TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION OF GARDEN AND DACHA FORMATIONS IN THE SUBURBS OF PERM
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2587556618040131
Abstract
The article presents the results of the study of the collective garden and dacha movement in the suburban area of Perm. The researcher offers a new definition of collective horticulture, gardening and dacha associations of citizens: “garden-dacha formations.” Such collective forms are special associations of people – territorial communities. They exist beyond working hours, within a limited space, mainly outside the urban environment. Such communities are characterized by seasonal activity and have specific interactions with the surrounding territory. The author proposes a methodology for identifying such communities. The study revealed their quantity, distinguishing features, and territorial distribution. The majority of Perm city residents have dachas in suburban Perm municipal district. Other inhabitants of Perm krai own dachas either in Perm municipal district, or in different municipal districts nearby. The various territorial levels of garden and dacha formations reflecting features of their interaction with each other and with the surrounding territory are defined: a site, a garden, an array, a cluster, an area. Factors of spatial distribution for garden and dacha formations across the territory are singled out; their distribution taking into account geographical peculiarities of Perm krai is considered.
References
1. Averkieva K.V., Nefedova T.G. Dachas and colonization of rural areas by urban citizens in Russia: the case of the Kostroma region. Mir Rossii, 2016, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 103–128. (In Russ.).
2. Breslavsky A.S. What do we know about present-day Russian suburbs? Vestn. RUDN. Ser. Sotsciol., 2015, vol.15, no. 4, pp. 137–147. (In Russ.).
3. Burian A.P., Mikhonova M.I., and Kharina L.V. Territorial features of collective gardening in the Perm region. In Territorial’nye sottsial’no-ekonomicheskie sistemy Urala [Territorial Socio-economic Systems of the Urals]. Perm: Perm Gos. Univ., 1987, pp. 115–120. (In Russ.).
4. Vserossiiskaya sel’skokhoziaistvennaya perepis’ 2016 goda. Predvaritelnye itogi: Statisticheskii byulleten [AllRussian Agricultural Census, 2016. Preliminary Results: Statistical Bulletin]. Moscow: Statistika Rossii Publ., 2016. 70 p.
5. Gorozhane v derevne. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya v rossiiskoi glubinke: dezurbanizatsiya i sel’sko-gorodskie soobshchestva [Townspeople in Village. Sociological Research in the Russian Outback: Deurbanization and Rural-urban Communities], Il’in V.I., Pokrovskii N.E., Eds. Moscow: Universitetskaya Kniga Publ., 2016. 402 p.
6. Dacha as national peculiarity. Available at: http://more-dacha.jimdo.com/ (accessed 05.11.2014).
7. Dzhandzhugazova E.A. Dacha culture or national peculiarities of recreation. Sovremennye Problemy Servisa i Turizma, 2010, no. 2, pp. 80–84. (In Russ.).
8. Zyrianov A.I., Zyrianova I.S., Korolev А.Yu., Myshlyavtseva S.E. and Shchepetkova I.O. Recreational field of Perm agglomeration. Geographical Bulletin, 2017, no.1(40), pp. 116–123. (In Russ.).
9. Isachenko Т.Е. Main trends in the development of recreational nature management in Russia. In Geografiya i Region [Geography and Region]. Perm: Perm Gos. Univ., 2015, pp. 97–100. (In Russ.).
10. Leibovich O.L., Stegnii V.N., Kabatckov A.N., Lysenko O.V. and Shushkova N.V. Natsional’nyi vopros v gorodskom soobshchestve. Sotsiokul’turnye kharakteristiki mezhnatsionalnykh otnoshenii v bol’shom ural’skom gorode na iskhode XX veka [Ethnic Problems in City Community. Sociocultural Characteristics of the International Relations in the Big Ural City atthe end of the XX Century]. Perm: Forvard-S Publ., 2003. 238 p.
11. Malinova-Tziafeta О. Iz goroda na dachu: sotsiokul’turnye faktory osvoeniya dachnogo prostranstva vokrug Peterburga (1860–1914) [From City to Dacha: Socio-cultural Factors in the Development of the Summer Cottage around St. Petersburg (1860–1914)]. St.Petersburg: Evropeiskii Univ., 2013, 336 p.
12. Makhrova A.G., Medvedev A.A., and Nefedova T.G. Garden and settlements of citizens in the system of rural settlement pattern. Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser 5. Geogr., 2016, no. 2, pp. 64–74. (In Russ.).
13. Mezhdu domom i … domom. Vozvratnaya prostranstvennaya mobil’nost’ naseleniya Rossii [Between Home and … Home. Return Spatial Mobility of the Population of Russia], Nefedova T.G., Averkieva K.V., Makhrova A.G., Eds. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf Publ., 2016. 504 p.
14. Nefedova T.G. The Russian dachas in different scales of space and time. Demoscope Weekly, 2015, no.№657–658. Available at:http://demoscope.ru/ weekly/2015/0657/demoscope657.pdf (accessed 15.01.2016). (In Russ.).
15. Nefedova T.G., Makhrova A.G. Dacha residents between the two capitals. Geografiya, 2014, July–August, pp. 4–10. (In Russ.).
16. Nefedova T.G., Savchuk I.G. Second exurban residences of citizens in Russia and Ukraine: Evolution of dachas and trends of their post-soviet changes. Reg. Res. Russ., 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 165–173.
17. Perm municipal district of Perm Krai. Available at: http://permraion.ru/about/ (accessed 16.02.2017).
18. Polukhina Е.V. Features of social order in the post-Soviet country space: labor, generations and gender. Labirint: Zhurnal Sotsial’no-Gumanitarnykh Issledovanii, 2014, no. 3, pp. 22–31. (In Russ.).
19. Postanovlenie Pravitelstva RF ot 27.06.1996 № 758 “O gosudarstvennoi podderzhke sadovodov, ogorodnikov i vladeltsev lichnykh podsobnykh hoziaistv” [The Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of June 27, 1996 No. 758 “On the state support of gardeners, gardeners and owners of personal subsidiary farms”].
20. Public cadastral map. Available at: https://pkk5.rosreestr.ru/ (accessed 20.01.2017).
21. Putin signed a law on gardening and trucking partnerships. Available at: https://lenta.ru/news/2017/07/30/ zakon/ (accessed 01.08.2017).
22. Semyannikov V. Residential district Lower Kurya. Metrazhi. Available at: http://metragi.ru/progulki-po-permi/uliczyi,-rajonyi,-mikrorajonyi/mikrorajonnizhnyaya-kurya.html (accessed 07.12.2016).
23. Union of non-profit gardening associations of Alyoshikha of the Krasnokamsk district. Available at: http://soyuz-aleshiha.ru/ (accessed 17.03.2017).
24. The strategy of social and economic development of the Perm municipal district for 2016-2030. Annex to the decision of the Territorial meeting from 4/28/2015 No.60. Available at: http://permraion.ru/_res/fs/ file29745.pdf (accessed 19.07.2017).
25. Shchepetkova I.O. Recreational traditions of citizens and tourism. In Kurortno-rekreatsionnyi kompleks v sisteme regional’nogo razvitiya: innovatsionnye podkhody [Resort-and-Recreational Complex in the System of Regional Development: Innovative Approaches]. Krasnodar: Kuban Gos. Univ., 2016, pp. 428–431. (In Russ.).
26. Ekologo-ekonomicheskie raiony (teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty razvitiya) [Ekological and Economic Regions (Methodological Aspects of Development)], Sharygin M.D., Ed. Perm: Perm Gos. Univ., 1995. 192 p.
Graphical Abstract
|
1. Расположение садово-дачных образований вокруг Перми | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(1004KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
2. Distribution of garden and dacha formations around Perm | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(994KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
- The use of gardens and dachas by residents of Perm is a recreational tradition of the region.
- Reliable location and quantitative characteristics of garden-and-dacha sites can be found on the Russian public cadastral map.
- Gardens and dachas of the inhabitants of Perm are located within the radius of 60 km from the city.
- Garden-and-dacha sites are located on the territories, which initially had no high recreational potential.
- Gardeners and dacha residents form distinctive territorial communities.
Review
For citations:
Shchepetkova I.O. TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION OF GARDEN AND DACHA FORMATIONS IN THE SUBURBS OF PERM. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2018;(4):46-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1134/S2587556618040131