Production Dependence on Imports in the Russian Economy: Regional Projection

The key factors in the regional consequences of the sanctions imposed in 2022 on certain sectors of the Russian economy were disruption of supply chains and production ties with foreign companies. The significance of these factors for the regional economy can be assessed through the indicator of production dependence on imports. The study revealed that low production dependence on imports is typical for the least developed regions that are poorly integrated into the international trade system, as well as individual regions specializing in the extraction of fuel and energy minerals, for which imports are more important than mass supplies of equipment and components. A high level of dependence is manifested in three types of regions: those specializing in machinery industry, entities on whose territory international ports are located, as well as territories where large investment projects are being implemented with the participation of foreign capital and/or with significant purchases of foreign equipment. Although in 2020–2021, production dependence on imports had practically no effect on the overall dynamics of the industry. In 2022 this factor again became significant and led to a deterioration in the situation in the group of regions with the maximum level of production dependence on imports. The strengthening of the negative impact of production dependence on imports, among other things, was the result of the policy of import substitution carried out in Russia over the past decade, aimed at directly replacing the supply of imported goods to the Russian market, primarily through the localization of the final stages of production. At the same time, the absence of a stimulating policy to increase competitiveness in export sectors through the development of own technologies and the production of technological equipment can lead to technological blocking and a long-term industrial crisis in regions with medium and low production dependence on imports.

1. Amsden A.H. Escape from Empire: The developing World’s Journey through Heaven and Hell. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2007. 209 p.

2. Animitsa Ye.G., Animitsa P.Ye., Glumov A.A. Import substitution in regional industrial production: Theoretical and practical aspects. Ekon. Reg., 2015, no. 3, pp. 160– 172. (In Russ.).

3. Berezinskaya O., Vedev A. Dependency of the Russian industry on imports and the strategy of import substitution industrialization. Vopr. Ekon., 2015, no. 1, pp. 103–115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-1-103-115

4. Drapkin I.M., Mariev O.S., Chukavina K.V. Inflow and outflow potentials of foreign direct investment in the Russian economy: Numerical estimation based on the Gravity approach. Zh. Novoi Ekon. Assots., 2015, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 75–95. (In Russ.).

5. Fal’tsman V.K. Forcing import substitution in the new geopolitical situation. Probl. Prognozir., 2015, no. 1, pp. 22–32. (In Russ.).

6. Fedorova E., Barikhina Y. Assessing horizontal and vertical spillover effects from foreign direct investment in Russia. Vopr. Ekon., 2015а, no. 3, pp. 46–60. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-3-46-60

7. Fedorova E., Lavrov K., Nikolaev A. Foreign direct investment and the problem of sanctions. Obshch. Ekon., 2015b, no. 7, pp. 45–57. (In Russ.).

8. Galkina L.A., Sharipov A.I. Algorithm for choosing priorities in the formation of a portfolio of import substitution projects. Ekon. Vchera Segod. Zavt., 2015, no. 6, pp. 204–218. (In Russ.).

9. Kaukin A.S., Miller E.M. Dynamics of industrial production in the second quarter of 2022. Ekon. Razvit. Ross., vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 24–28. (In Russ.).

10. Kirillov V.N. Import substitution in Latin America – positive and negative experience. Vestn. GUU, 2014, no. 17, pp. 137–142. (In Russ.).

11. Knobel’ A.Yu., Firanchuk A.S. Foreign trade in 2021: export growth due to a jump in prices. Ekon. Razvit. Ross., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 10–14. (In Russ.).

12. Kuznetsov A.V. Foreign direct investment: “neighborhood effect”. Mir. Ekon. Mezhdun. Otnosh., 2008, no. 9, pp. 40–46. (In Russ.).

13. Kuznetsov B.V., Simachev Yu.V. Evolution of state industrial policy in Russia. Zh. Novoi Ekon. Assots., 2014, no. 2, pp. 152–178. (In Russ.).

14. Kuznetsova O.V. Direct foreign investment in Russian regions amid sanctions. Mezhdun. Prots., 2016a, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 132–142. (In Russ.).

15. Kuznetsova O.V. The role of foreign capital in the Economy of Russian regions: assessment opportunities and interregional differences. Probl. Prognozir., 2016b. vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 59–70. (In Russ.).

16. Malkina M.Yu. Impact of foreign direct investment on the Russian regions disparitites in the level of production and dynamics of interregional inequality. Prostran. Ekon., 2017, no. 4, pp. 59–80. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2017.4.059-080

17. Manturov D.V., Nikitin G.S., Os’makov V.S. State regulation of Russian industry in the 2010s. Vopr. Gos. Munits. Upravl., 2017, no. 1, pp. 50–70. (In Russ.).

18. Mogilat A. FDI inflows into Russian real sector: Microeconomic foundations and forecasting. Vopr. Ekon., 2015, no. 6, pp. 25–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-6-25-44

19. Prebisch R. The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. In Economic Commission for Latin America. Lake Success, NY: UN Department of Economic Affairs, 1950. 66 p.

20. Abashkin V.L., Kutsenko E.S., Tyurchev K.S. Rating of Russian regions by import dependence of their specializations. Ekspress-vyp. NIU VShE, 2023. Available at: https://issek.hse.ru/news/821904285.html (accessed: 23.03.2023). (In Russ.).

21. Rodriguez-Clare A. Multinationals, linkages, and economic development. Am. Econ. Rev., 1996, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 852–873.

22. Rychkova Ya.V., Sokol’nikova O.B. Import substitution in the Russian Federation: retrospective analysis, current state, indicators. Ross. Ekon. Internet-Zh., 2018, no. 2, pp. 84–100. (In Russ.).

23. Shamkhalov F.I. Experience of import substitution of defense industry products in foreign countries. Izv. Tul’sk. Gos. Univ. Ekon. Yurid. Nauki, 2009, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 15–29. (In Russ.).

24. Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M.G., Zudin N.N. Import dependence and import substitution in the Russian manufacturing industry: a business view. Forsait, 2016, no. 4, pp. 25–45. (In Russ.).

25. Simachev Yu.V., Fedyunina A.A., Gorodny N.A. Global advanced manufacturing markets – a new opportunity for Russia’s technological upgrade. Zh. Novoi Ekon. Assots., 2022, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 202–212. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-10

26. Skvortsov A.O., Skvortsova V.A. Import substitution: experience of other countries and challenges for Russia. Izv. Vyssh. Ucheb. Zaved. Povolzh. Reg. Ekon. Nauki, 2015, no. 1, pp. 97–104. (In Russ.).

27. Strizhkova L.A. Using “input-output” tables in estimating the dependence of Russian economy on import and import substitution processes. Vopr. Statist., 2016, no. 5, pp. 3–22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2016-0-5-3-22

28. Vasil’eva L.V. Foreign experience of import substitution: trends of state regulation. Ross. Tendents. Perspekt. Razvit., 2016, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 237–241. (In Russ.).

29. Vatolkina N.Sh., Gorbunova N.V. Import substitution: foreign experience, tools and effects. π-Economy, 2015, vol. 233, no. 6, pp. 29–39. (In Russ.).

30. V’etnamskaya ekonomika: 20 let obnovleniya (1986–2006 gg.). Dostizheniya i postavlennye problemy [The Vietnamese Economy: 20 Years of Renewal (1986–2006). Achievements and Challenges]. Hanoi, 2014. 279 p.

31. Zemlyanskii D.Yu., Kalinovskii L.V., Medvednikova D.M., Chuzhenkova V.A. Risk assessment of foreign companies’ withdrawal for the economy and labor markets of Russian regions. Ekon. Razvit. Ross., 2022, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 4–14. (In Russ.).

32. Zubarevich N. Regional dimension of the new Russian crisis. Vopr. Ekon., 2015, no. 4, pp. 37–52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2015-4-37-52