Geographical Features of Federal Fiscal Support Distribution among Russian Cities through the Mechanism of Inter-Budget Transfers
https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697526010082
Abstract
The article examines the geographical differences in the distribution of direct federal financial support, implemented through the system of inter-budgetary relations, among Russian municipalities, which include cities. Based on data from the Federal Treasury, a database of consolidated budgets of Russian municipalities for 2020–2024 has been created. Of all municipal budget revenues, only those received as a result of the provision of federal support measures in the form of targeted inter-budget transfers have been considered. It has been established that support in general is distributed among municipalities proportionally to their population size, but less populated territories are a bit more prioritized. Smaller amounts of support are received by the largest cities and middle-sized municipalities with a population of 50 to 100 thousand inhabitants. There is no clear priority for rural areas in comparison with cities. The factor of having the status of a regional capital is not significant in the distribution of federal support. The sectoral structure of support funds varies significantly between urban municipalities with different population sizes: in small cities support is shifted in favor of environmental solutions, in large cities the focus is shifted to the development of education, transport infrastructure, and environmental policy. Geographically, priority is given to geostrategic territories and cities located in regions with lower levels of budget provision.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The article was written on the basis of the RANEPA state assignment research program.
About the Authors
D. Yu. Zemlyanskii
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Center for Spatial Analysis and Regional Diagnostics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
L. V. Kalinovskii
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Center for Spatial Analysis and Regional Diagnostics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
D. M. Medvednikova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Center for Spatial Analysis and Regional Diagnostics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Abdullaev A.M., Zemlyanskii D.Yu., Kalinovskii L.V., Medvednikova D.M. Socioeconomic situation of Russian urban agglomerations in 2015–2021. Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ. Nauki Zemle, 2023, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 443–470. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2023.302
2. Antonov E.V. Demographic and economic asymmetry of urban development in the Urals, Siberia, and the Far East in 1991–2014. Reg. Res. Russ., 2018, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207997051801001X
3. Brenner N. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
4. Bufetova A.N. Socioeconomic development of cities of Russia: main tendencies and factors. Mir Ekon. Upravl., 2015, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 124–138. (In Russ.).
5. Da Cruz N.F., Rode P., McQuarrie M. New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. J. Urban Aff., 2019, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1499416
6. Davies J., Imbroscio D. Theories of Urban Politics. London: SAGE Publ., 2009.
7. Denisov E.A. Socioeconomic transformation of cities of the Russian North. Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2018. (In Russ.).
8. Druzhinin P.V. The resource concentration in Moscow: impact on the economy of the Central federal district. Prostr. Ekon., 2022, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 115–140. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2022.3.115-140
9. Golubchikov O.Yu., Makhrovа A.G. Factors of unequal development of Russian cities. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2012, no. 2, pp. 54–60. (In Russ.).
10. Ivanov O.B., Buchwald E.M. Russian single-industry towns: From outsiders to leaders in economic development. ETAP: Ekon. Teor., Analiz Prakt., 2017, no. 5, pp. 7–21. (In Russ.).
11. Kotov A.V. Efficiency assessment of preferential treatment at the municipal level. Vopr. Territ. Razv., 2022, vol. 10, no. 1. Available at: http://vtr.isert-ran.ru/article/29316 (accessed: 07.08.2025). (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/tdi.2022.1.61.1
12. Kuznetsova O.V. Moscow as the federal regional policy object. Nauch. Tr. Inst. Narodokh. Prognoz. RAN, 2016, vol. 14, pp. 606–621. (In Russ.).
13. Kuznetsova O.V. Concentration of economic activity in Moscow and Saint Petersburg: trends, factors, implications for the cities. Vopr. Territ. Razv., 2018, no. 5, pp. 26–40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2018.5.97.2
14. Lazarev A.V. Small cities in the federal regional development policy. Reg. Ekon.: Teor. Prakt., 2007, no. 8, pp. 199–209. (In Russ.).
15. MacLeod G., Jones M. Renewing urban politics. Urban Stud., 2011, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2443–2472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011415717
16. Makieva I.V., Krivogov I.V. Modernization of the economy of one-company towns. Finan.: Teor. Prakt., 2011, no. 5, pp. 5–14. (In Russ.).
17. Malye goroda Rossii: novye vyzovy, sotsial’nye problemy i perspektivy [Small Cities in Russia: New Challenges, Social Issues, and Prospects]. Chernysh M.F., Markin V.V., Eds. Moscow: FNISTs RAN, 2021. https://doi.org/10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-378-2.2021
18. Markin V.V., Malyshev M.L., Zemlyanskii D.Yu. Small cities in Russia: Comprehensive development monitoring. Part 1. Monitor. Pravoprim., 2019, no. 4, pp. 46–55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21681/2226-0692-2019-4-46-55
19. Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I. Dynamics and state of cities at the end of the twentieth century. In Gorod i derevnya v Evropeiskoi Rossii: sto let peremen [City and Village in European Russia: A Hundred Years of Change]. Moscow: OGI Publ., 2001, pp. 196–225. (In Russ.).
20. Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I. Cities and towns: The polarized space of Russia. Demoscope Weekly, 2010, no. 437–438. Available at: https://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2010/0437/tema03.php (accessed: 06.08.2025). (In Russ.).
21. Oborin M.S., Sheresheva M.Y., Ivanova S.A. Analysis of state support results and development trends of Russian single-industry towns. Gos. Upravl. Elektr. Vestn., 2018, no. 68, pp. 211–241. (In Russ.).
22. Peterson P.E. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.
23. Sistema gorodov i prostranstvennoe razvitie Rossii [The Urban System and Spatial Development of Russia]. Limonov L.E. Ed. St. Petersburg: Leontief Tsentr, 2024.
24. Smirnov I.P. Srednie goroda Tsentral’noi Rossii [MediumSized Cities of Central Russia]. Tver: Tver. Gos. Univ., 2019.
25. Trebushkova I.E. Geographical analysis of the state policy of Russian science cities. Uchen. Zap. Krym. Fed. Univ. V.I. Vernadskogo. Geogr. Geol., 2022, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 20–35. (In Russ.).
26. Voroshilov N.V. Development of urban agglomerations in the European North of Russia. Federalism, 2021, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 54–74. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2021-4-54-74
27. Zemlyanskii D.Yu., Chuzhenkova V.A. Dynamics of socioeconomic development of municipalities with preferential regimes in the Far East in 2013-2020. Vestn. S.-Peterb. Univ. Nauki Zemle, 2022, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 431–453. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2022.303
28. Zemlyanskii D.Yu., Kalinovskii L.V., Makhrova A.G., Medvednikova D.M., Chuzhenkova V.A. Integrated socioeconomic development index for Russian cities. Reg. Res. Russ., 2021, vol. 11, pp. 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970520040188
29. Zubarevich N.V. Cities as centres of modernization of economy and human capital. Obshchestv. Nauki Sovrem., 2010, no. 5, pp. 5–19. (In Russ.).
30. Zubarevich N.V. Moscow compared to other major Russian cities: What the statistics show. SPERO. Sots. Polit., Ekspert., Rekommend., Obzory, 2012, no. 17, pp. 57–68. (In Russ.).
31. Zubarevich N.V. Russia’s agglomerations development: Trends, resources and governing. Obshchestv. Nauki Sovrem., 2017, no. 6, pp. 5–21. (In Russ.).
32. Zubarevich N.V., Safronov S.G. Russia largest cities development in 2010s. Reg. Issled., 2019, no. 1, pp. 39–51. (In Russ.).https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2019-1-4
Review
For citations:
Zemlyanskii D.Yu., Kalinovskii L.V., Medvednikova D.M. Geographical Features of Federal Fiscal Support Distribution among Russian Cities through the Mechanism of Inter-Budget Transfers. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2026;90(1):113-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S2658697526010082
Views:
157
JATS XML
Email this article 
