Runoff Components of Small Catchments in Sikhote-Alin: Summarizing the Results of Field Measurements and Tracer Modeling

The article summarizes results of the systematic study of the streamflow formation of two small catchments in the upper part of the Ussuri River. The study was carried out by the hydrograph separation technique (using detailed data of the hydrochemical and hydrological monitoring) and the use of a tracer mixing model in conjunction with EMMA. Performed in the period from 2011 to 2016 the studies allowed to calculate the river runoff components of the summer-autumn period at 3 gauge-stations and evaluate their mutual dynamics at different time scales. It is shown that in the case of landscape uniformity of the catchment (the Medvezhiy Creek), the river flow can be represented as a result of 3 sources’ mixing. This, the most common, scheme for the hydrograph separation includes following sources: a direct rainfall flow, an organic soil water component, and an underground baseflow. If the catchment’s landscape structure is clearly heterogeneous (the Elovy Creek), the river flow can be represented as a result of 4 sources’ mixing. In this case, the fourth source appears as a  result of the separation of soil water component into individual components – organic and mineral. This separation is due to the spread in the basin of the cold upper belt of fir-spruce forests, whose soils are characterized by a lower rate of organic matter destruction and a deeper illuviation process of DOC. Statistically significant dependencies of the some runoff components’ proportions against river discharges were identified, systematization of which makes them promising for practice in hydrological monitoring and forecasting.

catchment, water sources, chemical tracers, mixing model, EMMA, hydrograph separation

1. Arzhanova V.S., Yelpatyevsky P.V. Geokhimiya, funk tsi onirovanie i dinamika gornykh geosistem Sikhote-Alinya [Geochemistry, Functioning and Dynamics of the Sikhote-Alin Mountain Geosystems]. Vladivostok: Dalnauka Publ., 2005. 247 p.

2. Boldeskul A.G., Shamov V.V., Gartsman B.I., Kozhev nikova N.K. Main ions in water of different genetic types in a small river basin: case experimental studies in Central Sikhote-Alin. Tikhookean. Geol., 2014, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 90–101. (In Russ.).

3. Voronkov P.P. Regularities in the formation process and zonation of water chemistry in local runoff. Tr. Gl. Geofiz. Obs. im. A.I. Voeikova, 1963, no. 102, pp. 43–119. (In Russ.).

4. Gartsman B.I., Shamov V.V. Field studies of runoff formation in the Far East Region based on modern observational instruments. Water Resour., 2015, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 766–775.

5. Gubareva T.S., Boldeskul A.G., Gartsman B.I., Shamov V.V. Analysis of natural tracers and genetic runoff components in mixing models: case study of small basins in Primor’e. Water Resour., 2016, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 629–640.

6. Gubareva T.S., Gartsman B.I., Solopov V.N. A model of mixing of four river runoff recharge sources using hydrochemical tracers in the problem of hydrograph separation. Water Resour., 2018, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 827–838.

7. Gubareva T.S., Gartsman B.I., Shamov V.V., Boldeskul A.G., Kozhevnikova N.K. Genetic disintegration of the runoff hydrograph. Russ. Meteorol. Gydrol., 2015, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 215–222.

8. Kondratiev I.I. The trans-boundary factor in chemical composition variability of atmospheric precipitation in the southern Far East. Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2009, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 236–241.

9. Lutsenko T.N., Shamov V.V., Gartsman B.I., Gubareva T.S., Kozhevnikova N.K., Boldeskul A.G., Lupakov S.Yu. Spacio-temporal dynamics of dissolved organic carbon in the streams of system of the upper Ussuri river (south of the Far East of Russia). In Organicheskoe veshchestvo i biogennye elementy vo vnutrennikh vodoemakh i morskikh vodakh Pochvy v biosfere [Organic Matter and Biogenic Elements in Inland and Seawater]. Barnaul: Inst. Vodn. Ekol. Probl. Sib. Otd. Akad. Nauk, 2017, pp. 155–160. (In Russ.).

10. Ali G.A., Roy A.G., Turmel M.C., Courchesne F. Source-to-stream connectivity assessment through end-member mixing analysis. J. Hydrol., 2010, vol. 3–4, no. 392, pp. 119-135.

11. Barthold F.K., Turner B.L, Elsenbeer H., Zimmermann A. A hydrochemical approach to quantify the role of return flow in a surface flow-dominated catchment. Hydrol. Process., 2017, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1018-1033.

12. Christophersen N., Neal C., Hooper R.P., Vogt R.D., Andersen S. Modelling stream water chemistry of soilwater end-members - a step towards second-generation acidification models. J. Hydrol., 1990, vol. 116, no. 1–4, pp. 307-320.

13. Correa A., Windhorst D., Tetzlaff D., Crespo P., Célleri R., Feyen J., Breuer L. Temporal dynamics in dominant runoff sources and flow paths in the Andrean Paramo. Water Resour. Res., 2017, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 5998-6017.

14. Cristophersen N., Hopper R.P. Multivariate analysis of stream water chemical data: the use of principal component analysis for the end-member mixing problem. Water Resour. Res., 1992, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 99–107.

15. Hooper R.P. Diagnostic tools for mixing models of stream water chemistry. Water Resour. Res., 2003, vol. 39, no. 3. doi 10.1029/2002WR001528

16. Iwasaki K., Katsuyama M., Tani M. Contributions of bedrock groundwater to the upscaling of storm-runoff generation processes in weathered granitic headwater catchments. Hydrol. Process., 2015, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1535-1548.

17. James A.L., Roulet N.T. Investigating the applicability of end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) across scale: A study of eight small, nested catchments in a temperate forested watershed. Water Resour. Res., 2006, vol. 42, no. 8. doi 10.1029/2005WR004419

18. Katsuyama M., Ohte N., Kobashi S. A three-component end-member analysis of streamwater hydrochemistry in a small Japanese forested headwater catchment. Hydrol. Process., 2001, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 249–260.

19. Leibundgut С., Maloszewski P., Külls C. Tracers in Hydrology. Chichester: Wiley, 2009. 432 p.