THE BORDER OF RUSSIA WITH ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA IN FOUR SCALES (THE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE)
https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2016-4-109-118
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of social representations about Abkhazian and South Ossetian sections of the border of the Russian Federation through the analysis of relevant discourse that is formed by Nezavisimaya Gazeta. The study was based on a database of publications collected during the continuous content analysis of edition in three periods: 1994–1995, 2000–2003 and 2008–2012. The unclear legal status of the disputed segments of the border determines the multiplicity of approaches to their perception. Four basic images of border corresponding to four scale levels of discourse are identified: the border of Russia and Abkhazia/South Ossetia, the border of Russia and Georgia, the border of Russia and the West, the border of North and South Caucasus. Different levels of discourse can reflect different points of view on the conflict (Russian, Georgian, Abkhazian/South Ossetian), differ by the nature of spatial perception of border (line or stripe), etc. Each segment of the discourse has its own set of nodal motifs. Some of the motifs act as “vertical” (cross-cutting) in a modified form participating in the formation of discourse at each level (integration of Russia and South Ossetia – annexation of South Ossetia by Russia – struggle between Russia and the West for influence in the South Caucasus – preservation of the unity of the Caucasian region). This ensures the interconnection of images, the unity and structuring entire studied discourse.
Keywords
About the Authors
T. A. GalkinaRussian Federation
F. A. Popov
Russian Federation
References
1. Андерсон Б. Воображаемые сообщества. Размышления об истоках и распространении национализма. М.: КАНОН-пресс-Ц, 2001. 288 с.
2. Вендина О.И., Колосов В.А., Попов Ф.А., Себенцов А.Б. Украина в политическом кризисе: образ России как катализатор противоречий // Полис. Политические исследования. 2014. № 5. С. 50–67.
3. Замятин Д.Н. Феноменология географических образов // Новое литературное обозрение. 2000. № 6(46). С. 255–274.
4. Колосов В.А., Зотова М.В. Геополитическое видение мира российскими гражданами: почему Россия не Европа? // Полис. Политические исследования. 2012. № 5. С. 170–186.
5. Колосов В.А., Себенцов А.Б. Северный Кавказ в российском геополитическом дискурсе // Полис: Политические исследования. 2014. № 2. С. 146–163.
6. Колосов В.А. Теоретическая лимология: новые подходы // Международные процессы. 2003. Т. 1. № 3(3). С. 44–49.
7. Попов Ф.А. География сецессионизма в современном мире. М.: Новый Хронограф, 2012. 672 с.
8. Попов Ф.А. Дробление политического пространства мира: основные формы и современные тенденции // Региональные исследования. 2015. № 2(48). C. 64–72.
9. Попов Ф.А. Пространственные аспекты деградации и краха суверенного государства // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2014. № 7. С. 78–86.
10. Себенцов A.Б., Колосов В.А. Феномен неконтролируемых территорий в современном мире // Полис. Политические исследования. 2012. № 2. С. 31–46.
11. Kolossov V. and Toal G. An Empire’s Fraying Edge? The North Caucasus Instability in Contemporary Russian Geopolitical Culture // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2007. Vol. 48. № 2. P. 202–225.
12. McColl R.W. The Insurgent State: Territorial Bases of Revolution // Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 1969. Vol. 59. № 4. P. 613–631.
13. Mylonas H. and Ahram A.I. De Facto States Unbound // PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo № 374, 2015. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memos-pdf/Pepm374_Mylonas-Ahram_August2015_0.pdf
14. O’Loughlin J., Kolossov V., and Toal G. Inside Abkhazia: Survey of Attitudes in a De Facto State // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2011. Vol. 27. № 1. P. 1–3.
15. O’Loughlin J., Kolossov V., and Toal G. Inside the post-Soviet de facto states: A comparison of attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia and Transnistria // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2014. Vol. 55. Issue 5. P. 423–456.
Review
For citations:
Galkina T.A., Popov F.A. THE BORDER OF RUSSIA WITH ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA IN FOUR SCALES (THE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE). Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2016;(4):109-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2016-4-109-118