Spatial Regularities of LongTerm Dynamics of Passenger Flow at Moscow Metro Stations
https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697525030047
Abstract
The paper discusses the hypothesis that the spatial arrangement of Moscow metro stations influences the variability of passenger flow over time. This hypothesis is based on the fact that, due to the peculiarities of the spatial structure of the city, the passenger flow in the central part of Moscow is influenced by a larger number of factors than in the stations located in the periphery of the city, and as a result, the passenger flow in the stations located in the center of the city should be more uneven in time dynamics. The study uses topological and statistical methods to confirm this hypothesis. The spatial position of each station is calculated using the closeness centrality indicator, and two indicators are selected as parameters for the analysis: the variability of passenger flow over time (volatility), calculated using the variation coefficient, and the relative change in passenger flow volume between the beginning and the end of the study period. The results showed that stations with the highest volatility are located chaotically, but stations with medium and low volatility form more compact spatial groups according to the center-periphery gradient. The relative change in passenger traffic over the study period is determined more by the spatial location of the stations: most stations in the central part of the agglomeration core show a decrease in passenger traffic, while on the periphery there is a slowing of the rate of decrease or even growth. It is concluded that the spatial location is an important factor to consider when forecasting passenger traffic, since stations located in the city center are affected by more factors than stations located in the outskirts, which ultimately affects the volatility.
About the Author
I. V. KiselevRussian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Alfred Chu K.K., Chapleau R., Trepanier M. Driverassisted bus interview: Passive transit travel survey with smart card automatic fare collection system and applications. Transp. Res. Rec., 2009, vol. 2105, iss. 1, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/2105-01
2. Bagchi M., White P.R. The potential of public transport smart card data. Transp. Policy, 2005, vol. 12, iss. 5, pp. 464–474.
3. Barry J.J. et al. Origin and destination estimation in New York City with automated fare system data. Transp. Res. Rec., 2002, vol. 1817, iss. 1, pp. 183–187.
4. Belen'kii M.N. Ekonomika passazhirskikh perevozok [Economics of Passenger Transportation]. Moscow: Transport Publ., 1974. 271 p.
5. Bernshtein-Kogan S.V. Ocherki geografii transporta: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov [Essays on the Transport Geography: A Textbook for Universities]. Moscow: Gos. izd-vo, 1930. 348 p.
6. Brandes U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Sociol., 2001, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 163–177.
7. Cats O., Jenelius E. Dynamic vulnerability analysis of public transport networks: Mitigation effects of realtime information. Netw. Spat. Econ., 2014, vol. 14, pp. 435–463.
8. Chen M.C., Wei Y. Exploring time variants for short-term passenger flow. J. Transp. Geogr., 2011, vol. 19, iss. 4, pp. 488–498.
9. Fan Y. et al. Dynamic robustness analysis for subway network with spatiotemporal characteristic of passenger flow. IEEE Access, 2020, iss. 8, pp. 544–555.
10. Gol'ts G.A. Transport i rasselenie [Transport and Settlement Pattern]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1981. 247 p.
11. Hasan S. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of urban human mobility. J. Stat. Phys., 2013, vol. 151, pp. 304–318.
12. Kiselev I.V. Influence of the features of the spatial structure of the city on the uneven passenger traffic on the Moscow metro. In Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie problemy razvitiya i funktsionirovaniya transportnykh sistem gorodov i zon ikh vliyaniya: materialy XXVII Mezhdunarodnoi (tridtsatoi Ekaterinburgskoi) nauch.-prakt. konferentsii (19–20 iyunya 2021 g.) [Socioeconomic Problems of the Development and Functioning of Urban Transport Systems and Their Zones of Influence: Proceedings of the XXVII International (Thirtieth Yekaterinburg) Scientific and Practical Conference (June 19–20, 2021)]. Vaksman S.A., Ed. Yekaterinburg: AMB Publ., 2021, pp. 259–269. (In Russ.).
13. Makhrova A., Nefedova T., Treivish A. Moskva: Megapolis? Aglomeratsia? Megalopolis? [Moscow: Megapolis? Urban Agglomeration? Megalopolis?] Demoskop Weekly, 2012, no. 517–518. (In Russ.).
14. Nekraplennaya M.N., Namiot D.E. Analysis of metro correspondence matrices. Int. J. Open Inf. Technol., 2019, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 68–80.
15. Sedgwick P. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. BMJ, 2014, vol. 349.
16. Sørensen J.B. The use and misuse of the coefficient of variation in organizational demography research. Sociol. Methods Res., 2002, vol. 30, iss. 4, pp. 475–491.
17. Sun L. et al. Understanding metropolitan patterns of daily encounters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2013, vol. 110, iss. 34, pp. 13774–13779.
18. Sun Y., Shi J., Schonfeld P.M. Identifying passenger flow characteristics and evaluating travel time reliability by visualizing AFC data: a case study of Shanghai Metro. Public Transp., 2016, vol. 8, pp. 341–363.
19. Tan Q. et al. Statistical analysis and prediction of regional bus passenger flows. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 2019, vol. 33, iss. 11, p. 1950094.
20. Tarkhov S.A. Evolyutsionnaya morfologiya transportnykh setei [Evolutionary Morphology of Transport Networks]. Moscow: IG AN SSSR Publ., 1989. 382 p.
21. Zhao J. et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of passenger travel patterns in massive smart card data. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 2017, vol. 18, iss. 11, pp. 3135–3146.
Review
For citations:
Kiselev I.V. Spatial Regularities of LongTerm Dynamics of Passenger Flow at Moscow Metro Stations. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2025;89(3):383-393. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697525030047





























