Preview

Transformation of the Macroregional Structure of the International Trade under Globalization

https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2015-4-12-23

Abstract

Against increasing number of works dealing with multiple aspects of globalization many researchers and observers tend to believe that the international trade is getting more globalized. The article sets criteria – the share of regional trade and the degree of matching of a region’s (or country’s) geographical structure of exports to that of the world’s imports – which allow us to understand whether the international trade can be referred to as a really global one.

The results of the research show that many countries tend to trade with their regional counterparts rather than with regional outliers. Besides, the article considers the peculiarities of the geographical structure of international trade in various product groups and reveals that raw materials and fuels tend to be traded inter-regionally, whereas finished goods as well as intermediate goods are mainly exchanged within regions.

As long as intra-industry trade is thought to be one of the features of the modern stage of globalization, exports-imports operations in automotive, offi ce and consumer electronics, clothing and furniture industries are considered as examples of such trade. The main finding was that the intra-industry trade tended to have stronger presence in technologically advanced industries, whereas inter-industry trade was more typical of labor-intensive ones.

Finally, the article presents a classification of countries based on the peculiarities of the geographical structure of their exports. It shows that today the external trade of very few countries can be thought of as a really global one.

About the Author

I. N. Pankratov
Faculty of Geography, Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Moscow


References

1. Безруков Л.А. Континентально-океаническая дихотомия в международном и региональном развитии. Новосибирск: Гео, 2008. 370 с.

2. Мироненко Н.С. Введение в географию мирового хозяйства: Международное разделение труда: Учебное пособие для студентов вузов. М.: Аспект-Пресс, 2006. 239 с.

3. Панкратов И.Н., Федорченко А.В. Типология стран по их роли и участию в мировой швейной промышленности // Вестн. МГУ. Сер. 5. География. 2010. № 5. С. 42–47.

4. Синцеров Л.М. Проблемы глобальной интеграции // Изв. РАН. Сер. геогр. 2005. № 4. С. 5–12.

5. Синцеров Л.М. Эпоха ранней глобализации в истории мирового хозяйства // Вестн. историч. географии. М.: ИГ РАН, 2005. Вып. 3. С. 58–79.

6. Смирнягин Л.В. Место вместо местоположения? (О сдвигах в фундаментальных понятиях географии) // Географическое положение и территориальные структуры: памяти И.М. Маергойза. М.: Нов. хронограф, 2012. С. 421–456.

7. Фетисов А.С. Фактор соседства в международных социально-экономических взаимодействиях // Географическое положение и территориальные структуры: памяти И.М. Маергойза. М.: Нов. хронограф, 2012. С. 518–533.

8. Шишков Ю.В. Интернационализация производства – новый этап в развитии мировой экономики. М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2009. 93 с.

9. Dicken P. Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy. 5th edition. London, Sage Publications Ltd, 2007. 600 p.

10. Friedman T. The World Is Flat: A Brief History Of The Twenty First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005. 488 p.

11. Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A. The Spatial Economy Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2001. 384 p.

12. Ghemawat P. World 3.0: Global Prosperity and How To Achieve It. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press, 2011. 400 p.

13. Ghemawat P., Altman S. DHL Global Connectedness Index 2012. IESE Business School, 2012.

14. Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange. NBER Working paper series, Working paper 11005. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004. 55 p.

15. Hummels D., Schaur G. Time as a trade barrier. NBER Working paper series, Working paper 17758. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2012. 54 p.

16. Levitt T. Globalization of Markets. Harvard Business Review. May–June, 1983. Р. 92–101.

17. Reshaping Economic Geography. World Development Report 2009. Washington: The World Bank, 2009. 408 p.

18. The WTO and the preferential trade agreements: From co-existence to coherence. World Trade Report 2011. Geneva: WTO, 2011. 253 p.

19. Trade patterns and global value chains in East Asia: From trade in goods to trade in tasks. Geneva: IDE–JETRO and World Trade Organization, 2011. 129 p.

20. United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database [URL: http://comtrade.un.org/db/ (дата обращения 31.03.2013).

21. Venables A. Shifts in Economic Geography and Their Causes [URL:http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0767.pdf (дата обращения 17.06.2013).


Review

For citations:


Pankratov I.N. Transformation of the Macroregional Structure of the International Trade under Globalization. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2015;(4):12-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2015-4-12-23

Views: 885


ISSN 2587-5566 (Print)
ISSN 2658-6975 (Online)