COSMOPOLITAN CITIES AND THE CHALLENGE OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY
https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2016-4-43-51
Abstract
The article is devoted to the actual theme of modern urban science – the multiculturalism of the city. Author asks the question how the cosmopolitan cities of the past, where there were no modern institutions, developed civic society, public administration and services, and police units, could manage without conflict by the coexistence of the groups, characterized by different ethnic and cultural identities. To understand the everyday practice of the multiculturalism at the time, the cases of medievalCordobaand Ottoman’sConstantinoplehave been analyzed. The author resumes that there are two key factors impacting the policy in the chosen cities: 1) the practical necessity of intercultural contacts that is “forced” to tolerance, and 2) the development of the common market of theMediterranean. Sensitivity of the cosmopolitan cities to geopolitical context is pointed out. Integrated under the conditions of a strong state and growing economy, when wealth, status and power motivate peoples to integrate, these cities lose this ability as their geopolitical position weakens. Cosmopolitanism ensures the city’s participation in global processes, but sustainable development depends rather on local factors. To conclude, the author emphasizes that in actual conditions, when the “needs” in multiculturalism as some kind of “compulsion” are missing, cosmopolitanism erodes the local social capital and paradoxically generates not tolerance, but the demand for increase of control.
About the Author
O. I. Vendina
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Алмонд Г.А., Верба С. Гражданская культура // Полития. 2010. № 2 (57). С. 122–144; № 3–4 (58–59). С. 207–221.
2. Кларк Г., Мунен Т. Глобальные города и национальные государства: новый курс на партнерство в 21 веке. М.: Московский урбанистический форум. 2014. 106 с.
3. Ланда Р. Средизмноморье: общность истории и культуры // Отечественные записки. 2004. № 5 (20). Доступ: http://www.strana-oz.ru/users/landa-robert.
4. Лобовикова К.И. Христианство, иудаизм и ислам в трактате Георгия Трапезундского “О вечной славе самодержца и его мировом владычестве” // Античная древность и средние века. 2003. Вып. 34. С. 399–414.
5. Нусбаум M. Патриотизм и космополитизм // Логос. 2006. № 2(53). С. 110–119.
6. Олюнин С. Имперские структуры управления и этноконфессиональные общины в Османском султанате // Журнал международного права и международных отношений. 2012. № 1. С. 50–55.
7. Рансимен С. Падение Константинополя в 1453 году. М.: Наука, 1983. 200 с.
8. Скржинская Е.Ч. Генуэзцы в Константинополе в XIV в. // Византийский временник. 1947. Т. 1 (XXIV). С. 215–234.
9. Abu-Lughod J.L. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America’s Global Cities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999. 580 p.
10. Abu-Lughod J.L. The Islamic City: Historic Myth, Islamic Essence and Contemporary Relevance // International Journal of Middle East Studies. 1987. Vol. 19. P. 155–176.
11. Beck U. The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies // Theory, Culture and Society. 2002. Vol. 19(1). P. 17–44.
12. Clot A. Mehmet II. Le conquérant de Byzance. Paris: Perrin, 1990. 329 p.
13. Collins R. “Balkanization” or “Americanization”: A Geopolitical Theory of Ethnic Change / Macrohistory: Essays in Sociology of the Long Run. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999. P. 70–109.
14. Derrida J. Cosmopolites de tous les pays, encore un effort! Paris: Galilée, 1997. 57 p.
15. Emon A.M. The contract of protection: a legal instrument of political inclusion and marginalization / Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: Dhimmis and Others in the Empire of Law. Oxford Univ. Press, 2012. P. 69–71.
16. Fletcher R. Moorish Spain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1992. 189 p.
17. Hannerz U. Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture // Theory, Culture and Society. 1990. Vol. 7. P. 237–251.
18. Hastaoglou-Martinidis V. Visions of Constantinople/ Istanbul from Nineteenth Century Guidebooks. // Proc. ACSA Int. Congress, New York: ACSA Press, 2001. P. 8–13.
19. Hillenbrand R. The ornament of the world: medieval Córdoba as a cultural centre // The Legacy of Muslim Spain / Ed. by Jayyusi. S.Kh. Leiden: Brill, 1992. P. 112–135.
20. Mansel Ph. Constantinople. City of the World’s Desire. 1453–1920. London: John Murray (Publishers), 1995. 544 p.
21. Menocal M.R. The Ornament of the World: How Jews, Christians, and Muslims Created a Culture of Tolerance in Medieval Spain. NY: Little, Brown and Company, 2002. 315 p.
22. Ossewaarde M. Cosmopolitanism and the Society of Strangers // Current Sociology. 2007. Vol. 55 (3). P. 367–388.
23. Rogozen-Soltar M. Al-Andalus in Andalusia: Negotiating Moorish history and regional identity in southern Spain // Anthropological Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 80. No. 3. P. 863–886.
24. Schofield M. The Stoic Idea of the City. The University of Chicago Press, 1999. 196 p.
25. Sennett R. Cosmopolitanism and the Social Experience of Cities // S. Vetrovec S. & R. Cohen R. (Eds) Conceiving Cosmopolitanism. Theory, Context and Practice. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002. P. 42–47.
26. Sennett R. The Fall of Public Man. Penguin (New edition), 2003. 416 p.
27. Sennett R. Together: The Rituals, Pleasures, and Politics of Cooperation. Yale University Press, 2012. 336 p.
28. Tolan Jh. Au-delà des mythes de la coexistence interreligieuse: contacts et frictions quotidiens d’après des sources juridiques de l’Espagne médiévale // Cahiers de la Méditerranée. 2013. Vol. 86. P. 225–236.
29. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism. Theory, Context and Practice / Vetrovec S., Cohen R. (Eds). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002. 320 p.
30. Viallon M. La lettre à Mehmet II ou le loup et l’agneau // Cahiers d’études italiennes. 2011. No.13. P. 129–139.
31. Waldron J. What is cosmopolitan? // Journal of Political Philosophy. 1992. Vol. 8(2). P. 227–243.
32. Ye’or B. Islam and Dhimmitude: Where civilization collide. N.J.: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002. 528 p.
Review
For citations:
Vendina O.I. COSMOPOLITAN CITIES AND THE CHALLENGE OF CULTURAL DIVERSITY. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2016;(4):43-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2016-4-43-51
Views:
1041
Email this article 
