INTERRELATION OF HOUSING CONSTRUCTION IN MOSCOW AGGLOMERATION AND MIGRATION TO THE CAPITAL REGION
https://doi.org/10.7868/S2587556618010010
Abstract
Housing construction inMoscowagglomeration is a key mechanism stimulating migration inflow because it forms a downward pressure on housing prices, which are the most important barrier for migration. Positive feedback between extensive way of development of theMoscowagglomeration and migration inflow into the capital region stimulates hyperconcentration of the population and economic activity. Theoretical analysis shows that there is equilibrium between housing construction and migration inflow to theMoscowregion. According to our estimates, in the 2000-s the relation of migration inflow to housing construction volume (capability of theMoscowagglomeration to accumulate migration) has halved in comparison to the 1990s. Mathematical modeling and empirical data show that this shift was determined by the increase in natural rent distributed inRussiaand in agglomeration economies in other major cities of the country. Especially favorable for migration inflow is oil-spot-style extensive way of development of the agglomeration due to the dominance of largegreenfieldprojects of affordable housing in the 30-km zone outside the Moscow Ring Road in housing construction. It is shown that the development of this zone is a key regulator of the migration balance at the national level. Extensive way of development is subsidized by the government through multiple channels, primarily investments in transport infrastructure, what contradicts official goals of the regional policy and the government efforts to mitigate interregional inequality through the fiscal redistribution.
About the Authors
Nikolai K. KurichevRussian Federation
Moscow
Ekaterina K. Kuricheva
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Averkieva K.V., Antonov E.V., Kirillov P.L., Makhrova A.G., Medvedev A.A., Neretin А.S., Nefedova T.G., Treivish A. Mezhdu domom i … domom. Vozvratnaya prostranstvennaya mobil’nost’ naseleniya Rossii [Between the Нouse and… the Нouse. Return Spatial Mobility of the Population of Russia]. T.G. Nefedova, K.V. Averkieva,A.G. Makhrova, Eds. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf Publ., 2016. 504 p. DOI: 10.15356/BHAH2016.
2. Antonov E.V. Socioeconomic development and labor markets of cities of the Urals, Siberia and the Far East in 1990–2010 years. Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2016. 27 p.
3. Golubchikov O. Yu., Makhrova A.G., Phelps N.A. Modern processes of urbanization in the suburbs: the phenomenon of «edge city». ACADEMIA. Architecture and Construction, 2010, no. 4, pp. 63–68. (In Russ.).
4. Gorkina T.I. Regional structure of the Russian banking system at the present stage. Reg. Issled., 2013, no. 4, pp. 59–67. (In Russ.).
5. Druzhinin A. G. Spatial capabilities and barriers of postindustrial Metropolitan regional development (the case study of Rostov-on-Don). Reg. Issled., 2013, no. 2, pp. 25–32. (In Russ.).
6. Zubarevich N.V., Safronov S.G. Territorial income disparity in the population of Russia and other large postSoviet countries. Reg. Issled., 2014, no. 4 (46), pp. 100–110. (In Russ.).
7. Zubarevich N.V. Moscow on the background of other biggest Russian cities: what the statistics show. SPERO, 2012, no. 17, pp. 57–68. (In Russ.).
8. Zubarevich N. V. Metropolitan status income. Pro et Contra, 2012, vol. 16, no. 6 (57), pp. 6–18. (In Russ.).
9. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchyan N.V. The role of migration in enhancing contrasts of settlement pattern at the municipal level in Russia. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2016, no. 5, pp. 46–59. (In Russ.).
10. Kitova K. The role of migration in changing population of Moscow and Moscow oblast: the experience of assessment based on the censuses data of 1989, 2002 and 2010. Demoscope Weekly, 2012, no. 519–520. Available at: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2012/0519/analit05.php (accessed 18.06.2017). (In Russ.).
11. Kurichev N.K. Housing construction in Moscow agglomeration: spatial equilibrium modelling. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2016, no. 6, pp. 44–58. (In Russ.).
12. Kuricheva E.K. Housing construction as a key factor in spatial transformation of the Moscow Metropolitan area. In Sbornik dokladov XVII Aprel’skoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva [Collection of Reports XVII April International Scientific Conference on Problems of Development of Economy and Society]. Vol. 1. Yasin E.G., Ed. Мoscow: NRU HSE, 2017, pp. 352–362. (In Russ.).
13. Makhrova A.G., Kirillov P.L., Bochkarev A.N. Work Commuting of the Population in the Moscow Agglomeration: Estimating Commuting Flows Using Mobile Operator Data. Reg. Issled., 2016, no. 3, pp. 71–82. (In Russ.).
14. Makhrova A.G., Nefedova T.G., Treivish A.I. Moskovskaya oblast’ segodnya i zavtra: tendentsii i perspektivy prostranstvennogo razvitiya [Moscow Oblast Today and Tomorrow: Trends and Prospects of Spatial Development]. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf Publ., 2008, 344 p.
15. Makhrova A. G., Nefedova T. G., Treivish A. I. Prostranstvennye tendentsii social’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Moskovskoi aglomeratsii [Spatial Trends in Socioeconomic Development of the Moscow Agglomeration]. Territoriya i Planirovanie, 2012, no. 4 (40), pp. 18–34. (In Russ.).
16. Mkrtchyan N. V. Migration in Moscow and Moscow oblast: regional and structural features. Reg. Issled., 2015, no. 3, pp. 107–116. (In Russ.).
17. Mkrtchyan N.V. Dynamics of population of Russian regions and the role of migration: critical assessment based on the censuses of 2002 and 2010. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2011, no. 5, pp. 28–41. (In Russ.).
18. Mkrtchyan N.V., Karachurina L.B. Migration in Russia: flows and centers of gravity. Demoscope Weekly, 2014, no. 595–596. Available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2014/0595/tema03.php (accessed 21.06.2017). (In Russ.).
19. Nozdrina N.N. Migrants on the housing market in cities of Russia (on materials of sociological polls). In Doklad na VIII Natsional’nom Kongresse po nedvizhimosti [Report on VIII National Congress on Real Estate]. Moscow, 2004. Available at: http://www.realtymarket.ru/docs/lib_46.htm (accessed 18.06.2017). (In Russ.).
20. Nozdrina N.N. Some of the migration issues. Zhurnal Novoi Ekonomicheskoi Assotsiatsii, 2011, no. 9, pp. 189–191. (In Russ.).
21. Otkrytyi byudzhet Moskvy. Razvitie transportnoi sistemy [Open Budget of Moscow. The Development of the Transport System]. Available at: http://budget.mos.ru/gp_transport (accessed18.06.2017). (In Russ.).
22. Polterovich V.M., Popov V.V., Tonis A.S. Income concentration, instability of democracy and economic growth. Ekon. Matemat. Metody, 2009, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 15–29. (In Russ.).
23. Rosstat. Regions of Russia. Socioeconomic indicators. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/catalog/doc_1138623506156 (accessed 21.06.2017).
24. Sternik G.M., Sternik S.G., Vityazeva O. Yu. The residential real estate market in cities of Russia in 2017: there has been stabilized, but the decline continues. Available at: http://realtymarket.ru/analiti-eskie-materiali/Sternik-G.M.-Sternik-S.G.-Vityazeva-O.-Rinok-jiloinedvijimosti-gorodov-Rossii-v-2017-godu-nametilasstabilizaciya-no-i-spad-prodoljaetsya.html (accessed 29.07.2017). (In Russ.).
25. Treivish A.I. Gorod, raion, strana i mir. Razvitie Rossii glazami stranoveda [City, Region, Country and the World. The Development of Russia by the Eyes of a Geographer]. Moscow: Novyi Khronograf Publ., 2009, 372 p.
26. Trutnev E.K. New Moscow is illegal? Proekt Rossiya, no. 67, 2013. (In Russ.).
27. Alonso W. Location and Land Use: Toward a General Theory of Land Rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1964, 204 p.
28. Avner P., Viguié V., Hallegatte S. Modélisation de l’effet d’une taxe sur la construction – Le Versement pour SousDensité. Revue de l OFCE, 2013, 128(2), pp. 341–364.
29. Burgess E. The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project. Park R.E., Burgess E.W., McKenzie R.D. The city. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1967, pp. 47–62.
30. Duranton G., Puga D. Urban Land Use. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. V. 5. Duranton, G., Henderson V., Strange W., Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 467–560.
31. Ellison G., Glaeser E.L., Kerr W. What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns. Am. Econ. Rev., 2010, 100 (3), pp. 1195–1213.
32. Kashnitsky I., Gunko M. Spatial variation of in-migration to Moscow: testing the effect of housing market. Cities, 2016, 59, pp. 30–39.
33. Kolko J. Agglomeration and Co-Agglomeration of Services Industries. MPRA Paper 3362, University Library of Munich, Germany, 2007, 46 p.
34. Rosenthal S.S., Strange W.C. The determinants of agglomeration. J. Urban Econ., 2001, 50(2), pp. 191–229.
35. Union des Maires et des Élus de l’Eure L’actualité de l’urbanisme Journées d’information. Available at: http://www.eure.gouv.fr/content/download/2173/14778/file/Diaporama_UMEE_2011.pdf (accessed 26.06.2017).
Graphical Abstract
|
1. Structure of model of interaction between interregional migration and housing location in Moscow urban agglomeration | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(333KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
- There is positive feedback and equilibrium ratio between migration inflow and housing construction in the Moscow agglomeration.
- In the 2000s, an ability of the Moscow agglomeration to accumulate migration fell by half in comparison with the 1990s.
- Outside the Moscow Automobile Ring Road (MKAD) the share of non-residents homebuyers is twice higher than in Moscow and reaches 25–35%.
- Housing construction in the 30-km zone outside the MKAD is a key regulator of migration balance at the national level.
Review
For citations:
Kurichev N.K., Kuricheva E.K. INTERRELATION OF HOUSING CONSTRUCTION IN MOSCOW AGGLOMERATION AND MIGRATION TO THE CAPITAL REGION. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2018;(1):5-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S2587556618010010