Long-Term Dynamics of Rural Household Water Use (the Case of Semlovsky Rural Settlement, Yaroslavl Oblast)

The article proves the necessity to change approaches to the development of water output system in rural settlements by improving the quality of forecast of expected changes in rural water use. The study is based on the evolution of behavioral preferences of rural households on the case of the pilot Semlovsky rural settlement of Danilovsky district of Yaroslavl oblast. This research was inspired by the logic and beauty of the methodology of studying rural water use by the outstanding geographer Gilbert White which is based on the approaches of behavioral and evolutionary geography. Through interviews and semi-structured surveys from 1976 to 2019, the study examined how rural residents provide water for themselves, choose their source of water output, and how they really value water as an economic good. The perceptions of managers in the sphere of domestic water output were also investigated and planning documents were analyzed. The study of the evolution of rural domestic water use for more than 40 years revealed the peculiarities of source selection depending on water quality, economic and technical capabilities of residents, and socio-cultural traditions. It has been established that focusing on centralized water supply, to comply with water quality standards for the population, can have the adverse effect, when the users choose a cheaper water source which is reliable and has a poorer water quality. In practical terms, the article shows it’s reasonable to apply an integrated approach to developing rural water output strategies, taking into account the adaptability of water users to different geographical conditions. It also reveals ways of including behavioral features of water use in rural areas in project and planning documents.

1. Babina Yu.V., Kochurov B.I. Problems of protection of surface water bodies in the context of land relations in the South of Russia. Yug Rossii: Ekologiya, Razvitie, 2021, vol. 16, no. 3, рр. 180–190. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2021-3-180-190

2. Balasubramaniam D., Chatterjee S., Mustard D. Got water? Social divisions and access to public goods in rural India. Economica, 2011, no. 81, pp. 140–160. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1365393

3. Baldwin G.B. Why present value calculations should not be used in choosing rural water supply technology. World Development, 1983, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1075–1081.

4. Beloborodova I.N. Traditions of Life Support: Spatio-Temporal Aspect. In Sotsiokul’turnaya metodologiya okhrany okruzhayushchei sredy [Sociocultural Environmental Protection Methodology]. FomenkoG.A., Ed. Yaroslavl’, 2001. 152 p.

5. Bobylev S.N., Goryacheva A.A. Identification and assessment of ecosystem services: an international context. Vestn. Mezhdunarodnykh Organizatsii: Obrazovanie, Nauka, Novaya Ekonomika, 2019, no. 1, pp. 225–236. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2019-01-13

6. Core questions on Drinking water and Sanitation for households surveys. World Health Organization and UNICEF, 2006. 24 р.

7. Demin A.P. Modern problems of water supply of agriculture in Russia. Prirodoobustroistvo, 2008, no. 2, рр. 37–44. (In Russ.).

8. Fomenko G.A. Upravlenie prirodookhrannoi deyatel’nost’yu: Osnovy sotsiokul’turnoi metodologii [Environmental Management: Fundamentals of Socio-Cultural Methodology]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2004. 390 p.

9. Fomenko G.A. Ustoichivyi ekosistemnyi dizain: predposylki i podkhody [Sustainable Ecosystem Design: Background and Approaches]. Yaroslavl’: Autonomous Non-Commercial Research and Development Institute “Cadaster” Publ., 2021. 216 p.

10. Fomenko G.A., Fomenko M.A. Monetary assessments of environmental resources at the micro level for managing regional development. In Polyusa i Tsentry Rosta v Regional’nom Razvitii [Poles and Centers of Growth in Regional Development]. Lipets Yu.G., Ed. Moscow, 1998, pp. 117–122. (In Russ.).

11. Fomenko G.A., Fomenko M.A. Peculiarities of providing drinking water to the rural population of the Yaroslavl region in modern conditions. Izv. Akad. Nauk., Ser. Geogr., 1999, no. 5, pp. 55–60. (In Russ.).

12. Fomenko G.A., Fomenko M.A. Ekonomicheskii tranzit i okhrana prirody: sotsiokul’turnye aspekty [Economic Transition and Environmental Protection: Socio-Cultural Aspects]. Yaroslavl: The Cadaster Research and Designing Institute Publ., 2016. 313 p.

13. Frolova T.A. The low-income trap and the role of the state on the way out of it. Ross. Ekon. Internet-Zh., 2006, no.4. (In Russ.).

14. Gazzinelli А., Souza М., Nascimento I., Cadete I., and Kloos H. Domestic water use in a rural village in Minas Gerais, Brazil, with an emphasis on spatial patterns, sharing of water, and factors in water use. Cad. Saúde Pública, 1998, vol. 14, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x1998000200003

15. Gold J. An introduction to behavioural geography. Oxford University Press Publ., 1980. 290 p.

16. Gosudarstvennyi doklad “O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2018 godu” [State report On the State of Sanitary and Epidemiological Welfare of the Population in the Russian Federation in 2018]. Federal Service for the Oversight of Consumer Protection and Welfare, 2019.

17. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Vol. 1: Recommendations. 2nd edition. Geneva: WHO, 1993. 179 р.

18. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. Geneva: WHO, 2017. 541 р.

19. Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments. Vol. 1: Coastal and Freshwaters. Geneva: WHO, 2003. 219 р.

20. Hutton G. Editorial: Can we meet the costs of achieving safely managed drinking water, sanitation and hygiene services under the new sustainable development goals? J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev., 2016, no. 6, pp. 191–194. https://doi:10.2166/washdev.2016.037

21. Irianti S., Prasetyoputra P., Saputro F., Sasimartoyo T. A review of access, safety, and use of drinking-water from various sources in Indonesia. (Unpublished Report). Jakarta: National Institute of Health Research and Development, Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia, 2014.

22. Ishmuratov B.M., Shagzhiev K.Sh. The origins of the global crisis and the problems of human life support. Vestn. Buryat. Gos. Univ. Biol. Geogr., 2018, no. 1, pp. 62–71. (In Russ.).

23. JMP Methodology: 2017 Update & SDG Baselines. WHO, UNICEF, 2018. 23 р.

24. Kapoguzov E.A., Bykova K.G. Public-private partnership as an object of institutional analysis: on the issue of systematization of formal institutions. J. Institutional Studies, 2014, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 132–145. (In Russ.).

25. Kativhu T. An analysis of sustainability of communally-managed rural water supply systems in Zimbabwe. University of the Western Cape, 2016. 262 р.

26. Kolosovskii N.N. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Writings]. Smolensk: Oikumena Publ., 2006. 336 p.

27. Koronkevich N.I., Barabanova E.A. and Zaitseva I.S. Assessment of Modern Water Consumption in the World and on Continents and Its Impact on the Annual River Runoff. Herald Russ. Acad. Sci., 2022, vol. 92, no. 2, pp.199–206. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622020034

28. Korytnyi L.M., Gagarinova O.V., Il’icheva E.A., KichiginaN.V. Development of the Siberian landscape and hydrological school. Vodn. Khozyaistvo Rossii, 2018, no. 4, pp. 92–106. (In Russ.).

29. Loshadkin K.A. Vodosnabzhenie sel’skogo naseleniya v usloviyakh transformatsii geoekonomicheskogo prostranstva [Water Supply of the Rural Population in the Context of the Transformation of the Geo-economic Space]. Yaroslavl’: NPP “Cadaster”, 2001. 164 p.

30. Lund J.R. Integrating social and physical sciences in water management. Water Resour. Res., 2015, vol. 51, pp.5905–5918. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017125

31. Makkonel K.R., Bryu S.L. Ekonomika: printsipy, problem i politika [Economics: Principles, Problems and Politics]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Republic Publ., 1992. 399 p. (In Russ.).

32. Malysheva A.V. and Kozina L.N. On the problems of rural water supply and ways to solve them. Vestn. NGIEI, 2015, no. 6 (49). (In Russ.).

33. McKee М., Balabanova D., Akingbade К., Pomerleau J., Stickley А., Rose R., and Haerpfer С. Access to water in the countries of the former Soviet Union. Public Health, 2006, no. 120 (4), pp. 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2005.05.013

34. Nikul’nikov Yu.S. Ecological and geographical bases of assessment of economic development of the territory. In Geografiya osvoeniya resursov Sibiri [Geography of Development of Siberian Resources]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1979, pp. 3–10. (In Russ.).

35. Omarova А., Tussupova К., Hjorth Р., Kalishev М., and Dosmagambetova R. Water Supply Challenges in Rural Areas: A Case Study from Central Kazakhstan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2019,no.16 (5),688p. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050688

36. Ostrom E. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2010, no. 2, pp. 1–12.

37. Perelet R.A. Water scarcity and the economics of water efficiency. Geogr. Ekologiya v Shkole XXI veka, 2013, no.10, pp. 7–22. (In Russ.).

38. Perelet R.A. Privatize water or water supply and sanitation? Ekologiya Promyshlennosti, 2013, no. 8, pp. 27–33. (In Russ.).

39. Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene – 2017. Update and SDG Baselines. WHO, UNICEF. Geneva: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 2017. 57 р.

40. Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Report of the Secretary-General. E/2017/66. United Nations, 2017. 19 р.

41. Pulyarkin V.A. Lokal’nye tsivilizatsii vo vremeni i prostranstve (vzglyad geografa) [Local Civilizations in Time and Space (Geographer’s View)]. Moscow: Eslan Publ., 2005. 536 p.

42. Roberts B. еt al. Changes in household access to water in countries of the former Soviet Union. J. Public Health, 2012, no. 34 (3), pp. 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr115

43. Skhemavodosnabzheniya i vodootvedeniya Seredskogo sel’skogo poseleniya Danilovskogo munitsipal’nogo raiona Yaroslavskoi oblasti. Aktualizatsiya na 2018 god [Scheme of Water Supply and Sanitation of the Seredsky Rural Settlement of the Danilovsky Municipal District of the Yaroslavl Oblast. Update for 2018]. Ivanovo, 2018. 70 p.

44. Sridhar M.K.C., Okareh O.T., Mustapha М. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices on Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in Some Selected LGAs in Kaduna State, Northwestern Nigeria. J. Envir. PublicHealth,2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6532512

45. Thompson J., Porras I., Katui-Katua М., Mujwahuzi М., and Tumwine J. Drawers of Water II: assessing change in domestic water use in East Africa. Practical Action Publ., 2003, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00927.x

46. Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Transforming the Regional Agenda towards Equitable Access to Safe and Sustainable Services. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 2017.

47. White G., Bradley D., and White А. Drawers of Water: Domestic Water Use in East Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972. 306 р.

48. White G., White A., Bradley D. Domestic water use in East Africa. Geografiya, resursy i okruzhayushchaya sreda. Selected articles: transl. from English. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1990, pp. 352–381. (In Russ.).