

Climatic Factor in the Modern Cycle of Development of Socio-Natural Systems (on the Example of the Lake Imandra Basin)
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556624030098
EDN: SODLAO
Abstract
For several decades a panarchic type of social-natural system has been formed in the territory of the Imandra basin (Murmansk oblast): within certain time intervals the development of its “nature–society–economy” blocks can be multidirectional, multi-temporal and multi-scale. The modern system of nature management in the territory determines the synergy of matter-energy flows produced by the blocks, which reflects the panarchic nature of the system. The modern development cycles of the social-natural system blocks were analysed in order to reveal the mechanisms for achieving their renewal in accordance with sustainable development. This reflects the aim of the research. The analysis was based on the processing of thematic publications and statistical data, results of field ecological-landscape studies conducted by the authors. Different rates of transformation of the system blocks were clearly manifested in the 21st century, each block having different stages of development. The climatic factor controlling the development of the natural block was clearly manifested since the last third of the 20th century and stimulated the renewal of the system. The modern stage of development of the social block was characterised by the accumulation cycle of changes, and the economic block by the restructuring cycle. The socio-natural system of the territory during its development overcomes certain thresholds–turning points of its vectors changes. Signs of overcoming the threshold of disturbances destroying the natural block by reducing the anthropogenic load and intensification of the biogeochemical cycle due to climate warming have been marked. Harmonisation of development cycles is a complex management task, the solution of which requires an analysis of the specific characteristics of the system blocks, the existing obstacles to their development, the acceptable states of their restructuring and the objectives of their renewal. The socio-natural system does not have an absolute coincidence of development cycles, but the general equilibrium can be ensured by their convergence. Mechanisms have been proposed to accelerate the restructuring cycle of the social block for its renewal.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. EvseevRussian Federation
Moscow
T. M. Krasovskaya
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Barrett R.T., Hollister R.D., Oberbauer S.F., Tweedie C.E. Arctic plant responses to changing abiotic factors in northern Alaska. Amer. J. of Botany, 2015, vol. 102, no. 12, pp. 2020–2031. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400535
2. Bousquet F., Botta A., Alinovy L., et al. Resilience & development: mobilizing for transformation. Ecol. Soc., 2016, vol. 21, no. 3, art. 40. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08754-210340
3. Braat L.C., Rudolf D.G. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private Policy. Ecosyst. Serv., 2012, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011
4. Demin V.I. The principle climatic tendences at the Kola peninsula within the period of instrumental meteorological monitoring. Tr. Kol’sk. Nauch. Ts. RAN, 2012, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 98–110. (In Russ.).
5. Doklad o sostoyanii i ob okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy Murmanskoi oblasti v 2020 godu [Report on the State and Environmental Protection of the Murmansk Region in 2020]. Murmansk, 2021. 199 p.
6. Doklad o sostoyanii i ob okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy Murmanskoi oblasti v 2022 godu [Report on the State and Environmental Protection of the Murmansk Region in 2022]. Murmansk, 2023. 151 p.
7. Ekologicheskii atlas Murmanskoi oblasti [Ecological Atlas of the Murmansk Region]. Kalabin G.V., Ed. Moscow- Apatity, 1999. 48 p.
8. Ekologicheskii atlas Rossii [Ecological Atlas of Russia]. Kasimov N.S., Tikunov V.S., Eds. Moscow: Feoria Publ., 2017. 509 p.
9. Evseev A.V., Krasovskaya T.M. Cumulative effect of climatic and technogenic characteristics in panarchic geosystem in the impact zone of the Murmansk region. Geogr.: Razvit. Nauki Obrazov., 2021, vol. 2, pp. 55–59. (In Russ.).
10. Evseev A.V., Krasovskaya T.M. Technogenic energy fluxes in the lake Imandra basin, Murmansk region. Geogr.: Razvit. Nauki Obrazov., 2022, vol. 2, pp. 47–51. (In Russ.).
11. Farley J., Voinov A. Economics, socio-ecological resilience and ecosystem services. J. Environ. Manage., 2016, vol. 183, pp. 389–398.
12. Gunderson L., Holling C. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington-Covelo-London: Island Press, 2002. 507 p.
13. Kluchnikova E.M., Isaeva L.G., Masloboev V.A., et al. Scenarios for the development of the Murmansk Region key economic sectors in the context of global changes in the Arctic. Arktika: Ekol. Ekon., 2017, no. 1, pp. 19–31. (In Russ.).
14. Korytnyi L.M. Basseinovaya kontseptsiya v prirodo- pol’zovanii [Basin Concept in Nature Management]. Snytko V.A., Ed. Irkutsk: IG SO RAN, 2001. 163 p.
15. Krasovskaya T.M. Prirodopol’zovanie na Severe Rossii [Environmental Management in the North of Russia]. Moscow: URSS, 2008. 288 p.
16. May J., Hollister R., Betway K., et al. NDVI changes show warming increases the length of the green season at tundra communities in Northern Alaska: a fine- scale analysis. Front. Plant Sci., 2020, art. 1174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01174
17. Otsenochnyi doklad ob izmeneniyakh klimata i ikh posledstvii na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii: obshchee rezyume [Assessment Report on Climate Change and Its Consequences on the Territory of the Russian Federation: General Summary]. Moscow: Rosgidromet, 2008. 29 p.
18. Pascual U., Mcelwee P., Diamond S., et al. Governing for transformative change across the biodiversity– climate–society nexus. BioScience, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac031
19. Stsenarii razvitiya Murmanskoi oblasti v usloviyakh global’nykh neopredelennostei i izmenenii klimata [Scenarios for the Development of the Murmansk Region in the Context of Global Uncertainties and Climate Change]. Masloboeva V.A., Ryabovoi L.A., Klyuchnikovoi E.M., Eds. Apatity: Kol’skii Nauchnii Tsentr RAN, 2019. 52 p.
20. Vtoroi otsenochnyi doklad Rosgidrometa ob izmeneniyakh klimata i ikh posledstviyakh na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii: obshchee rezyume [The Second Assessment Report of Roshydromet on Climate Change and Its Consequences on the Territory of the Russian Federation: General Summary]. Moscow: Rosgidromet, 2014. 59 p.
21. Walker B., Holling C., Carpenter S., et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol. Soc., 2004, vol. 9, no. 2, art. 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
22. Weber J.-L. Beyond GDP: Ecosystem services as components of progress, wealth and well‐being. In Solutions for Sustaining Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services. Proc. International Conference and Workshop. Salzau Castle and Kiel University, 2010.
23. Wilson S., Wilson L., Pearson L., et al. Separating adaptive maintenance (resilience) and transformative capacity of social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc., 2013, vol. 18, no. 1, art.22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05100-18012
Review
For citations:
Evseev A.V., Krasovskaya T.M. Climatic Factor in the Modern Cycle of Development of Socio-Natural Systems (on the Example of the Lake Imandra Basin). Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2024;88(3):380-390. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556624030098. EDN: SODLAO