Approaches to Implementing Ecosystem Climate Projects in Russia

Russia is developing a legal framework for the Paris Agreement implementation. In Russian strategic documents, there is no consistency in measures and quantitative indicators to reduce emissions and increase absorption of greenhouse gases. The main focus on forests and other ecosystems through the implementation of climate change mitigation projects also raises questions. The purpose of this paper is to determine the goal and place of these projects within the framework of a national low-carbon policy, and to analyze the opportunities and limitations of such projects in Russia. The main criteria are the additionality, conservative baselines, and minimization of risks (leakage, non-permanence, cessation of project funding, reversion). Ecosystem projects are high-risk compared to industrial projects, while the climate component of project activities occurs only in the long-term preservation of the result. The project’s goal in Russia to refine mitigation technologies based on sustainable management of natural ecosystems: the results lead to the multiple benefits including ecosystem services of the territory, biodiversity and adaptation to climate change. Therefore, their attractiveness in the implementation of sustainable development policies of companies and the state is growing. Given the additional nature, projects will not be able to provide a significant quantitative contribution to mitigation, but can provide a tool to achieve that. At the initial stage of the Russian carbon market it is necessary to allow only reliable and transparent projects (reforestation and afforestation with mixed species; improved forest management of managed forests; management of previously unmanaged forests; restoration of wetlands/grassland ecosystems; conservation of soil carbon of agricultural lands; biochar inputs to soils). Projects such as forest conservation from logging and monoculture plantations require a separate regulatory framework to prevent tampering and minimize threats to local natural ecosystems.

1. Belyaev V.I., Varlagin A.V., Dridiger V.K., Kurganova I.N., Orlova L.V., Orlov S.V., Popov A.I., Romanovskaya A.A., Toigil’din A.L., Trots N.M., Fomin A.A., Homyakov D.M. The global climate agenda. Soil conservation (carbon) farming as a standard of cross-national and national strategies for soil conservation and agrarian carbon markets. Int. Agri. J., 2022, vol. 65, no. 1. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740-2022-6-1-26

2. Da Cunha T.Q.G., Santos A.C., Novaes E., Hansted A.L.S., Yamaji F.M., Sette Jr C.R. Eucalyptus expansion in Brazil: Energy yield in new forest frontiers. Biomass Bioenergy, 2021, vol. 144, p. 105900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105900

3. De Barros Ferraz S.F., Rodrigues C.B., Garcia L.G., Alvares C.A., de Paula Lima W. Effects of Eucalyptus plantations on streamflow in Brazil: Moving beyond the water use debate. For. Ecol. Manag., 2019, vol. 453, p. 117571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117571

4. Fomenko G.A., Romanovskaya A.A., Fomenko M.A., Loshadkin K.A., Klimov E.V., Lipka O.N., Korotkov V.N., Aldoshina A.S. Forest climate projects: opportunities and challenges of implementing the ESG approach. Part 1. Prob. Reg. Ecol., 2022a, no. 2, pp. 91–106. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/1024412/1728-323H-2022-2-91-106

5. Fomenko G.A., Romanovskaya A.A., Fomenko M.A., Loshadkin K.A., Klimov E.V., Lipka O.N., Korotkov V.N., Aldoshina A.S. Forest climate projects: opportunities and challenges of implementing the ESG approach. Part 2. Prob. Reg. Ecol, 2022b, no. 3, pp. 65–74. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/1024412/1728-323H-2022-3-65-74

6. Griscom B.W., Lomax G., Kroeger T., Ellis P.W. We need both natural and energy solutions to stabilize our climate. Glob. Chang. Biol., 2019, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1889–1890. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14612

7. Guo M. The 3R principles for applying biochar to improve soil health. Soil Syst., 2020, vol. 4, no. 1, 9 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4010009

8. IPCC, 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above preindustrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pörtner H.-O., Roberts D., Skea J., Shukla P.R., Pirani A., Moufouma-Okia W., Péan C., Pidcock R., Connors S., Matthews J.B.R., Chen Y., Zhou X., Gomis M.I., Lonnoy E., Maycock T., Tignor M., Waterfield T., Eds. UK; NY, USA: CUP, 2018. 562 p.

9. IPCC, 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Pörtner H.-O., Roberts D.C., Tignor M., Poloczanska E.S., Mintenbeck K., Alegría A., Craig M., Langsdorf S., Löschke S., Möller V., Okem A., Rama B., Eds. UK; NY, USA: CUP, 2002a. 3056 p.

10. IPCC, 2022. Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Shukla P.R., Skea J., Slade R., Al Khourdajie A., van Diemen R., McCollum D., Pathak M., Some S., Vyas P., Fradera R., Belkacemi M., Hasija A., Lisboa G., Luz S., Malley J., Eds. UK; NY, USA: CUP, 2022b.

11. Lesa Rossii i izmeneniya klimata. Chto nam mozhet skazat’ nauka [Russia’s Forests and Climate Change. What Science Can Tell Us]. Leskinen P., Lindner M., Verkerk P.J., Nabuurs G.Ya., van Brusselen J., Kulikova E., Hassegava M., Lerink B., Eds. Joensuu: European forest institute, 2020. 136 p.

12. Li X.-W., Miao H.-Z. How to Incorporate Blue Carbon into the China Certified Emission Reductions Scheme: Legal and Policy Perspectives. Sustain., 2022, vol. 14, p. 10567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710567

13. Matveev S.M., Vodolazhskii A.N., Mironenko A.V. Approaches and Suggestions for Determining and Implementing the Estimated Timber Cut in the Russian Federation. Lesotekh. Zh., 2019, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 68–86. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2019.3/7

14. MGEIK Rukovodyashchie printsipy natsional’nykh inventarizatsii parnikovykh gazov. Programma natsional’nykh inventarizatsii parnikovykh gazov MGEIK [IPCC, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Program]. Igleston H.S., Buendia L., Miva K., Ngara T., Tanabe K., Eds. Japan: IGES, 2006.

15. Natsional’nyi doklad “Global’nyi klimat i pochvennyi pokrov Rossii: opustynivanie i degradatsiya zemel’, institutsional’nye, infrastrukturnye, tekhnologicheskie mery adaptatsii (sel’skoe i lesnoe khozyaistvo)”. Tom 2 [National Report “Global Climate and Soil Cover of Russia: Desertification and Land Degradation, Institutional, Infrastructural, Technological Adaptation Measures (Agriculture and Forestry)”. Vol. 2]. Edelgeriev R.S.-H., Ed. Moscow: MBA Publ., 2019. 476 p.

16. Natsional’nyi doklad o kadastre antropogennykh vybrosov iz istochnikov i absorbtsii poglotitelyami parnikovykh gazov, ne reguliruemykh Monreal’skim protokolom, za 1990– 2020 gg. Tom 1 [National Report on the Inventory of Anthropogenic Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks of Greenhouse Gases not Controlled by the Montreal Protocol for 1990–2020. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Rosgidromet Publ., 2022. 468 p.

17. Romanovskaya A.A., Korotkov V.N., Polumieva P.D., Trunov A.A., Vertyankina V.Yu., Karaban R.T. Greenhouse gas fluxes and mitigation potential for managed lands in the Russian Federation. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang., 2020, no. 5, pp. 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09885-2

18. Shvarts E.A., Ptichnikov A.V. Russia’s low-carbon development strategy and the role of forests in its implementation. Nauch. Tr. VEO Rossii, 2022, vol. 236, no. 4, pp. 399–426. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2022-236-4-399- 426

19. Vaganov E.A., Porfir’ev B.N., Shirov A.A., Kolpakov A.Yu., Pyzhev A.I. Assessment of the contribution of Russian forests to climate change mitigation. Ekonom. Reg., 2021, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1096–1109. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-4