nauchn. i Obrazovatel’nye Probl. Grazhdanskoi Zashchity, 2014, no. 1, pp. 9–19. (In Russ.).
33. Teoreticheskie osnovy rekreatsionnoi geografii [Theoretical Foundations of Recreational Geography]. Preobrazhenskii V.S., Ed. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1975. 223 p.
34. Zenkovich V.P. Osnovy ucheniya o razvitii morskikh beregov [Fundamentals of the Development of Sea Shores]. Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1962. 710 p.
Review
For citations:
Andreeva I.V., Tsilikina S.V. Assessment of Damage to Recreational Infrastructure and Water Users from Floods on Rivers (the Case of the Charysh River, Altai Krai). Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2021;85(6):914-923. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556621060042