Social Space of Moscow: Peculiarities and Patterns

The article presents results of the research project aimed to explore intra-urban differences in Moscow. The concept of “social space” – a dual reality, which is derived from both social relations and territorial characteristics, was employed as a theoretical background of the research. Various quantitative parameters for each of 125 Moscow municipal districts were used. They include data of Census-2010, current socioeconomic and demographic statistics, migration data, results of recent electoral campaigns, real estate indicators and local survey data. The indexes of ethnic diversity, demographic shifts, urban environment diversification, people feelings, and place reputation were calculated. A  few classifications of Moscow districts are proposed. Maps showing different dimensions of the social space of Moscow are presented. The comparative analysis of the constructed images reveals an increasing fragmentation and polarization of Moscow social space: the cleavages became more apparent, the socio-spatial gradients have risen. The inequality strengthening led to a tangible division in the level of amenities by municipal districts, to the improvement of urban environment and increase in benefits in some areas, and stagnation in another. The authors conclude that politics targeted at improving the connectivity of the urban spaces and the social milieus, as well at adjusting diversity of urban environment with diversity of urban population, is required to reduce a risk of segregation. This kind of politics and activities is most in demand in the areas where the growth of ethnic and cultural diversity of local residents takes place in the context of development deficiency, relative isolation, and social exclusion.

Moscow, social space, segregation, spatial model, typology, group interactions, ethno-cultural diversity

1. Bourdieu P. Sotsiologiya sotsial'nogo prostranstva [Sociologie de L’espace Social]. Shmatko N.A., Ed. Moscow: Inst. Eksperimental'noi Sotsiologii; St. Petersburg: Aleteiya Publ., 2007. 288 p.

2. Varshaver E.A., Rotcheva A.L. Café communities as an environment for the ethnic integration of migrants in Moscow. Monitoring Obshchestv. Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i Sotsial'nye Peremeny, 2014, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 104–114. (In Russ.).

3. Vendina O.I. Private and public in urban space: from theory to Moscow realities. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2009, no. 2, pp. 28–38. (In Russ.).

4. Vendina O.I. Social atlas of Moscow. Proekt Rossiya, 2012, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 3–40. (In Russ.).

5. Vendina O.I. Migranty v Moskve. Grozit li rossiiskoi stolitse etnicheskaya segregatsiya [Migrants in Moscow: Is Ethnic Segregation Threatening Moscow?]. Moscow: Tsentr Migratsionnykh Issled., 2015. 90 p.

6. Vendina O.I., Aksenov K.E. Moscow and Petersburg: reorganisation of urban spaces as an indicator of the urban development concept change. Probl. Prognozirovaniya, 1999, no. 5, pp. 103–121. (In Russ.).

7. Volkov D.A. The protest movement in Russia seeing by political leaders and activists. Vestn. Obshchestv. Mneniya, 2012, vol. 113, no. 3–4, pp. 141–185. (In Russ.).

8. Vysokovskii A.A. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 2: Practice. Moscow: Gray Matter Publ., 2015. 397 p.

9. Arkheologiya periferii [Archeology of Periphery]. Grigoryan Yu.E., Ed. Moscow: MUF, 2013. 480 p.

10. Gudkov L.D. Transferred aggression: The Russians’ attitude to migrants. Vestn. Obshchestv. Mneniya. Dannye. Analiz. Diskussii, 2005, no. 6, pp. 60–77. (In Russ.).

11. Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House Publ., 1961. 458 p. 12. Zaionchkovskaya Zh., Poletaev D., Doronina K., Mkrtchyan N., Florinskaya Yu. Zashchita prav moskvichei v usloviyakh massovoi migratsii [Protecting the Rights of Muscovites within the Context of Mass Migration]. Moscow: Tsentr Migratsionnykh Issled., 2014. 120 p.

12. Immigranty v Moskve [Immigrants in Moscow]. Zaiochkovskaya Zh.A., Ed. Moscow: Tri Kvadrata Publ., 2010. 270 p.

13. Kapkov S.A. Development of urban public spaces: social and philosopical aspects. O-vo: Filosofiya, Istoriya, Kul'tura, 2016, no. 11, pp. 58–63. (In Russ.).

14. Kolosov V.A., Vendina O.I., Borodulina N.A., Seredina E.V., Fedorov D.R., Klimanov V.V. The establishment of new entrepreneurial environment in Moscow: the main trends and contradictions. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 1998, no. 5, pp. 95–109. (In Russ.).

15. Levinson A.G. Fluid and motionless in the Moscow periphery. In Arkheologiya periferii [Archeology of Periphery]. Grigoryan Yu., Ed. Moscow: MUF, 2013, pp. 315–342. (In Russ.).

16. Lefebvre H. The ideas for the new urbanism concept. Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie, 2002, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 19–26. (In Russ.).

17. Lefebvre H. La production de l’espace. Paris: Éditions Anthropos, 1974. 485 p.

18. Luhmann N. Die Realitat der Massenmedien. Opladen: Westdt. Verl., 1996, 2 ed. 219 p.

19. Malakhov V.S. Kul'turnye razlichiya i politicheskie granitsy v epokhu global'nykh migratsii [Cultural Differences and Political Borders in the Era of Global Migration]. Moscow: NLO Publ., 2014. 230 p.

20. “March of Millions” of June 12: a social portrait of the protest movement (materials of the special survey of the VCIOM). Monitoring Obshchestv. Mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i Sotsial'nye Peremeny, 2012, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 47–72. (In Russ.).

21. Makhrova A.G., Nozdrina N.N. Differentiation of the housing market in Moscow as a manifestation of the social stratification of population. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2002, no. 3, pp. 44–50. (In Russ.).

22. Makhrova A.G., Tatarintseva A.A. The пentrification зrocesses and the Moscow city center reconstruction in the post-Soviet period. Reg. Issled., 2006, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 28–42. (In Russ.).

23. Mkrtchyan N.V. Population dynamics of Russia’s regions and the role of migration: Critical assessment based on the 2002 and 2010 censuses. Reg. Res. Russ., 2011, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 228–239. doi 10.1134/ S2079970511030087

24. Mkrtchyan N.V. Migration in Moscow and Moscow region: regional and structural pecularities. Reg. Issled., 2015, no. 3, pp. 107–116. (In Russ.).

25. Novikov A., Kotov E., Goncharov R., Nikogosyan K., Gorodnichev A. Moskva: kurs na politsentrichnost'. Otsenka effektov gradostroitel'nykh proektov na politsentricheskoe razvitie Moskvy [Moscow: Course towards a Policentric City. An estimation of Urban Planning Projects Effects on the Polycentric Development of Moscow]. Moscow: MUF, 2016. 32 p.

26. Puzanov K., Stepantsov P. Mekhanika Moskvy. Issledovanie gorodskoi sredy [Mechanics of Moscow. The Сase-studies of Moscow Urban Environment]. Moscow: Mosk. Inst. Sotsial'no-Kul'turnykh Program, 2015. 95 p.

27. Rodoman B.B. The principle of position and locational pressure. Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 1979, no. 4, pp. 14–20. (In Russ.).

28. Sokolovskii S. Identity and identification: call for expanding an anthropological agenda. In Svoi i chuzhie. Metamorfozy identichnosti na vostoke i zapade Evropy [Natives and Strangers. Identity Metamorphoses in Eastern and Western Europe]. Filippova E.I., Le Torrivellec X., Eds. Moscow: Goryachaya Li niya – Telekom Publ., 2018, pp. 28–50. (In Russ.).

29. Tikunov V.S. Klassifikatsii v geografii [Classification in Geography]. Moscow-Smolensk: Smolenskii Gos. Univ., 1997. 367 p.

30. Ekkel' B.M. The index of ethnic mozaiс calculation for the Republics, provinces and regions of the USSR. Sov. Etnografiya, 1976, no. 2, pp. 33–42. (In Russ.).

31. Em P.P. A big city as an independent central place system, a case study of Moscow. Reg. Res. Russ., 2018, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 151–157. doi 10.1134/ S2079970518020041

32. Bourdieu P. Raisons pratiques. Sur la theorie de l’action. Paris: Seuil, 1994. 251 p.

33. Dunneier M. Ghetto: the Invention of a Place. The History of an Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2016. 292 p.

34. Gehl J. Cities for People. Island Press, 2010. 288 p.

35. Gehl J. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press, 2011. 216 p.

36. Hall P. Forces shaping urban Europe. Urban Stud., 1993, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 883–898.

37. Hall T., Hubbard P. The entrepreneurial city: new urban politics, new urban geographies. Prog. Hum. Geog., 1996, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 153–174.

38. Harvey D. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geogr. Ann. B Hum. Geogr., 1989, vol. 71, no.1, pp. 3–17.

39. Harvey D. The right to the city. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 2003, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 939–941.

40. Hurlbert S.H. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 1971, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 577–586.

41. Jost L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos. 2006, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 363–375.

42. Katz P., Scully V.J., Bressi T.W. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community. New York: McGraw Hill, 1994. 288 p.

43. Lefebvre H. Le droit a la ville. Paris: Anthropos, 2009, 3 ed. 135 p.

44. Logan J.R., Molotch H.L. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press, 1987. 383 p.

45. Residential Segregation in Comparative Perspective: Making Sense of Contextual Diversity. Maloutas Th., Fujita K., Eds. Routledge, 2016. 328 p.

46. Massy D.S., Denton N.A. The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 1988, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 281–315.

47. Massy D.S., White M.J., Phua V.C. The dimension of segregation revisited. Sociol. Methods Res., 1996, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 172–206.

48. Mitchell D. The end of public space? People’s Park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr., 1995, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 108–133.

49. Molotch H. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. Am. J. Sociol., 1976, no. 82, no. 2, pp. 309–332.

50. Vendina O.I. Muscovites and newcomers: strategies for mutual adaptation. Reg. Res. Russ., 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 395–403.

51. Wacquant L.J.D. Parias urbains. Ghetto, banlieues, État. Paris: La Découverte, 2006. 332 p.

52. Wilkes R., Iceland J. Hyper-segregation in the twenty-first century. Demography, 2004, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 23–36.