Spatial Structure of Tourism in the Context of the “Center–Periphery” Concept: The Case of Tyumen Oblast
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556623010077
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the spatial structure of the tourist economy in the Tyumen region. The theoretical and methodological basis of this analysis is the concept of “center–periphery.” The study uses the method of cluster analysis (using the rules of single and full connection, weighted pairwise average, weighted centroid methods and the Ward method) to isolate groups of municipalities with a similar set of variables reflecting the infrastructure security and cultural and historical potential of the territory, which guarantees an adequate segmentation of the tourist space of the region into a regional center that consolidates record tourist resources and the most diverse types of tourist activity; the second centers are fixed by increased indicators of tourist potential with clearly distinguished branches of specialization. Peripheral areas are extremely poorly equipped with infrastructure components, characterized by internal heterogeneity of tourist manifestations with single destinations and transport isolation, while tourism for them is a means of overcoming economic backwardness, but is located in the zone of risky entrepreneurship. The results of the study allow us to improve the scientific and practical content of tourist zoning and territorial planning of the tourist industry of the Tyumen region.
Keywords
About the Authors
M. V. GudkovskikhRussian Federation
Tyumen
D. A. Dirin
Russian Federation
Tyumen
References
1. Alexandrova A.Yu. Structural-functional analysis of the world touristic space. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2009, no. 4, pp. 21–26. (In Russ.).
2. Ashugatoyan S.G. Transformation of the spatial structure of internal tourism in Turkey. Geogr. Bull., 2017, no. 4 (43), pp. 153–161. (In Russ.).
3. Aubert A.A, Csapo J.B, Pirkhoffer, E.C, Puczko L., SzaboG.D. A method for complex spatial delimitation of tourism destinations in South Transdanubia. Hungarian Geogr. Bull., 2010, vol. 59, no. 3, pp.271–287.
4. Friedman J. Regional development policy. Boston: Mass. Inst. Techn., 1966. 279 p.
5. Ghimire K.B. Regional tourism and South-South economic cooperation. Geogr. J., 2001, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 99–110.
6. Gormsen E. The impact of tourism on coastal areas. Geogr. J., 1997, no. 42, pp. 39–54.
7. Gritsai O.V., Ioffe G.V., Treivish A.I. Tsentr i periferiya v regional’nom razvitii [Center and Periphery in Regional Development]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1991. 168 p.
8. Gudkovskikh M.V. Methodology for comprehensive assessment of tourism potential. Geogr. Bull., 2017, no. 1(40), pp. 102–116. https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2017-1-102-116 (In Russ.).
9. Holmgren H.A., Lindkvist K.B. Resource management regimes and innovation in peripheral nature-based tourism: The case of North Cape tourism and sea-fishing tourism. Norsk Geogr. Tidsskrift, 2016, vol. 70, no.4, pp. 203–215.
10. Kaganskii V.L. Center – province – periphery – border. The main zones of the cultural landscape. In Kul’turnii landshaft: voprosy teorii i metodologii issledovanii. Seminar “Kul’turnyi landshaft”. Vtoroi temat. vyp. dokl. sem. [Cultural Landscape: Issues of Theory and Methodology of Research: Seminar “Cultural Landscape”: The Second Thematic Issue of the Seminar Reports]. Krasovskaya T.M., Ed. Moscow–Smolensk: SGU Publ., 1998, pp. 72–101.
11. Keller C.P. Centre-periphery tourism development and control. Leisure, tourism and social change. Conf. Pap. Edinburgh, 1983, pp. 77–84.
12. Kruzhalin V.I., Kruzhalin K.V. Spatial organization of recreation and tourism in the regions of Russia. Turism i rekreatsiya: fundamental’nye i priklandye issledovaniya: Tr. V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi conf.MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, geograficheskii fakultet [Tourism and Recreation: Fundamental and Applied Research: Proc. of the V Int. Scientific and Practical Conf. Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography. Moscow, 28–29 April 2010]. St. Petersburg: D.A.R.K. Publ., 2010, pp. 19–29.
13. Krystev V.K. Geo-economic polarization of the world tourist space in the central-peripheral order. In Sotsial’nopoliticheskie i ekologo-khozyaistvennye problemy razvitiya Baltiiskogo regiona: K 170-letiyu Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konf. [Socio-political, Ecological and Economic Problems of the Baltic Region Development. To the 170th Anniversary of the Russian Geographical Society: Materials of the Int. Sci. Scientific and Practical Conf. Pskov, 19–20 November 2015]. Pskov: Pskov State University Publ., 2015, pp. 3–10.
14. Manakov A.G. Geography of international tourism and UNESCO World Heritage: a look through the prism of the “center-periphery” concept. Pskov. Reg. Zh., 2009, no. 8, pp. 63–74. (In Russ.).
15. Manyane R.M. Rethinking trans-boundary tourism resources at the Botswana-North West Province border.South African Geogr. J., 2017, vol. 99, no. 2, pp.134–151.
16. Mowforth M., Munt I. Tourism and sustainability: Development, globalisation and new tourism in the Third World. London: Routledge, 2015. 476 p.
17. Penzes J. The dimensions of peripheral areas and their restructuring in Central Europe. Hungarian Geogr. Bull., 2013, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 373–386.
18. Rezzani R.J. Classification analysis of world economicregions. Geogr. Analysis, 2001, vol. 33, no. 4, рр.330–352.
19. Taylor P.J., Catalano G., Walker D.R.F. Exploratory analysis of the world city network. Urban Stud., 2002, vol.39, no. 13, pp. 2377–2394.
20. Wallerstein I.M. Analiz mirovykh system i situatsiya v sovremennom mire [World-Systems Analysis and the Situation in the Modern World]. Kagarlitskii B.Yu, Ed. St.Petersburg: Univ. kniga Publ., 2001. 414 p.
21. Wu X., Ben Sui, Daniel Z. An initial exploration of a lacunarity-based segregation measure. Envir. Plan., 2001, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 433–446.
22. Zimmermann G.R. Madagascar: Economic and ecologicalinterdependencies illustrated along a centreperiphery profile. Geogr. Rundschau, 2005, vol. 57, no.4, pp. 42–49.
23. Zyryanov A.I. Theory and methodology of recreational geography. Perm State National Research University Publ., 2021, 19, 368 p. http://www.psu.ru/files/docs/science/books/uchebnie-posobiya/zyryanov-teoriya-i-metodologiya-rekreacionnoj-geografii.pdf (accessed: 27.05.2021). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Gudkovskikh M.V., Dirin D.A. Spatial Structure of Tourism in the Context of the “Center–Periphery” Concept: The Case of Tyumen Oblast. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2023;87(1):147-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556623010077