Are “Bear Corners” Homogeneous: Differentiation of Regions Along the Vologda–Kostroma Border

The article considers a strip of municipal districts on the border of Kostroma and Vologda oblasts–a territory that simultaneously belongs to the periphery of both regions, the periphery of economic regions and modern federal districts, and the inner periphery of European Russia. The territories under consideration are part of the old-developed non-Chernozem zone, which is characterized by rapid depopulation and shrinkage of the developed space. The purpose of the study is to identify the spatial differentiation of areas along the border and its role in the formation of differences between the territories. Various methods were used: the study of historical maps, the analysis of modern statistics, methods of qualitative sociology, and field observations. The study showed the predominantly barrier function of the regional border, largely due to physical and geographical reasons–the watershed of the Volga and White Sea basins and the configuration of rivers along which local systems historically formed rural settlement pattern and transport corridors. The historical multidirectional spatial gravity of regions on different sides of the border, combined with institutional barriers, led to the differentiation of economic and social processes in municipal regions. Thus, the socioeconomic indicators of the regions on the Vologda side of the border are generally more prosperous and differ less from each other than on the Kostroma side. The study also revealed an extremely important role that interregional routes could play. With a general trend towards a reduction in the rural population and fragmentation of the local economy, the territories on both sides of the border are heterogeneous, and various combinations of place functions are formed. At the same time, it is premature to attribute a strip of peripheral territory in relation to many centers to the zone of a spontaneously formed natural reserve.

1. Averkieva K.V. Intra-rural migration of the population and local processes of transformation of rural areas in the forest zone of the old-developed Non-Chernozem regions. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2021, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 828–841. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556621060066

2. Averkieva K.V. Post-Soviet transformation of forest settlements in the north of the Non-Chernozem region. Krest’yanoved., 2021, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 90–110. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2021-6-3-90-110

3. Baransky N.N. Ekonomicheskaya geografiya SSSR: obzor po oblastyam Gosplana [Economic Geography of the USSR: an Overview of the Areas of the State Planning Committee]. Moscow; Leningrad, 1927. 336 p.

4. Beick B., Lang T. Re-thinking non-core regions: Planning strategies and practices beyond growth. Eur. Plan. Stud., 2017, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1363398

5. Geograficheskie granitsy [Geographical Boundaries]. Rodoman B.B., Ekkel B.M., Eds. Moscow: Mosk. Univ. Publ., 1982.

6. Kagansky V.L. Inner periphery – a new growing zone of the cultural landscape of Russia. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2012, no. 6, pp. 23–34. (In Russ.).

7. Kagansky V.L. Limological studies (the results of the author’s research in general and geographical limology for 40 years). Reg. Issled., 2022, no. 3, pp. 5–22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2022-3-1

8. Kalutskov V.N. Russian North: regional cultural landscape and its age-old cycles. Izv. RGO, 2005, no. 5, pp. 43–57. (In Russ.).

9. Kaplin V.N. Gosudareva doroga [The Sovereign’s Road]. Available at: https://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/К/kaplinvadim-nikolaevich/gosudareva-doroga/15 (accessed: 04.08.2023). (In Russ.).

10. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V. The role of migration in enhancing settlement pattern contrasts at the municipal level in Russia. Reg. Res. Russ., 2016, no. 6, pp. 332– 343. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970516040080

11. Kolosov V.A. Border Studies: Development of the Theory and Major Trends in a Changing Geopolitical Environment. Reg. Res. Russ., 2023, no. 4, pp. 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700946

12. Kühn M. Peripheralization: Theoretical concepts explaining socio-spatial inequalities. Eur. Plan. Stud., 2013, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 367–378.

13. Kuz’minov I.F. Socio-economic challenges to the timber industry in the North-European part of Russia (case study of Kostroma oblast). Reg. Res. Russ., 2011, no. 1, pp. 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970511010096

14. Nefedova T.G. Polarization of socio-economic space and prospects of rural areas in the old-developed regions of the Center of Russia. Krest’yanoved., 2021, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 126–153. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/2500-1809-2021-6-1-126-153

15. Nefedova, T.G., Treivish A.I., Sheludkov A.V. Spatially Uneven Development in Russia. Reg. Res. Russ., 2022, no. 12, pp. 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020071

16. Oikumena blizhnego Severa Rossii: kollektivnaya monografiya [The Ecumene of the Near North of Russia: A Collective Monograph]. Pokrovsky N.E., Nefedova T.G., Eds. Moscow: Univ. Kniga Publ., 2016. 264 p.

17. Pshenitsyn D.A. Soligalichskii torgovyi trakt, ili istoriya volosti Tolshma (XVII–XX vv.): Tolshmenskoe sel’skoe poselenie, Totemskii raion Vologodskoi oblasti [Soligalichsky Trade Tract, or the History of Tolshma Parish (XVII–XX Centuries): Tolshmenskoye Rural Settlement, Totemsky District of the Vologda Region]. Arkhangelsk: Lotsia Publ., 2019. 575 p.

18. Rodoman B.B. Ecological potential of administrative borders. Reg. Issled., 2022, no. 3, pp. 54–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2022-3-5

19. Severo-Zapad SSSR. Ekonomiko-geograficheskaya kharakteristika [North-West of the RSFSR. Economic and Geographical Characteristics]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1964. 652 p.

20. Shuvalov V.E. Functions of Borders and Delimitation of the Basic Concepts of Theoretical Limology. Reg. Res. Russ., 2023, no. 4, pp. 646–651. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523701034

21. Soldatova N.V. Dinamika rasseleniya Vologodskoi oblasti vo vtoroi polovine XX–nachale XXI veka [Dynamics of Settlement of the Vologda Oblast in the Second Half of the 20th – Beginning of the 21th Century]. Vologda: VSPU Publ., 2010. 166 p.

22. Staroosvoennye raiony v prostranstve Rossii: istoria i sovremennost’ [Old-developed Areas in the Space of Russia: History and Modernity]. Nefedova T.G., Starikova A.V., Eds. Moscow: KMK Publ., 2021. 379 p.

23. Tarkhov S.A. Administrative-territorial division of Russia XVIII–XX centuries. Otechestv. Zapiski, 2002, no. 6, pp. 118–125. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518

24. Vendina O.I., Zinoviev A.S. Borderline and periphery: on the question of the context of the formation of Kaliningrad identity. Mir Rossii, 2022, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 118– 143. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1811-038X-2022-31-2-118-143

25. Volgo-Vyatskii raion. Ekonomiko-geograficheskaya kharakteristika [Volga-Vyatka District. Economic and Geographical Characteristics]. Matveev G.P., Privalovskaya G.A., Khorev B.S., Eds. Moscow: Geografgiz Publ., 1961. 535 p.

26. Zhivopisnaya Rossiya. Otechestvo nashe v ego zemel’nom, istoricheskom, plemennom, ekonomicheskom i bytovom znachenii. T. 6: Moskva i Moskovskaya promyshlennaya oblast’, ch. 1. Moskva – Sankt-Peterburg [Picturesque Russia. Our Fatherland in its Land, Historical, Tribal, Economic and Everyday Significance. Vol. 6: Moscow and the Moscow Industrial Region, part 1. Moscow– St. Petersburg]. Semyonov P.P., Ed. St. Petersburg; Moscow, 1898. 301 p.