Factors of Pharmaceutical Enterprises Localization—the Case of the Largest Pharmaceutical Companies in Russia
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556622020066
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to identify the factors of pharmaceutical enterprises localization in the Russian regions, including from the point of view of assessing the possible contribution of pharmaceuticals to the reduction of territorial disparities in the level of economic development. The analysis of factors of pharmaceutical production localization is carried out based on the generalization of foreign studies and the database of production enterprises of more than 50 largest pharmaceutical companies in Russia compiled by the authors (taking into account the time of construction and large-scale modernization of enterprises, belonging to Russian or foreign owners). It is concluded that in Russia, the same factors of pharmaceutical enterprises localization are emerged as abroad: the remaining importance of historically developed production centers is typical, including in the eastern regions of the country (due to the lower importance of the transport factor for the industry), often, the preference is given to expanding the capacity of existing enterprises, rather than building new ones; new plants arise on the base of developed centers of pharmaceutical research and/or with a focus on the sales markets of the largest urban agglomerations and/or in special economic zones, industrial parks. When building new enterprises, investors can seek both to participate in pharmaceutical clusters and to save on production costs, including wages—by building factories in areas that are “unsaturated” with production. The main feature of foreign investment is their arrival only in the western regions of the country due to their large sales market and proximity to the countries of companies’ origin that are mainly European. As a result of the action of numerous factors, the impact of the development of pharmaceutical production on territorial disparities is ambiguous.
About the Authors
O. V. KuznetsovaRussian Federation
Moscow
R. O. Bobrovskiy
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Aleksandrova E.A., Ivanova V.I., Kuznetsova M.Yu. The clusters and the cluster initiatives of the Russian biopharmaceutical industry: Identification, structure, and geography. Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ. Menedzhmenta, 2019, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 341–374. (In Russ.).
2. Bignami F., Mattsson P., Hoekman J. The importance of geographical distance to different types of R&D collab oration in the pharmaceutical industry. Ind. Innov., 2020, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 513–537.
3. Boasson V., Boasson E., MacPherson A., Shin H.-H. Firm value and geographic competitive advantage: Evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. J. Bus., 2005, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 2465–2495.
4. Bogachev I.I., Rodionova I.A. Main features of the Kaluga Region innovative pharmaceutical cluster development. Vestn. RUDN, Ser. Ekon., 2014, no. 1, pp. 24–34. (In Russ.).
5. Daemmrich A. Where is the Pharmacy to the World? International Regulatory Variation and Pharmaceutical Industry Location. Working Paper. Harvard Business School, 2009. 22 p. Available at:https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/09-118.pdf (accessed: 27.12.2021).
6. Demirel P., Mazzucato M. The evolution of firm growth dynamics in the US pharmaceutical industry. Reg. Stud., 2010, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1053–1066.
7. Furman J.L. Location and organizing strategy: Exploring the influence of location on the organization of pharmaceutical research. Geography and Strategy, 2003, vol. 20, pp. 49–87.
8. Janne O.E.M. The emergence of corporate integrated innovation systems across regions: The case of the chemical and pharmaceutical industry. J. Int. Manag., 2002, no. 8, pp. 97–119.
9. Kaiser R. Multi-level science policy and regional innovation: The case of the Munich cluster for pharmaceutical biotechnology. Eur. Plan. Stud., 2003, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 841–857.
10. Krotrov A.I. Regional strategies of multinational corporations in emerging pharmaceutical markets. Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2013. 166 p.
11. Li S., Angelino A., Yin H., Spigarelli F. Determinants of FDI localization in China: A county-level analysis for the pharmaceutical industry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2017, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 1–20.
12. Mammed’arov Z.A. Innovative development of the global pharmaceutical industry. Cand. Sci. (Econ.) Dissertation. Moscow: IMEMO RAS, 2018. 182 p.
13. Ovcharov E.G. Global pharmaceutical industry: current state and development trends in the context of globalization. Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Econ.) Dissertation. Moscow: RUDN Univ., 2005. 28 p.
14. Podgornev P.V. Territorial structure of the pharmaceutical industry in the post-industrial era. Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2015. 190 p.
15. Rodionova I.A., Ovcharov E.G. Pharmaceutical industry of Russian Federation. Vestn. RUDN, Ser. Ekon., 2001, no. 1, pp. 70–79.
16. Van Egeraat C., Curran D. Spatial concentration in the Irish pharmaceutical industry: The role of spatial planning and agglomeration economies. Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 2013, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 338–358.
17. Yeoh P.-L. Location choice and the internationalization sequence: Insights from Indian pharmaceutical companies. Int. Mark. Rev., 2011, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 291–312.
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsova O.V., Bobrovskiy R.O. Factors of Pharmaceutical Enterprises Localization—the Case of the Largest Pharmaceutical Companies in Russia. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2022;86(2):168-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556622020066