The Methane Emission from the Large Solid Waste Landfill “Novosyolki” (St. Petersburg, Russia) Based on Mobile Measurements of Ground-Level Concentrations
https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697525050074
Abstract
Landfills for solid municipal waste are considerable sources of methane, which is one of the principal greenhouse gases. Due to the continuous formation of significant amounts of municipal waste, primarily related to the life of the population of megacities, estimates of methane emissions from the territory of large urban landfills remain relevant. In this paper, the problem is solved based on the coupling of the results of direct measurements of methane concentration with model calculations. The results of mobile measurements carried out near the “Novosyolki” municipal solid waste landfill (St. Petersburg, Russia) in April 2021 and 2024 are presented. The measurement data reveal local maxima of methane concentration in the route sections downwind of the landfill. The maximum values of CH4 concentrations recorded from a vehicle in this observation area reached ~9 ppmv, which significantly exceeds the background ground- level of ~2 ppmv. Average night and morning peak concentrations (5.0 ppmv) are noticeably higher than day and evening ones (2.3 ppmv). Numerical modeling of landfill gas aerial distribution, performed using a dispersion model taking into account the characteristics of atmospheric stability during the observation period, demonstrated qualitative agreement between the calculated ground-level methane concentrations and experimental data. Based on a comparison of the measurement results with the modeling data of the air pollution plume from the landfill territory, methane emission estimates were obtained amounting to 640 ± 190 kg CH4/hr in April 2021 and 200 ± 50 kg CH4/hr in April 2024. The observed significant decrease in emissions from 2021 to 2024 is consistent with the official information on the closure of the landfill in 2018 and the start of landfill cover and reclamation work, which continues to this day. Emissions from the territory of “Novosyolki” landfill can amount up to ~7% of the total anthropogenic methane emissions from the territory of St. Petersburg.
Keywords
About the Authors
D. V. IonovRussian Federation
St. Petersburg
M. V. Makarova
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
S. C. Foka
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
I. M. Isaev
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
References
1. Badr O., Probert S.D., O’Callaghan P.W. Atmospheric methane: Its contribution to global warming. Appl. Energy, 1991, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 273–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-2619(91)90021-O
2. Baer D.S., Paul J.B., Gupta M., O’Keefe A. Sensitive absorption measurements in the near-infrared region using off-axis integrated-cavity-output spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt., 2002, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-002-0971-z
3. Baldocchi D.D. Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: Past, present and future. Glo. Change Biol., 2003, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x
4. Bingemer H.G., Crutzen P.J. The production of methane from solid wastes. J. Geophys. Res., 1987, vol. 92, no. D2, pp. 2181–2187. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD02p02181
5. Borjesson G., Danielsson A., Svensson B.H. Methane fluxes from a Swedish landfill determined by geostatistical treatment of static chamber measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2000, vol. 34, no. 18, pp. 4044–4050. https://doi.org/10.1021/es991350s
6. Brioude J., Arnold D., Stohl A., Cassiani M., Morton D., Seibert P., Angevine W., Evan S., Dingwell A., Fast J.D., Easter R.C., Pisso I., Burkhart J., Wotawa G. The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART-WRF version 3.1. Geosci. Model Dev., 2013, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1889–1904. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1889-2013
7. Czepiel P.M., Mosher B., Harriss R.C., Shorter J.H., McManus J.B., Kolb C.E., Allwine E., Lamb B.K. Landfill methane emissions measured by enclosure and atmospheric tracer methods. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 1996, vol. 101, no. D11, pp. 16711–16719. https://doi.org/10.1029/96jd00864
8. Glagolev M.V. Inverse modelling method for the determination of the gas flux from the soil. Dinam. Okr. Sredy Glob. Izmen. Klimat., 2010, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–36. (In Russ.).
9. Glagolev M.V., Kotsyurbenko O.R., Sabrekov A.F., Litti Y.V., Terentieva I.E. Methodologies for measuring microbial methane production and emission from soils — a review. Microbiol., 2021, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261721010057
10. Hensen A., Scharff H. Methane emission estimates fromlandfills obtained with dynamic plume measurements. Water Air Soil Poll., 2001, vol. 1, pp. 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013162129012
11. Ionov D.V., Makarova M.V. Remote spectrometric measurements of atmospheric nitrogen dioxide near urban thermal power plants. Atmos. Ocean Opt., 2025, vol. 38, pp. 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856024701288
12. Ionov D.V., Makarova M.V., Hase F., Foka S.C., Kostsov V.S., Alberti C., Blumenstock T., Warneke T., Virolainen Y.A. The CO2 integral emission by the megacity of St. Petersburg as quantified from ground-based FTIR measurements combined with dispersion modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2021, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 10939–10963. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10939-2021
13. Ionov D.V., Makarova M.V., Kostsov V.S., Foka S.C. Assessment of the NOх integral emission from the St.Petersburg megacity by means of mobile DOAS measurements combined with dispersion modelling. Atmos. Pollut. Res., 2022, vol. 13, no. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101598
14. Kallistova A.Yu., Glagolev M.V., Shnyrev N.A., Kevbrina M.V., Nekrasova V.K., Chistotin M.V., Faustova E.V., Nozhevnikova A.N. Methane emission from the surface of the municipal solid waste landfill. Ekol. Khim., 2006, no. 1, no. 15, pp. 13–21. (In Russ.).
15. Karion A., Lauvaux T., Lopez Coto I., Sweeney C., Mueller K., Gourdji S., Angevine W., Barkley Z., Deng A., Andrews A., Stein A., Whetstone J. Intercomparison of atmospheric trace gas dispersion models: Barnett Shale case study. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2019, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2561–2576. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2561-2019
16. Lin J.C., Gerbi C., Wofsy S.C., Andrews A.E., Daube B.C., Davis K.J., Grainger C.A. A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 2003, vol. 108, no. D16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003161
17. Lohila A., Laurila T., Tuovinen J.-P., Aurela M., Hatakka J., Thum T., Pihlatie M., Rinne J., Vesala T. Micrometeorological measurements of methane and carbon dioxide fluxes at a municipal landfill. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2717–2722. https://doi.org/10.1021/es061631h
18. Maasakkers J.D., Varon D.J., Elfarsdottir A., McKeever J., Jervis D., Mahapatra G., Pandey S., Lorente A., Borsdorff T., Foorthuis L.R., Schuit B.J., Tol P., van Kempen T.A., van Hees R., Aben I. Using satellites to uncover large methane emissions from landfills. Sci. Adv., 2022, vol. 8, no. 32. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9683
19. Makarova M.V., Foka S.C., Ionov D.V. An experimental study of greenhouse gas flows for the urban ecosystem of the St. Petersburg agglomeration. In Materialy konferentsii: Forum estestvennykh nauk — 2024, 5–6 dekabrya 2024 g. [Conf. Proc.: Natural Sciences Forum — 2024, December 5–6, 2024]. St. Petersburg, 2024. Available at: https://e-science.expoforum.ru/ru/ (accessed: 20.08.2025). (In Russ.).
20. Maslikov V.I., Fedorov M.P. Nature-technical energy systems. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Energ., 2006, no. 5, pp.7– 16. (In Russ.).
21. Morin T.H. Advances in the eddy covariance approach to CH4 monitoring over two and a half decades. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 2018, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jg004796
22. Nozhevnikova A.N. Musornyye zalezhi — “metanovyye bomby” planety. Priroda, 1995, no. 6, pp. 25–34. (In Russ.).
23. Pasquill F. The estimation of the dispersion of windborne material. Meteorol. Mag., 1961, no. 90, pp. 33–49.
24. Reay D., Smith P. Methane and climate change. London: Routledge, 2010. 272 p.
25. Rower I.U., Geck C., Gebert J., Pfeiffer E.-M. Spatial variability of soil gas concentration and methane oxidation capacity in landfill covers. Waste Manage., 2011, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 926–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.013
26. Saunois M., et al. The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 2020, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1561–1623. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020
27. Scheutz C., Kjeldsen P., Bogner J.E., De Visscher A., Gebert J., Hilger H.A., Huber-Humer M., Spokas K. Microbial methane oxidation processes and technologies for mitigation of landfill gas emissions. Waste Manage. Res., 2009, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 409–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X09339325
28. Semenov S.M., Govor I.L., Uvarova N.E. Rol’ metana v sovremennom izmenenii klimata[The role of Methane in the Modern Climate Change]. Moscow, 2018. 106 p.
29. Serebritskii I.A. Doklad ob ekologicheskoi situatsii v Sankt-Peterburge v 2017 godu [Report on the Environmental Situation in St. Petersburg in 2017]. St. Petersburg, 2018. 158 p.
30. Shilkina S.V. Global trends in waste management and analysis of the situation In Russia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2020, vol. 7, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.15862/05ECOR120
31. Stein A.F., Draxler R.R, Rolph G.D., Stunder B.J.B., Cohen M.D., Ngan. F. NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 2015, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 2059–2077. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1
32. Terent’eva I.E., Glagolev M.V., Sabrekov A.F., Kotsyurbenko O.R. Methane emission from municipal solid waste landfills. Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., 2017, vol. 42, pp. 327–334. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373917050089
33. Wang Y., Fang M., Lou Z., He H., Guo Y., Pi X., Wang Y., Yin K., Fei X. Methane emissions from landfills differentially underestimated worldwide. Nat. Sustain., 2024, vol. 7, pp. 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01307-9
34. Wilcoxon F. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. In Breakthroughs in Statistics. Kotz S., Johnson N.L., Eds. New York: Springer, 1992, pp. 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_16
35. Woodward J.L. Atmospheric Stability Classification Schemes (Appendix A), Estimating the Flammable Mass of a Vapor Cloud. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1998. 336 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470935361
36. Zinchenko A.V., Reshetnikov A.I., Paramonova N.N., Privalov V.I., Titov V.S., Kazakova K.V., Katsnelson B.P. A study of methane and carbon dioxide emissions at solid waste landfills in the vicinity of St. Petersburg. In Prikladnaya meteorologiya. Trudy Nauchno-issledovatel’skogo tsentra distantsionnogo zondirovaniya atmosfery (filiala GGO), №4 [Applied Meteorology. Proc. of the Research Center for Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere (Branch of the Main Geophysical Observatory)], 2003, pp. 126–138. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ionov D.V., Makarova M.V., Foka S.C., Isaev I.M. The Methane Emission from the Large Solid Waste Landfill “Novosyolki” (St. Petersburg, Russia) Based on Mobile Measurements of Ground-Level Concentrations. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2025;89(5):793-808. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697525050074
JATS XML





























