The Role of Retail in the Transformation of the Microdistrict Organization of the Urban Environment
https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587-55662019313-27
Abstract
The microdistrict principle of urban environment organization, developed in Soviet urban planning, formed a certain configuration of the placement of trade and services. However, the market transformations of the 1990s dramatically affected both the number of retail facilities and their location. The purpose of this research was to identify the effects of retail development for the functions and morphology of the microdistricts of Soviet construction. The work is based on empirical materials on St. Petersburg, where research was conducted based on the study of telephone books in the late 1980s, and field mapping of selected areas of the city. It was found that at the moment there was a rapprochement of the retail functions of the areas of mass housing construction and the historical center. The number and density of everyday demand objects in microdistricts increased many-fold, while goods and services of periodic demand came out on top in terms of the number of objects. Retail of episodic demand has ceased to obey the center-peripheral principle in placement. The Soviet principle of spatial monopoly was replaced by the principle of spatial competition, which significantly transformed the morphology of urban space.
Supporting agencies: This paper was supported by the Russian Academic Excellence Project at the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University.
About the Authors
K. E. Aksenov
St. Petersburg State University; Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Belarus
Belarus
A. S. Zinovyev
St. Petersburg State University
Belarus
Belarus
A. S. Zinovyev
St. Petersburg State University
Belarus
Belarus
References
1. Aksenov K., Brade I., Bondarchuk E. Transformatsionnoe i postransformatsionnoe gorodskoe prostranstvo. Leningrad – Sankt-Peterburg 1989– 2002 [Transformational and post-Transformational Urban Space. Leningrad – St. Petersburg 1989–2002]. St. Petersburg: Gelikon-plyus Publ., 2006. 284 p.
2. Aksenov K., Brade I., Roh K. Social-spatial differentiation in the residential high-stored areas of LeningradSt. Petersburg in the post soviet period. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2010, no. 1, pp. 42–53. (In Russ.).
3. Aksenov K.E. Backbone features of space-and-time in transformation of social-geographic space. Izv. Russ. Geogr. O–va, 2014, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 69–80. (In Russ.).
4. Aksenov K.E. Trends in the accessibility of public space in the post-Soviet metropolis: Shrinkage or expansion? Reg. Res. Russ., 2012, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 329–338.
5. Aksenov K.E. Evolution in the types of shopping and spatial structuring of retail trade in post-Soviet metropolis. Izv. Russ. Geogr. O–va, 2016, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 39–56. (In Russ.).
6. Gorlov V.N. Novye Cheremushki. Transition to mass introduction of microdistrict housing in the USSR in the 50-60s of the XX century. Vestn. MGOU, Ser. Ist. i Polit. Nauki, 2014, no. 2, pp. 61–68. (In Russ.).
7. Druzhinin A.G. Prostranstvennoe razvitie gorodamillionera: tendentsii postsovetskogo perioda [Millionaire City Spatial Development: Post-Soviet Tendencies]. Rostov-on-Don: Yuzniy Fed. Univ., 2008. 192 p.
8. The Rules and Norms of Planning and Development of Cities: SN 41-58. Moscow, 1959. 180 p. (In Russ.).
9. Building Regulations. The Norms of Building Design. Moscow, 1954. 405 p. (In Russ.).
10. Construction Norms and Rules: SNiP 2.07.01-89. Town Planning. Planning and Development of Urban and Rural Areas. Moscow, 1990. 56 p. (In Russ.).
11. Construction Norms and Rules: SNiP II-60-75. Planning and Development of Cities, Towns and Rural Settlements. Moscow, 1975. 67 p. (In Russ.).
12. Construction Norms and Rules: SNiP II-K.2-62. Planning and Development of Populated Areas]. Moscow, 1967. 65 p. (In Russ.).
13. Beaverstock J.V., Smith R.G., Taylor P.J. A roster of world cities. Cities, 1999, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 445–458.
14. Urban Sprawl in Europe: Landscapes, Land-Use and Policy. Couch C., Leontidou L., Petschel-Held G., Eds. Wiley-Blackwell, 2008. 294 p.
15. International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities. Derudder B., Hoyler M., Taylor P., Frank W., Eds. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012. 584 p.
16. Diao M. Are inner-city neighborhoods underserved? An empirical analysis of food markets in a U.S. metropolitan area. J. Plan. Educ. Res., 2015, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 19–34.
17. Florida R. Bohemia and economic geography. J. Econ. Geogr., 2002, no. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–71. 18. Musil J. Changing urban systems in post-communist societies in Central Europe: analysis and prediction. Urban Stud., 1993, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 899–905.
18. Nagy E. Winners and losers in the transformation of city center retailing in East Central Europe. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud., 2001, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 340–348.
19. Peri-Urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land Use Change in Europe. Nilsson K., Pauleit S., Bell S., Aalbers C., Nielsen T.S., Eds. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2013. 453 p.
20. Pan F., Xia Y. Location and agglomeration of headquarters of publicly listed firms within China’s urban system. Urban Geogr., 2014, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 757–779.
21. Perry C. The Neighborhood Unit: A Scheme of Arrangement for the Family-Life Community. In Regional Plan of N.Y. Regional Survey of N.Y. and Its Environs. New York, 1929, vol. 7, pp. 22–140.
22. Pojani D. Urban and suburban retail development in Albania's capital after socialism. Land Use Policy, 2011, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 836–845.
23. Pothukuchi K. Attracting supermarkets to inner-city neighborhoods: economic development outside the box. Econ. Dev. Q., 2005, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 232–244.
24. Simion G., Nistor C. Spatial structure changes inside post-communist capital city of Bucharest. Human Geographies – J. Stud. Res. Human Geogr., 2012, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 79–89.
25. Stanilov K. The restructuring of non-residential uses in the post-socialist. In The Post Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism. Stanilov K., Ed. Springer Netherlands, 2007, pp. 73–99.
26. Storper M., Scott A.J. Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment. Urban Stud., 2016, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1114–1136.
27. The Urban Mosaic of Post-socialist Europe: Space, Institutions and Policy. Tsenkova S., Nedovic-Budic Z., Eds. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 2006. 390 p.
28. Wrigley N. “Food deserts” in British cities: policy context and research priorities. Urban Stud., 2002, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2029–2040.
Graphical Abstract
|
|
1. Примеры реализации различных принципов трансформации кварталов с однотипной застройкой. Пример встраивания коммерческих объектов в типовое жилое здание 1970-х годов постройки | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(632KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
|
|
2. An example of the retail transformation of micro-district with the same type of building. An example of embedding of retail objects in a typical residential house built in the 1970s | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Research Instrument | |
View
(303KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
- Retail is the main factor of the post-Soviet transformation of monofunctional micro-districts into a multifunctional zone of a city.
- The ‘retail’ functions and the spatial organization of the areas of mass housing construction and of the historical centre have converged.
- The market principle has almost completely replaced the micro-district principle in the retail spatial organization.
- Micro-district required for the consumer to move from the dwelling to the retail object. Nowadays the market is moving the objects to the consumer.
- The Soviet principle of spatial monopoly was replaced in retail with the principle of spatial competition.
Review
For citations:
Aksenov K.E., Zinovyev A.S., Zinovyev A.S. The Role of Retail in the Transformation of the Microdistrict Organization of the Urban Environment. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2019;(3):13-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587-55662019313-27
Views:
872
Email this article 
