General Basis of Conception of Sustainable Development and Ecosystem Surveys
https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2012-3-22-39
Abstract
General basis of realization of conception of sustainable development and ecosystem surveys are discussed in the article. It is shown, that both conceptions are refl ected on general theoretic-methodological basis – notions on natural capital, use in “green economy” notions of entropy and information, inclusion of well-being function to the sustainable development and implementation of methods of economic calculation with use of monitoring system of measuring. Based on approaches to evaluation of ecosystem surveys, developed by R. Constance with so-authors (1992) and calculations of potential cost according to industrial function of Coba-Duglas their qualitative expression can be received via gross national product. Unfortunately, integrated in monetary expression streams from natural capital and streams of economic system are few informative for management. Possibility of realization of sustainable development mainly depends from operative reception of independent information on condition and streams of natural capital.
References
1. Азгальдов Г.Г. Теория и практика оценки качества товаров (основы квалиметрии). М.: Экономика. 1982. 256 с.
2. Вальтух К.К. Информационная теория стоимости и законы неравновесной экономики. Изд-во Янус-К, 2001 г. 896 стр.
3. Вальтух К.К. 2005 Теория стоимости, статистическая верификация, информационное обобщение, актуальные выводы // Вестн. РАН. 2005. Т. 75. № 9. С. 793–817.
4. Доклад концептуальной рабочей группы по “Оценке экосистем на пороге тысячелетия”. World Resources Institute, Island Press. 2005. 268 c.
5. Колемаев В.А. Математическая экономика. М.: ЮНИТИ-ДАНА, 2002. 390 c.
6. Медоуз Д. Пределы роста 30 лет спустя. Академкнига, 2007. С. 342.
7. Нижегородцев Р.М. Информационная экономика. Книга 2. Управление беспорядком: Экономические основы производства и обращения информации. Москва–Кострома, 2002. 173 с.
8. Пузаченко Ю.Г. Соотношение между структурой и продуктивностью в биогеоценотических системах // Биологические системы в земледелии и лесоводстве. М., 1974. С. 62–69.
9. Пузаченко Ю.Г. 1987. Обоснование экологической ценности территории. Методы изучения расселения. М.: ИГ АН СССР. С. 154–164.
10. Пузаченко Ю.Г. Биологическое разнообразие, устойчивость и функционирование // Проблемы устойчивости биологических систем. М.: ИЭМЭЖ АН СССР, 1982. С. 5–32.
11. Пузаченко Ю.Г. Семантические аспекты информатики // Экоинформатика. СПб.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1992. С. 3–274.
12. Пузаченко Ю.Г. 2006. Глобальное биологическое разнообразие и его пространственно-временная изменчивость // Современные глобальные изменения природной среды. Т. 2. М.: Научный мир, 2006. С. 306–377.
13. Пузаченко Ю.Г. Биологическое разнообразие в биосфере: системологический и семантический анализ // Междисциплин. науч. и приклад. Журн. “Биосфера”. 2009. Т. 1. № 1. С. 25–38.
14. Свирежев Ю.М., Логофет Д.О. Устойчивость биологических сообществ. М.: Изд-во Наука, 1978. 352 с.
15. Стратонович Р.Л. Теория информации. М.: Сов. Радио, 1975. 424 с.
16. Хазен А.М. Разум природы и разум человека. М.: РИО “Мособлполиграфиздата” НТЦ Университетский, 2000. 760 c.
17. Эшби У.Р. Введение в кибернетику. М.: Иностранная литература, 1959. 432 c.
18. ЮНЕП: Навстречу “зеленой” экономике: пути к устойчивому развитию и искоренению бедности – обобщающий доклад для представителей властных структур. www.unep.org/greeneconomy.
19. Balk D., Yetman G. The Global Distribution of Population: Evaluating the gains in resolution refi nement. 2004. P. 1–15. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/gpw/documentation.jsp
20. Bateman I.J., Mace G.M., Fezzi C., Atkinson G. et al. Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments Environ Resource Econ Springer Science+Business Media. V. B. 2010. P. 1–42.
21. Carson R.T., Granger Cl.W.J., Jackson J.B. Wolfram Schlenker. Fisheries Management Under Cyclical Population Dynamics // Environ Resource Econ. № 42. 2009. Р. 379–410.
22. Costanza R. Thinking Broadly About Costs and Benefi ts in Ecological Management Integr Environ. Assess. Manag. Х. 2006.
23. Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R., Farber St. et al.The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital // Nature. 1987. V. 387. P. 253–260.
24. Costanza R., Daly H.E. Toward an Ecological economics. Ecological Modelling, 38. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam – Printed in The Netherlands, 1987. P. 1–7.
25. Costanza R., Daly H.E. Natural Capital and Sustainable Development // Conservation Biology. 1992. V. 6. № 1. Р. 37–46.
26. Costanza R., Daly H.E., Bartholomew J.A. Goals, Agenda and Police recommendations for ecological economics. Ecological Economics. www.uvm.edu/giee/publications/Costanza, Daly, Barth 1991.
27. Costanza R., Daly H.E., Childers L., Erickson J. et al. Valuing New Jersey’s Natural Capital: An Assessment of the Economic Value of the State’s Natural Resources. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/dsr/naturalcap/2007.
28. Costanza R., Hart M., Posner St., Talberth J. Beyond GDP. The Need for New Measures of Progress // The PARDEE PAPERS. 2009. № 4.
29. Daly H.E. Forum Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow // Stiglitz Ecological economics. 1997. № 22. Р. 261–266.
30. Dehaene S. The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law:a logarithmic mental number line // TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 2003. V. 7. № 4. Р. 146–147.
31. Farber S., Costanza R., Childers D.L., Erickson J. at. ol. Linking Ecology and Economics for Ecosystem Management // BioScience. 2006. V. 56. № 2.
32. Felipe J., Adams F.G. “A theory of Production” the estimation of the Cobb-Douglas function: A retrospective view // J. Eastern Economic. 2005. V. 31. № 3.
33. Frey B.S., Stutzer Al. Economics and Psychology: Developments and Issues. England MIT Press, 2007. 296 p.
34. Georgescu-Roegen N. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. 1971.
35. Georgescu-Roegen N. Energy and economic myths // J. South. Econ. 1975. Р. 347–381.
36. Georgescu-Roegen N. The entropy Law and the Economic Process in Retrospect // J. Eastern Economic. 1986. V. 12. № 1. Р. 3–29.
37. Grubler A. The Rise and Fall of Infrastructures Dynamics of Evolution and Technological Change in Transport. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, 1990. 305 p.
38. Hammond G.P., Winnett A.B. The Influence of Thermodynamic Ideas on Ecological Economics // An Interdisciplinary Critique Sustainability. 2009. № 7. Р. 1195–1225.
39. Hawken P., Lovins A., Hunter L. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution By. Little, Brown and Company, 1999.
40. Huppert F., Linley P. Al. / Еd Happiness and Wellbeing. Critical concepts in psychology Routledge, 2010. 1600 p.
41. The International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project, Initiative II (ISLSCP II) http://daac.ornl.gov/ISLSCP_II/islscpii.shtml
42. Jarne G., Sanchez-Cholz J., Fatas-Villafranea F. “S-shaped” Economic Dynamics. The Logistic and Gompets curves generalizes // J. Elect. Evol. Modeling and Econom. Denamics. 2005. № 1048.
43. Kováč L. Information and Knowledge in Biology. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2007. V. 2. № 2.
44. Kucharavy D., De Guio R. Application of S-shaped curves. “TRIZ-Future Conference 2007: Current Scientific and Industrial Reality, Frankfurt: Germany Jürgen E. Blank. Environmental Economics www.wiwi.unikl.de/dekanat/blank/envecon.
45. Masin S.C., Zudini V., Antonelli M. Early Alternative derivations of Fechner’s Law // J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 2009. № 45. Р. 56–65.
46. McAfee R.P., Johnson J.St. Introduction to Economic Analysis. http://www.introecon.com, 2006. July 24.
47. Michalos Alex C.(ed). Happiness and Wellbeing Is happiness measurable and what do those measures mean for public policy?’, at Rome, 2–3 April 2007. University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’. 1–25.
48. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well_being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. Island Press. 2005. 267 р.
49. Neva R.G., Cleveland C. 2006. “Capital”. In: Encyclopedia of Earth. Eds. Cutler J. Cleveland
50. (Washington, D.C.: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment). [First published in the Encyclopedia of Earth November 6, 2006; Last revised Date November 6, 2006; Retrieved April 21, 2011 <http://www.eoearth.org/article/Capital>
51. Pan H., Köhler J. Technological change in energy systems: Learning curves, logistic curves and input–output coeffi cients // Ecological economics. 2007. Р. 749–758.
52. Rigoberto J., Daza P. The utility function and the emotional well-being function EJBO // Electr. J. Business Ethics and Organ. Stud. 2004. V. 9. № 2. Р. 23–29.
53. Richmond Amy, Robert K. Kaufmann, Ranga B. Myneni Valuing ecosystem services: A shadow price for net primary production // ECOLOGICALECONOMICS. 2007. № 64. Р. 454–462.
54. Barkley R.J. Post Keynesian perspectives and complex ecologic-economic dynamics. cob.jmu.edu/rosserjb/POST%20KEYNESIAN%20PERSPECTIVES %20AND%20COMPLEX%20ECOLOGIC.doc. 2010.
55. Ruth М. Information, order and knowledge in economic and ecological systems: implications for material and energy use // Ecological Economics. 1995. № 13. Р. 99–114.
56. Seijo J.C., Defeo O., Salas S. Fisheries bioeconomics. Theory, modelling and management // FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. 1998. № 368. Rome, FAO. 108 p.
57. Shannon CL.E. Communication in the Presence of Noise // PROCEEDINGS OF THE IRE. 1949. V. 37. № 1. Р. 10–21.
58. Thurstone L.L. Psychophysical Analysis // American J. Psych. 1927. V. 38. № 3. Р. 368–389.
59. Vic Li, Lang Gr. China’s “Green GDP” Experiment and the Struggle for Ecological Modernisation // J. Contemporary Asia 2010. V. 40. № 1. Р. 44–62.
60. World Database of Happiness. http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/trendnat/framepage.htm
61. Wren-Lewis S. Towards a Complete Account of Psychological Happiness // Praxis. 2010. V. 2. № 2. P. 58–81.
Review
For citations:
Puzachenko Yu.G. General Basis of Conception of Sustainable Development and Ecosystem Surveys. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2012;(3):22-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2012-3-22-39
Views:
1234
Email this article 
