On the concept of landscapity
https://doi.org/10.1134/S2587556618050151
Abstract
We discuss the concept and term of landscapity (fr. рaysagéité, germ. Landschaftlichkeit, russ. ландшафтность), which is not so long ago appeared in the conceptual apparatus and the lexicon of geographers, architects, philosophers. The concept of landscapity arises as a kind of semantic expansion of the concept of landscape, resulted from a) historically established epistemological properties of the concept of landscape, b) the current situation of postmodern with its accompanying proliferation of the concept of landscape, c) understanding of the landscape as a supercomplex phenomenon of existence. Those new methodical, methodological and epistemological aspects, the possibilities of landscape geography, which can be formed on the basis of the concept of landscapity, are shown on specific examples, as follows: interpretation of the landscape as a machine in the understanding of G. Deleuze and F. Guattari and the use of the concept of landscape in the exact sciences; theoretical-multiple understanding of the landscape; extremely complex, does not fit into the established tradition of geographical science, existential and axiological contexts of modern landscape studies, in particular, the difficulty of methodically unified (joint) consideration of such landscape antipodes as cultural landscape and landscapoid.
About the Author
Yu. G. Tyutyunnik
Institute for Evolutionary Ecology, National Academy of Sciences, Kiev
Ukraine
Ukraine
References
1. Archimedes. Psammit. In Arkhimed. Sochineniya [Archimedes. Writings]. Moscow: Gos. Izd. Fiz.-Mat. Lit. Publ., 1962, pp. 358–367. (In Russ.).
2. Beruchashvili N.L. Geofizika landshafta. [Geophysics of Landscape]. Moscow: Vyssh. Shkola Publ., 1990. 287 p.
3. Weyl H. Matematicheskoe myshlenie [Mathematical Thinking]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1989. 400 p.
4. Grodzynskyi M.D. Landshaftna ekologіya [Landscape Ecology]. Kyiv: Znannya Publ., 2014. 550 p. (In Ukr.).
5. GusevYu.P. “Cultural landscape” of ХХ of century: “Without the Fate” of ImreKertes. In Landshafty kul’tury. Slavyanskii mir [Landscapes of Culture. Slavic World]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2007, pp. 176–188. (In Russ.).
6. Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press., 1987. 632 p.
7. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Penguin Group, 1977. 400 p.
8. Zamyatin D.N. Postgeografiya. Kapital(izm) geograficheskikh obrazov [Post-Geography. Capital(ism) of Geographical Images]. St. Petersburg: Gumanitarnaya Akademiya Publ., 2014. 592 p.
9. Isachenko A.G. Izbrannye trudy (K 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) [SelectedPapers (to the 90th Anniversary)]. St. Petersburg: BBM Publ., 2012. 486 p.
10. Kagansky V.L. Kul’turnyi landshaft i sovetskoe obitaemoe prostranstvo [Cultural Landscape and Soviet Inhabited Space]. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2001. 572 p.
11. Kizima V.V. Landscape Essence of God or “Divine” Nature of Landscape? Totallogy, 2003, vol. 10, pp. 8–53. (In Russ.).
12. Cohen P.J. Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. New York: W. A. Benjamin, 1966. 154 p.
13. Kudryashev A.Ph. Infinity in it self. In Beskonechnost’ v matematike: filosofskie i istoricheskie aspekty [Infinity in Mathematics: Philosophical and Historical Aspects]. Moscow: Yanus-K Publ., 1997, pp. 265–269. (In Russ.).
14. Losew A.Ph. Dialekticheskie osnovy matematiki. [Dialectical Basics of Mathematics]. Moscow: Academia Publ., 2013. 800 p.
15. Ozhe M. Ne-mesta. Vvedenie v antropologiyu gipermoderna [No-places. Introduction to Anthropology of Hypermodern]. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie Publ., 2017. 136 p.
16. Susskind L. The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design. Back Bay Books, 2008. 416 p.
17. Solntsev V.N. Sistemnaya organizatsiya landashafta (Problemy metodologii i teorii) [System Organization of Landscape (Problems of Methodology and Theory)]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1981. 239 p.
18. Tyutyunnik Yu.G. Geography XXI: to overcome the Earth’s gravity. Geogr. Vestn. Nauch. Zhurnal Perm. Gos. Univ., 2017, no. 2(41), pp. 5–16. (In Russ.).
19. Tyutyunnik Yu.G. Historical problems of noosferogenesis. Biosphera, 2017, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 205–213. (In Russ.).
20. Tyutyunnik Yu.G. From a-cultural landscape to landshaftoid. In Teoriya i praktika planirovaniya kul’turnogo landshafta [Theory and Practice of Planning of Cultural Landscape]. Saransk: Mordov. Univ., 2010, pp. 25–32. (In Russ.).
21. Tyutyunnik Yu.G. Problematic Issues of Cultural Landscape Theory. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2013, no. 4, pp. 36–47. (In Russ.).
22. Tyutyunnik Yu.G. Proliferation of the concept “landscape”: why does it take place and how should geographers treat it? Izv. Russ. Geogr. Obshchestva, 2013, vol. 145, no. 5, pp. 66–78. (In Russ.).
23. Tyutyunik Yu.G. Totallogiya landshafta [Totallogy of Landscape]. Kyiv: TsGO NANU Publ., 2002. 122 p.
24. Fedotova O.B. Four Elements of Empedokl: Textual Analysis of Fragments. Vopr. Istorii Estestvozn. Tekhniki, 2005, no. 2, pp. 18–56. (In Russ.).
25. Ronai M. Paysages. Hérodote, 1976, no. 7, pp. 125–159. Available at: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5621035h/f10.item.r=hérodote.langFR.zoom (accessed 26.04.18).
Review
For citations:
Tyutyunnik Yu.G. On the concept of landscapity. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2018;(5):104-114. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1134/S2587556618050151
Views:
739
Email this article 
